jcoffey-dev
a63839f6b0
SPEC 2.2a says INBUXA writes its own when the repository is first published, and it is. Until now the public repository carried Stalwart's: a security policy telling people to report vulnerabilities to Stalwart Labs, and a contributing guide whose policy is that pull requests from anyone not on upstream's vouched list are closed automatically. Neither is this project's, and both were being offered to anyone who looked. So: a security policy that says where to send a report, and what happens if it turns out to be upstream's bug rather than ours; a contributing guide that says what a fork of someone else's code needs from a contributor, including the clean-room question, since the record has to stay true; the Contributor Covenant; and a sponsor link. Upstream's two security documents move to .github-upstream/ beside its workflows -- kept, not used, not presented as ours. CI builds the server and compiles every test target, and deliberately runs no suite. The unit tests only build with the integration crate in the graph, and the integration suites want a STORE, fixed ports and a container apiece, so running them here would mean a tick that skipped everything or a cross that means "the runner has no Redis". The workflow says as much, so nobody has to rediscover it. Also ignores /artifact: two hand-built binaries, ~190 MB, one `git add -A` away from a public repository.
129 lines
5.1 KiB
Markdown
129 lines
5.1 KiB
Markdown
# Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct
|
|
|
|
## Our Pledge
|
|
|
|
We as members, contributors, and leaders pledge to make participation in our
|
|
community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body
|
|
size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender
|
|
identity and expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status,
|
|
nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity
|
|
and orientation.
|
|
|
|
We pledge to act and interact in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming,
|
|
diverse, inclusive, and healthy community.
|
|
|
|
## Our Standards
|
|
|
|
Examples of behavior that contributes to a positive environment for our
|
|
community include:
|
|
|
|
* Demonstrating empathy and kindness toward other people
|
|
* Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences
|
|
* Giving and gracefully accepting constructive feedback
|
|
* Accepting responsibility and apologizing to those affected by our mistakes,
|
|
and learning from the experience
|
|
* Focusing on what is best not just for us as individuals, but for the
|
|
overall community
|
|
|
|
Examples of unacceptable behavior include:
|
|
|
|
* The use of sexualized language or imagery, and sexual attention or
|
|
advances of any kind
|
|
* Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
|
|
* Public or private harassment
|
|
* Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or email
|
|
address, without their explicit permission
|
|
* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
|
|
professional setting
|
|
|
|
## Enforcement Responsibilities
|
|
|
|
Community leaders are responsible for clarifying and enforcing our standards of
|
|
acceptable behavior and will take appropriate and fair corrective action in
|
|
response to any behavior that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive,
|
|
or harmful.
|
|
|
|
Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject
|
|
comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are
|
|
not aligned to this Code of Conduct, and will communicate reasons for moderation
|
|
decisions when appropriate.
|
|
|
|
## Scope
|
|
|
|
This Code of Conduct applies within all community spaces, and also applies when
|
|
an individual is officially representing the community in public spaces.
|
|
Examples of representing our community include using an official e-mail address,
|
|
posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed
|
|
representative at an online or offline event.
|
|
|
|
## Enforcement
|
|
|
|
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
|
|
reported to the community leaders responsible for enforcement at
|
|
**johnellisATlinuxDOTcom**.
|
|
All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly.
|
|
|
|
All community leaders are obligated to respect the privacy and security of the
|
|
reporter of any incident.
|
|
|
|
## Enforcement Guidelines
|
|
|
|
Community leaders will follow these Community Impact Guidelines in determining
|
|
the consequences for any action they deem in violation of this Code of Conduct:
|
|
|
|
### 1. Correction
|
|
|
|
**Community Impact**: Use of inappropriate language or other behavior deemed
|
|
unprofessional or unwelcome in the community.
|
|
|
|
**Consequence**: A private, written warning from community leaders, providing
|
|
clarity around the nature of the violation and an explanation of why the
|
|
behavior was inappropriate. A public apology may be requested.
|
|
|
|
### 2. Warning
|
|
|
|
**Community Impact**: A violation through a single incident or series
|
|
of actions.
|
|
|
|
**Consequence**: A warning with consequences for continued behavior. No
|
|
interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction with
|
|
those enforcing the Code of Conduct, for a specified period of time. This
|
|
includes avoiding interactions in community spaces as well as external channels
|
|
like social media. Violating these terms may lead to a temporary or
|
|
permanent ban.
|
|
|
|
### 3. Temporary Ban
|
|
|
|
**Community Impact**: A serious violation of community standards, including
|
|
sustained inappropriate behavior.
|
|
|
|
**Consequence**: A temporary ban from any sort of interaction or public
|
|
communication with the community for a specified period of time. No public or
|
|
private interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction
|
|
with those enforcing the Code of Conduct, is allowed during this period.
|
|
Violating these terms may lead to a permanent ban.
|
|
|
|
### 4. Permanent Ban
|
|
|
|
**Community Impact**: Demonstrating a pattern of violation of community
|
|
standards, including sustained inappropriate behavior, harassment of an
|
|
individual, or aggression toward or disparagement of classes of individuals.
|
|
|
|
**Consequence**: A permanent ban from any sort of public interaction within
|
|
the community.
|
|
|
|
## Attribution
|
|
|
|
This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage],
|
|
version 2.0, available at
|
|
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/0/code_of_conduct.html.
|
|
|
|
Community Impact Guidelines were inspired by [Mozilla's code of conduct
|
|
enforcement ladder](https://github.com/mozilla/diversity).
|
|
|
|
[homepage]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org
|
|
|
|
For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see the FAQ at
|
|
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq. Translations are available at
|
|
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations.
|