Commit Graph
845 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jcoffey-dev 34d3f21b4b Merge pull request 'ci: pin discourse-release at 9282c6f, which maps inbuxa-webmail' (#39) from ci/announce-pin-inbuxa-webmail into main
ci / node (push) Skipped
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Skipped
ci / publish (push) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (push) Successful in 1m55s
ci / announce (push) Skipped
2026-10-05 03:49:11 +00:00
jcoffey-dev 0c5ad7a3b8 ci: pin discourse-release at 9282c6f, which maps inbuxa-webmail
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (pull_request) Successful in 2m26s
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Skipped
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
ci / node (pull_request) Skipped
The release map knew this repo only by its old name, so announcing
inbuxa-v2026.10.5-g17a8093 failed. The action itself is unchanged.
2026-10-04 20:46:27 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 17a8093c09 Merge pull request 'Rename the repository to inbuxa-webmail' (#38) from chore/rename-to-inbuxa-webmail into main
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
github/ci (tag inbuxa-v2026.10.5-g17a8093) GitHub Actions
ci / github (push) Successful in 3m47s
announce / announce (release) Failing after 24s
ci / node (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Skipped
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / publish (push) Skipped
ci / announce (push) Failing after 22s
inbuxa-v2026.10.5-g17a8093
2026-10-05 03:31:51 +00:00
jcoffey-dev 5664896f53 Rename the repository to inbuxa-webmail
ci / node (pull_request) Skipped
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Skipped
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (pull_request) Successful in 1m30s
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
The repository moved from inbuxa/ihasmail-inbuxa to inbuxa/inbuxa-webmail,
matching inbuxa-server and inbuxa-admin. Point the source links, the image
name and the package link at the new name. The OAuth client id stays
ihasmail-inbuxa, since that is what the server registers.
2026-10-04 20:29:09 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 4d7668601e Merge pull request 'ci: copy each release image to GHCR as a replica' (#37) from ci/ghcr-replica into main
ci / node (push) Skipped
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Skipped
ci / publish (push) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (push) Successful in 2m34s
ci / announce (push) Skipped
2026-09-30 16:30:40 +00:00
jcoffey-dev bdee5de814 ci: copy each release image to GHCR as a replica
ci / node (pull_request) Skipped
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Skipped
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (pull_request) Successful in 2m23s
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
The Gitea registry stays authoritative; GHCR becomes a copy of it, the way
the GitHub repository is a copy of the Gitea one. After the tag build has
pushed the release image to the registry, a new ghcr job copies it to
ghcr.io under the same version tag and :latest with `imagetools create` --
a copy, not a rebuild, so the digest on GHCR is the digest on the registry.

Anything still pulling the old ghcr.io name, including the TrueNAS app
submission, keeps receiving releases. The job uses the run's own token and is
left out of the status reported to Gitea, so a GHCR problem cannot fail a
release.
2026-09-30 09:27:48 -07:00
jcoffey-dev b1436d4d2a Merge pull request 'ci: copy each release to GitHub after the tag build' (#36) from ci/github-release-copy into main
ci / node (push) Skipped
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Skipped
ci / publish (push) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (push) Successful in 2m16s
ci / announce (push) Skipped
2026-09-30 13:54:41 +00:00
jcoffey-dev a7c7d88408 ci: copy each release to GitHub after the tag build
ci / node (pull_request) Skipped
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Skipped
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (pull_request) Successful in 2m29s
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
The mirror carries tags to GitHub but not releases, so the replica's
Releases page -- and anyone watching the repository there -- stopped at the
last release made on GitHub. After the tag build has published, a new
github-release job copies the tag's Gitea release to a GitHub release: the
same notes, with PR and issue numbers rewritten to Gitea links, the same
files, and a line pointing back to the Gitea release.

It uses the run's own token and is left out of the status reported to
Gitea, so it cannot fail a release. With no Gitea release for the tag it
does nothing.
2026-09-30 06:52:03 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 63ddc23ee2 Merge pull request 'ci: name the tag in GitHub's tag status, and make digests re-runnable' (#35) from ci/tag-path-hardening into main
ci / node (push) Skipped
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Skipped
ci / publish (push) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (push) Successful in 2m24s
ci / announce (push) Skipped
2026-09-30 13:47:42 +00:00
jcoffey-dev ae83d27e4b ci: name the tag in GitHub's tag status, and make digests re-runnable
ci / node (pull_request) Skipped
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Skipped
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (pull_request) Successful in 2m29s
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
Commit statuses belong to the commit, not the tag. Upstream v* tags and
inbuxa-v* tags can sit on the same commit, so Gitea's github job, waiting
for "github/ci (tag)", could read the other tag's older result and move on
before this tag's build finished. A tag's status is now "github/ci (tag
<name>)" on both sides.

The per-architecture digest artifacts are also overwritable and kept for a
week, so re-running a build, or publish on its own, still works.
2026-09-30 06:44:52 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 043fe4ca54 Merge pull request 'ci: run the github wait job on its own runner label' (#34) from ci/wait-runner into main
ci / node (push) Skipped
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Skipped
ci / publish (push) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (push) Successful in 2m13s
ci / announce (push) Skipped
2026-09-30 07:39:03 +00:00
jcoffey-dev 24dccdb47d ci: run the github wait job on its own runner label
ci / node (pull_request) Skipped
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Skipped
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (pull_request) Successful in 2m38s
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
The github job only polls Gitea for GitHub's commit status, but it holds a
runner slot for as long as the GitHub build takes -- the better part of an
hour for a cold build. On the shared build runners a handful of those
could take every slot and stall real work, so it now runs on the `wait`
label: a runner of its own, with many slots, no docker socket and a small
CPU and memory cap.
2026-09-30 00:36:13 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 6e1166319a Merge pull request 'ci: a cancelled GitHub run no longer reports failure to Gitea' (#33) from fix/ci-report-cancelled into main
ci / node (push) Skipped
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Skipped
ci / publish (push) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (push) Successful in 2m22s
ci / announce (push) Skipped
2026-09-30 07:29:52 +00:00
jcoffey-dev ddb6ce4611 ci: a cancelled GitHub run no longer reports failure to Gitea
ci / node (pull_request) Skipped
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Skipped
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (pull_request) Successful in 2m30s
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
The mirror can push one commit twice in quick succession. GitHub then
starts two runs and cancels the older, and that run's report job posted
"failure" for the commit. Gitea's github job, seeing the newest status,
failed the check while the surviving run was still building and later
passed.

A cancelled run now posts nothing and leaves the result to the run that
superseded it. A real failure still reports failure.
2026-09-30 00:26:40 -07:00
jcoffey-dev bf35e75f88 Merge pull request 'docs: point issues and discussions at Gitea and the forum' (#32) from docs/mirror-note into main
ci / node (push) Skipped
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Skipped
ci / publish (push) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (push) Successful in 2m28s
ci / announce (push) Skipped
2026-09-30 07:18:31 +00:00
jcoffey-dev 3251478d61 docs: point issues and discussions at Gitea and the forum
ci / node (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Skipped
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (pull_request) Successful in 1m49s
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
This repository is now push-mirrored to GitHub, where issues and pull
requests would never reach the maintainers. A note under the title says
where development happens, and sends issues to git.coffeylabs.org and
discussions to community.coffeylabs.org.
2026-09-30 00:16:10 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 401c32a3e6 Merge pull request 'ci: build on GitHub via the mirror, switchable with BUILD_ON' (#31) from ci/build-on-github into main
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / github (push) Skipped
ci / node (push) Successful in 2m58s
ci / publish (push) Skipped
ci / announce (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Successful in 39s
ci / node (pull_request) Skipped
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Skipped
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
ci / github (pull_request) Successful in 2m4s
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
Reviewed-on: inbuxa/ihasmail-inbuxa#31
2026-09-30 06:52:38 +00:00
jcoffey-dev 216ebd4dfe Build on GitHub Actions when BUILD_ON=github
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Successful in 1m20s
ci / github (pull_request) Skipped
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / node (pull_request) Successful in 2m23s
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
Gitea stays the source of truth and push-mirrors this repository to
GitHub. The org variable BUILD_ON, set on both forges, picks where the
heavy work runs:

- unset: nothing changes. Gitea's jobs run as before and every job in
  the GitHub workflow is skipped.
- github: Gitea skips its test, build and publish jobs. GitHub Actions
  runs them on hosted runners, arm64 natively rather than under QEMU,
  publishes to the same Gitea registry, and posts a commit status back
  to Gitea. A new `github` job in Gitea's ci.yml waits for that status
  and passes or fails with it, so the Gitea run still decides a PR.

Announcing and releasing stay on Gitea whatever BUILD_ON says.

The GitHub-era workflows go: cleanup.yml pruned GHCR, release.yml was a
second weekly scheduler, and publish.yml pushed to GHCR. Their work is
in the new .github/workflows/ci.yml or stays on Gitea. dependabot.yml
goes too: its pull request branches would exist only on GitHub, and
every mirror sync would delete them.
2026-09-29 23:06:27 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 829e46beae Merge pull request 'Confirm a typed password without replaying it over JMAP' (#30) from fix/confirm-password-without-basic into main
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / node (push) Successful in 2m32s
ci / publish (push) Skipped
ci / announce (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Successful in 2m20s
2026-09-29 17:03:54 +00:00
jcoffey-dev 1acf2f29e7 Confirm a typed password without replaying it over JMAP
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / node (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Successful in 35s
Creating an app password asks for the account password. A session
holding a token has no password to compare with, so it sent the typed
one to the mail server as HTTP Basic on the JMAP session. INBUXA's
server now takes no password outside DAV (contract C-23), so that check
would always fail.

It now asks the server's sign-in endpoint, the one its own sign-in page
posts to, as this client, to its registered redirect URI, with a PKCE
challenge whose verifier is thrown away so the code can never be
exchanged. "Two-factor code needed" counts as confirmed: the server
says so only after the password matched, so accounts with two-factor
sign-in now pass where the Basic check failed them.

The mock answers /api/auth like the server and can refuse Basic on
JMAP; the app-password test turns that on, and fails on the old check.
2026-09-29 06:50:32 -07:00
jcoffey-dev d73f5e8f9e Merge pull request 'DLP on send: warnings, blocks and held mail in the composer' (#29) from feature/dlp-dialogs into main
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / node (push) Successful in 3m17s
ci / publish (push) Skipped
ci / announce (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Successful in 19s
2026-09-29 01:55:54 +00:00
jcoffey-dev 07cfe1310e DLP on send: warnings, blocks and held mail in the composer
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / node (pull_request) Successful in 2m13s
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Successful in 1m13s
The webmail half of inbuxa's DLP (dlp-and-mail-flow-rules spec, §2.5,
§4):

- A send the server's DLP rules refuse (inbuxa:dlpWarning or
  inbuxa:dlpBlocked) comes back to the composer with the rules' notices
  instead of a generic "Send failed". A warning offers "Send anyway…",
  which asks for a reason and sends again with inbuxa:dlpOverride; the
  server records the reason. A block can only be answered by changing
  the message.
- A message DLP held for review says so on sending ("Held for review:
  it's sent once a reviewer releases it"), from the submission's
  inbuxa:held.
- Tests: the override travels with the submission only when there's a
  reason; refusals are told apart from other errors.

Nine new English strings (the notice labels, the prompt, the toasts);
the other catalogs fall back to English until translated.
2026-09-28 18:51:45 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 290bc63dbb Merge pull request 'Say which legacy protocols are off when only some are' (#28) from feature/per-protocol-legacy-note into main
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / node (push) Successful in 1m19s
ci / publish (push) Skipped
ci / announce (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Successful in 16s
2026-09-28 06:27:12 +00:00
jcoffey-dev 44f8e30c45 Say which legacy protocols are off when only some are
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / node (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Successful in 46s
inbuxa can now switch IMAP, POP3 and ManageSieve off one at a time,
server-wide and per organization, and the session lists what is still
allowed for the account (legacyAllowed). Where the webmail said
"legacy protocols are off", it now also covers the case where only
some are:

- Security & sessions, above app passwords: "Your organization has
  turned off POP3 for mail apps. Mail apps that use it can't connect
  to this account; others still can."
- The Administration dashboard: "Some legacy mail protocols are off for
  your organization: POP3."
- An organization's sheet in Administration: its switch stays the
  all-or-nothing one; when only some are off it names them and points
  to the console, where they're switched one at a time, and "Turn
  legacy protocols back on" turns them all back on.

With every protocol off, the existing wording shows, as before. From a
server that doesn't send legacyAllowed nothing new appears.

3 new strings in all nine catalogs, unreviewed.

Tested: unit tests for reading the session and a tenant's switches;
the existing tests updated for the new field; typecheck; the whole
suite (1475 tests); and in headless Chrome against a local server with
POP3 off, where Security & sessions showed the new note.
2026-09-27 23:21:21 -07:00
jcoffey-dev ac0f8789f6 Merge pull request 'Delete people in the console, not the webmail's Administration' (#27) from feature/delete-in-console into main
ci / node (push) Successful in 1m42s
ci / publish (push) Skipped
ci / announce (push) Skipped
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Successful in 27s
2026-09-28 02:34:53 +00:00
jcoffey-dev 5c08fb9fe9 Delete people in the console, not the webmail's Administration
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Successful in 34s
ci / node (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
Deleting a person's account is the console's now, beside locking it and
legal holds: the console asks why, for the audit log, and says when a
hold keeps the data. Where Delete was, the account's page says so and
links to the account in the console when the server names one. Groups,
lists, domains and tenants keep their delete here.

2 new strings in all nine catalogs, unreviewed.
2026-09-27 19:32:33 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 9e47437ef8 Merge pull request 'Open a locked account whole: calendar, contacts and files too' (#26) from feature/delegate-whole-account into main
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / node (push) Successful in 1m7s
ci / publish (push) Skipped
ci / announce (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Successful in 15s
2026-09-28 01:06:55 +00:00
jcoffey-dev 173680cc41 Open a locked account whole: calendar, contacts and files too
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / node (pull_request) Successful in 1m7s
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Successful in 35s
Switching to a locked account handed to the reader moved only the mail.
Now calendar, contacts and files follow it as well, through a new
viewAccountFor that the three stores use for what they show. Settings,
signatures and push keep ownAccountFor, so nothing of the reader's is
ever written into the locked account (inbuxa AL-7).
2026-09-27 18:04:38 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 22d891b1ed Merge pull request 'Seven app fixes from public ihasmail' (#25) from merge/public-app-fixes into main
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / node (push) Successful in 2m30s
ci / publish (push) Skipped
ci / announce (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Successful in 1m56s
2026-09-27 23:32:21 +00:00
jcoffey-dev c64a23f9d9 List folders in sidebar order in the move-to picker
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / node (pull_request) Successful in 2m29s
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Successful in 1m23s
The picker sorted folders A-Z by path, with Inbox first, so a folder
dragged into place in the sidebar turned up somewhere else when moving
mail. It now walks the tree in compareFolders order, the sidebar's
order with every folder expanded: Inbox, then the saved order, then
the special folders, then A-Z, with subfolders under their parent.

treeOrder lives beside compareFolders. A folder the walk from the top
cannot reach is appended rather than dropped, so it stays pickable as
it was before.

Closes #1

(cherry picked from commit ea03406646062359f74e16ad8a8aed074b4dc409)
2026-09-27 16:27:24 -07:00
jcoffey fedc34698e The toolbar above an open message acts on that message (#414) (#417)
With conversation view off, marking a message unread from the list --
the hover button, the right-click menu -- marked that message. Opening
it and pressing Mark as unread in the toolbar above it marked every
message in its thread, and so did Move to, Report spam and Delete.

The setting already reaches all the way into the reading pane: the list
draws one row per message, and `visibleMessages` narrows the pane to the
one opened. The toolbar was half converted. Its labels were right --
Mark as unread against Mark as read, the star, the labels shown -- all
of those read `messages`, which is the narrowed set. Only `rowIds`, the
one thing actually handed to the action, still read `thread.emailIds`.
So the button said one message and did the whole conversation.

`rowIds` is now the same question `visibleMessages` answers for the
pane, asked of the same ids, with the same fallback: an id that names
nothing in the thread -- a link from somebody with conversation view on,
a stale `m` in the URL -- shows the conversation, so the toolbar takes
the conversation. Conversation view on is unchanged: nothing is singled
out, so the whole thread comes back as before.

No new strings.

(cherry picked from commit f627bfc1237d6e8bbc728147022f624c3834d648)
2026-09-27 16:27:24 -07:00
jcoffey 8bfc7a85a9 A reply to a self-addressed message follows its Reply-To (#415) (#416)
A website contact form mails the site's own address: From and To are
both info@thesite, and the person who filled the form in is in Reply-To.
Replying addressed the draft to info@thesite -- the site's own desk --
instead of to them.

The reply already knows two shapes. A message somebody sent me is
answered to its Reply-To, which is what that header is for. A message
*I* sent is answered to the people I wrote to, and deliberately not to
my own Reply-To, which is where answers to me belong and would send my
reply to myself. A contact form passes the test for the second: every
address in From is mine.

So it fell down the chain the second shape keeps for a message with
nobody obvious to answer -- To without me, then Cc, then, having run
out, every address on the message, which here was mine alone.

The Reply-To now goes in that chain, one step before the last: when no
recipient but me is left and the message names a Reply-To that is not
mine either, that address is who it is really from. Keeping it after the
Cc is what leaves a message I did send alone -- somebody I actually
wrote to still beats my own Reply-To, which is the case the existing
guard was built for and its test still holds.

No new strings.

(cherry picked from commit 01dc322aebcff0e8075c54f81eb7d171a32fb9e7)
2026-09-27 16:27:24 -07:00
jcoffey 2fffc9043d Quote images through the proxy, and unproxy them on the way out (#412) (#413)
Reading a message fetches its remote images through this server, so the
sender learns nothing about the reader. Quoting the same message into a
reply fetched them directly: same pixel, same reader, but the request
carried their IP and user agent -- exactly what the proxy withholds.

A quote now proxies them the way the message view does. That alone would
be wrong, because a proxied URL belongs to this deployment: sent
unchanged it would reach the recipient as images only this server can
serve, broken for them and a beacon back here. So buildEmailObject turns
them back into the addresses they came from, beside the pass that
restores images blocked under pr411 and the one that turns editor blob
URLs into cid: references.

Deployments with the proxy off are unaffected: the quote fetches
directly, as reading does there.

Three tests from pr411 asserted the address sat in src when images were
allowed, which was the old behaviour; they now ask whether the draft
fetches it at all, proxied or not.

No new strings.

(cherry picked from commit 23557a72a2a72088081792f8ea0cabedea4e7bcb)
2026-09-27 16:27:24 -07:00
jcoffey a94fd9cce3 Quoting follows the message's own image decision (#410) (#411)
Replying sanitized the quoted body with allowRemote: true, so quoting
fetched every remote image in the message whatever the reader had
decided about it. A tracking pixel in the quote then reported the
message read, and the address live, to whoever was counting -- the thing
leaving the images blocked was meant to prevent. Edit as new and opening
a draft that quotes a message did the same.

The decision now lives in one place, remoteImagesAllowed(), asked with
the same inputs the reader's answer used: the image policy, the trusted
senders, whether the sender is a contact, and whether Show images was
pressed on that message. The last of those was component state, so it
moves to the mail store, where the composer can see it.

Blocked images already keep their address in data-ihm-remote, so nothing
is lost by not fetching: it goes back on the way out, and the sent quote
is what its sender wrote. The recipient's client decides for itself, as
it would with any other client's reply.

Before pr408 this needed a rich-text default to reach; the format offer
made it reachable from plain text, which is how it was found.

No new strings.

(cherry picked from commit d329b33912921a851c548bffef5085e5fbf72bed)
2026-09-27 16:27:24 -07:00
jcoffey 9ba2c6e290 Switching format keeps the original quote, not a flattened copy (#409) (#409)
Switching a reply between plain text and rich text converted whatever
body the draft was showing. Going from plain text to rich, that meant
the quoted message came back as the "> " text quote run through a
converter -- the sender's formatting, images and links gone, even though
the original markup was sitting on the draft untouched.

Both forms of the quote are prepared when the reply opens, so keep them
on the draft and re-attach the right one when the format changes. Only
what the author typed above the quote is converted. Where the quote
can't be found any more -- edited by hand, or a draft that quotes
nothing -- the whole body is converted as before, which is what every
non-reply draft does.

No new strings.

(cherry picked from commit 88f9e6c50a04f8ffc4702d1d1e3cffa6a93e7690)
2026-09-27 16:27:24 -07:00
jcoffey 996aa66ef0 Offer the message's own format when replying (#407) (#408)
A reply opened in the format the settings ask for, whatever the message
being answered was written in, and the per-draft switch was buried in
the composer's ⋮ menu. Replying in plain text to a rich text message
throws away the formatting; replying in rich text to a plain-text one
overrides what the sender chose to write in.

When the two disagree the composer now says so above the editor -- "This
message is rich text", with a Switch button and a dismiss -- and the
draft still opens in the format the settings ask for. Switching converts
that draft only and leaves the setting alone; switching from the ⋮ menu
answers the offer too. Forwards get it as well, where the formatting
being passed on is somebody else's.

What counts as rich text is hasHtmlAlternative(), which reads the body
part's own type: `htmlBody` is derived (RFC 8621 4.1.4), so a plain-text
message has one too and its presence proves nothing.

The mock said otherwise -- it returned an empty `htmlBody` for a
plain-text message, where Stalwart 0.16.21 returns the text/plain part
in both lists. Both builders now answer as the server does, so the path
this feature depends on is exercised in development rather than only
against a real mailbox.

Two new strings, translated in all nine catalogs; the buttons reuse the
menu's existing "Switch to plain text" / "Switch to rich text". The
count falling back to English stays at 16 in every language.

Fixes #407

(cherry picked from commit d992442b8194be5e9c48204332c7243d9587b4ca)
2026-09-27 16:27:24 -07:00
jcoffey-dev d5c49c2962 Merge pull request 'Mark no interface language Beta' (#24) from i18n/no-beta-languages into main
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / node (push) Successful in 2m33s
ci / publish (push) Skipped
ci / announce (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Successful in 15s
2026-09-27 23:05:17 +00:00
jcoffey-dev ee675004f2 Mark no interface language Beta
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / node (pull_request) Successful in 2m26s
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Every shipped language is offered without the Beta mark. The flag and
its settings note stay, so public ihasmail's changes to them still apply.
2026-09-27 16:01:58 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 2361caf2c7 Merge pull request 'Dutch out of Beta: the native speaker's final review, from public ihasmail' (#23) from i18n/dutch-native-review into main
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / node (push) Successful in 2m37s
ci / publish (push) Skipped
ci / announce (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Successful in 16s
2026-09-27 23:01:42 +00:00
jcoffey-dev 2c4d6cdfae Link Michael's profile from the Dutch credits
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / node (pull_request) Successful in 2m40s
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Successful in 30s
(cherry picked from commit 9840a537834082bfd9a028a170ce2d6ac60ddf35)
2026-09-27 15:57:28 -07:00
jcoffey-dev f95072ab92 Credit Michael (mbjboon82) for the Dutch review
Name the reviewer in both Dutch catalogs, FEATURES and ROADMAP, under both of his handles, and record that his wording stands.

(cherry picked from commit aaa86e96d66e2431a8c98467712a977d4035bf76)
2026-09-27 15:57:28 -07:00
jcoffey-dev ab759143ab Take Dutch out of Beta with the native speaker's final review
Michael (mbjboon-netizen) sent the final corrections for nl.ts and the Dutch
permission labels and signed the language off, so Nederlands no longer
carries the Beta flag in the picker.

The main catalog changes 52 values, mostly "regels" -> "filterregels" and
"post" -> "e-mail(s)". The permission headings move from compound nouns
("Accountbeheer") to verb phrases ("Accounts beheren"), and the reviewer's
note on that is kept in the file. No keys were added or removed, and every
placeholder is intact.

One entry is kept as it was: "It {damage}, ..." stays "Het {damage}, ...".
{damage} is filled with a verb phrase ("stops in the middle of a line"), so
the added "is" would have doubled the verb.

README, FEATURES, ROADMAP and KNOWN-ISSUES now say Dutch has been reviewed
and the other eight have not.

(cherry picked from commit e30fd73d7dbb1463859efbc4048f680d21d64c56)
2026-09-27 15:57:23 -07:00
jcoffey-dev d0f7c6ed20 Merge pull request 'Open locked accounts handed to you, beside your own mail' (#22) from feature/delegated-accounts into main
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / node (push) Successful in 2m45s
ci / publish (push) Skipped
ci / announce (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Successful in 15s
2026-09-27 22:55:38 +00:00
jcoffey-dev 4fcc8dd1b9 Show every folder of a locked account in view
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / node (pull_request) Successful in 2m25s
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Successful in 30s
Folder subscriptions are the reader's own and they have none in an
account handed to them, so only Inbox showed. Every folder shows while a
locked account is in view, and Hide from list is gone there.
2026-09-27 15:50:51 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 8674b70f62 Open locked accounts handed to you, beside your own mail
When the server hands a locked account to the reader (urn:inbuxa:jmap
delegation), the account popover offers it. Only mail follows the switch;
the reader's own settings, push and notifications stay theirs. A red bar,
a red wordmark with a padlock and the tab title say which account is in
view. Read delegates can't change anything, organize delegates can't
delete, and writing needs send-as. A delegation taken away drops back to
the reader's own mail.

14 new strings in all nine catalogs, unreviewed (inbuxa AL-7, AL-8).
2026-09-27 14:32:10 -07:00
jcoffey-dev ffe1a898f5 Merge pull request 'Version the brand images URLs' (#21) from brand/versioned-images into main
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / node (push) Successful in 2m46s
ci / publish (push) Skipped
ci / announce (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Successful in 17s
2026-09-27 05:53:40 +00:00
jcoffey-dev 0adc402629 Version the brand images' URLs, so a new mark reaches returning visitors
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / node (pull_request) Successful in 2m25s
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Successful in 37s
The logo, favicons and app icons are served from public/img under fixed
names with a browser cache of hours, and the service worker fetches them
through that cache. After the mark changed on 2026-09-27, returning
visitors kept the old cat until their copies expired, and the favicon
and an installed app's icon hold on longer still.

Every URL that names one now carries ?v=BRAND_V (src/lib/brand.ts,
brandImage()): the header, sign-in, About, the mail empty state, the
notification icons, index.html's favicon links, the manifest's icons
and the service worker's shell and notification icons. Date-stamped,
never a counter, for the sites' ASSET_V reason; the three static files
carry the value written out, and the comment says to keep them in step.
2026-09-26 22:50:22 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 2a30a32c79 Merge pull request 'Brand: inbuxa own kitten replaces ihasmail cat' (#20) from brand/new-mark into main
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / node (push) Successful in 2m29s
ci / publish (push) Skipped
ci / announce (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Successful in 3m19s
2026-09-27 05:12:38 +00:00
jcoffey-dev ee41846c2d Brand: inbuxa's own kitten replaces ihasmail's cat
ci / version (pull_request) Skipped
ci / node (pull_request) Successful in 2m43s
ci / publish (pull_request) Skipped
ci / announce (pull_request) Skipped
ci / docker-build (pull_request) Successful in 1m7s
The webmail showed ihasmail's cat-and-envelope as inbuxa's mark. The new
mark keeps the family's face, paws and colors, over a server with a bay
for each piece of the suite: the letter (webmail), a prompt (console),
status lights (server).

- img/inbuxa-mark.png (header, sign-in, About) and img/logo.png (the
  mail empty state and the custom-name fallback).
- favicon.ico, favicon-64, apple-touch-icon (opaque white, as before),
  icon-192/512, and icon-maskable, now on an opaque ground with the
  mark inside the safe circle.
- Login.tsx: 120x126, the new mark's proportions; 120x143 would have
  stretched it. Every other use sizes by one dimension.
- The service worker fetches images network-first, so installed copies
  pick the new ones up without a cache version bump.
2026-09-26 22:03:19 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 6cb3321022 Merge pull request 'Announce releases on the community forum' (#19) from announce-releases into main
ci / version (push) Skipped
ci / node (push) Successful in 2m6s
ci / publish (push) Skipped
ci / announce (push) Skipped
ci / docker-build (push) Successful in 13s
2026-09-27 02:37:12 +00:00