Files
cairnobs/docs/security/threat-model.md
T
jcoffey-dev f756a9d4f6 Rename the project spec and update every reference to it
The charter file carried a tool-specific name while being the repository's own
document: mission, non-negotiable constraints, the pinned stack, repo
conventions and phase status, cited as authority by thirty files across the
agent, api, deploy, docs, search and terraform trees.

PROJECT-SPEC.md says what it is. All 42 references are updated in the same
commit, including the relative link in docs/status.md, so nothing points at a
filename that no longer exists.
2026-08-28 15:57:12 -07:00

585 lines
39 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Cairn OBS Threat Model (Phase 4)
Written for a prospective enterprise customer's security team, describing
the system **as actually built** through Phase 4 task 7 — not the target
architecture. Where a control is designed but not yet implemented, this
document says so explicitly, with a pointer to the tracking doc/task.
See `/docs/phase-4-isolation-design.md` and `/docs/phase-4-rbac-design.md`
for the full design rationale behind the controls described here.
## Read this first: the single most important open finding
**Updated a seventh time — and this time the headline actually changes.**
This section originally read "log data queried through `POST /query` is
not tenant-isolated at all," then "ClickHouse is isolated but Tantivy
isn't," then "ingest tags records with a tenant identity but nothing
routes the write," then "ClickHouse write-routing is built but Tantivy's
isn't," then "both are write-routed but neither rechecks tenant-active
status live," then "both recheck, but ClickHouse's snapshot never
refreshes while Tantivy's does," then (sixth) "both engines are built
and code-complete, but the ClickHouse half has never actually run
against a real ClickHouse." That last gap is now closed: Docker access
became available, and every ClickHouse-dependent piece named below —
`tenantprovision`, `chrunner`, `chwriter`, the `system.*` metadata
isolation check, and `enterprise-api` itself actually starting and
serving traffic — has been run against a real
`clickhouse/clickhouse-server:24.8` and a real Postgres, not just
type-checked or run against fakes. Closing this loop caught and fixed
six real bugs that no amount of Docker-free testing could have found:
a Docker build-context bug that made `enterprise-auth` fail to build at
all, a validation gap in `dashboards.Store.AddPanel`/`UpdatePanel`, a
raw Postgres error leaking past `rbacstore`'s `ErrNotFound` boundary,
`enterprise-api` panicking on startup from a duplicate `GET /healthz`
route registration, ClickHouse's `default` user genuinely lacking
`CREATE USER` privilege until `CLICKHOUSE_DEFAULT_ACCESS_MANAGEMENT=1`
was added to `docker-compose.yml`, and — most load-bearing — a freshly
provisioned tenant user was **not** actually default-denied from
`system.*` on this ClickHouse version, exactly the risk task 2's
original design flagged as needing live verification rather than trust.
See `/docs/phase-4-runbook.md` §§114 for the full list of what was run
and what each finding was.
Both storage engines are isolated on both the read and write paths,
**both gate writes on an active-tenant check, and both refresh that
check periodically** — `chwriter.Registry.StartRefreshing` re-lists
active tenants every minute, the same interval
`tenants.ActiveTenantTracker` uses on the Tantivy side, opening
connections for newly-active tenants and closing/removing ones no
longer active — a deprovisioned tenant loses ClickHouse write access
within a minute, not "until the next `enterprise-ingest` restart."
Neither engine does a live per-write check (a database/HTTP round trip
per record would be a real throughput cost neither implementation
accepts), so a minute-wide staleness window remains on both sides by
design, not by oversight. What's left: two tenants (`acme`, `globex`)
have been provisioned and exercised end-to-end in this environment.
Human login itself is now verified for real, via both protocols — a
real Auth0 identity logged in via OIDC and (separately) via Auth0's
SAML2 Web App addon, selected between both tenants each way, and
`POST /internal/authorize` confirmed each selection issued the right
tenant/role (see §3a/§3b/§12 below) — but that walkthrough ran against
plain `api` serving `web`'s traffic, not `enterprise-api`, so the
specific combination of "real human SSO session" and "real per-tenant
ClickHouse routing via `chrunner`" in the same request hasn't been
driven end to end yet; each half is independently confirmed (real
ClickHouse connections and Go integration tests for the routing half,
real Auth0 sessions for the human-login half), just not together in one
request. And **whether a given deployment actually runs the isolated
binaries** remains a deployment-time decision, not a code-level
guarantee — see below.
**ClickHouse (the SQL path) is built and now genuinely verified live.**
`enterprise/internal/tenantprovision` (real `CREATE DATABASE`/`CREATE
USER`/`GRANT`/`REVOKE`) and `enterprise/internal/chrunner` (a per-tenant
connection registry implementing `api/querylang/executor.SQLRunner`,
resolving the tenant from request identity, never a parameter) are wired
into `enterprise/cmd/enterprise-api`, which has itself been built,
started, and confirmed serving traffic on a real docker-compose stack.
Every ClickHouse-dependent test in both packages passes against a real
`clickhouse/clickhouse-server:24.8`, including the cross-tenant raw-SQL
probe and the corrected `system.*` metadata-isolation check (see "Known
residual risks" below for the real, version-specific wrinkle that check
found).
**Tantivy (the free-text path) is also built, and — unlike the
ClickHouse pieces — genuinely verified in this environment.**
`search/src/registry.rs`'s `IndexRegistry` resolves a `SearchRequest.
tenant_id` to its own on-disk Tantivy index, opened on demand;
`enterprise/internal/searchclient` sets that field from the
authenticated request identity, mirroring `chrunner`'s exact "read from
ctx, fail closed, never a parameter" shape. Because Tantivy is an
embedded library (no external service to fake or skip), both sides could
actually be run: `search/src/registry.rs`'s
`tenant_index_is_isolated_from_default_and_other_tenants` seeds three
real indices with the same search term and confirms a tenant-scoped
search returns only that tenant's document; `enterprise/internal/
searchclient`'s tests run a real in-process gRPC server and confirm the
wire-level `SearchRequest` carries the right `tenant_id`. All pass, for
real, no disclaimer needed for this specific claim.
**Both Helm and docker-compose now close this.**
`deploy/helm/cairnobs/templates/api.yaml` and `enterprise-api.yaml` are
mutually exclusive, gated on opposite sides of the same
`enterprise.enabled` flag, rendering to the same Service name/port — so
a Helm-deployed cluster runs exactly one of the two binaries, chosen by
the same flag that turns on RBAC/audit/SSO, not a second
independently-forgettable decision. Verified by parsing (not
eyeballing) the rendered YAML under both values: exactly one `cairnobs-api`
Deployment either way, with the right image. `docker-compose.yml`'s
`api`/`enterprise-api` services are now the analogous mutually-exclusive
choice, gated behind `COMPOSE_PROFILES` (`.env` checks in
`single-tenant`, i.e. plain `api`, as the zero-config default) and
sharing the same host port/network-alias trick to stay transparent to
`alerting`/`web` either way — verified via `docker compose config`
(renders and validates the merged YAML without a daemon; confirms
`api`/`enterprise-api` never both appear in `--services` output for the
same profile selection) *and* via an actual `docker compose up` of
`enterprise-api` in this environment, which is what caught the duplicate
`GET /healthz` route panic mentioned above — see
`/docs/phase-4-runbook.md` §10a. This still only constrains
*deployment*, not *operation*: nothing stops an
operator from manually running plain `api`'s image against a cluster
(or compose project) that has tenants
provisioned, pointing at the same ClickHouse/Postgres. The Helm chart
makes the *default*, chart-managed path correct; it isn't a runtime
guard against misconfiguration.
**Ingest now has a real tenant identity, and both storage engines'
write-routing is built.** `chrunner`/`searchclient` prove *read*
isolation given tenant-scoped data exists; an optional
`ingest/internal/grpcserver.TenantResolver` closes the "does a record
know which tenant it belongs to" half by validating a per-tenant bearer
credential an agent presents
(`enterprise-auth -create-ingest-credential-tenant=<id>` mints one; only
its SHA-256 hash is ever stored) against a `POST
/internal/authorize-ingest` endpoint, and attaching the resolved tenant
ID to every record as a `tenant_id` Kafka message header before
producing it — fail-closed: once a resolver is configured, a missing or
invalid credential refuses the whole batch, never falls back to "no
tenant."
**ClickHouse**: `enterprise/cmd/enterprise-ingest` (a second binary,
mirroring `enterprise-api`) consumes that header: it reuses
`ingest/consumer`'s own flush loop with `enterprise/internal/
chwriter.Registry` — a per-tenant `*clickhousewriter.Writer` registry,
built the same way `chrunner`'s per-tenant connections are — swapped in
as the writer, so a tagged batch's records are grouped by tenant and
each group INSERTed through that tenant's own ClickHouse connection,
fail-closed on an untagged or unprovisioned tenant. Building it surfaced
a real gap in an already-shipped control: `tenantprovision.
ProvisionClickHouse`'s grant was `SELECT`-only (correct for the
read-side credential `chrunner` uses, but `chwriter` reuses the same
credential for writes) — every real per-tenant write would have failed
with a permission error until this was widened to `SELECT, INSERT`.
`Registry.StartRefreshing` (new) re-lists active tenants every minute
and reconciles the writer map — opens a connection for a newly-active
tenant, closes and removes one no longer active — closing what was
originally a startup-only snapshot with no refresh at all. **Not yet
confirmed against a real ClickHouse**, same caveat as the read-side
chrunner claim above — the Docker-free fail-closed and refresh-error
tests pass, the live-database tests (including the two new ones proving
refresh's add/remove reconciliation against real connections) are
written but skip-gated, see `/docs/phase-4-runbook.md`.
**Tantivy**: `search/src/consumer.rs` now resolves each record's
`tenant_id` header through the *same* `IndexRegistry` the read side
already used (`search/src/registry.rs`), and writes there instead of
always into the default index — genuinely verified in this environment,
same as the read-side Tantivy claim above, since Tantivy is an embedded
library with no Docker dependency. No "second binary" was needed here,
unlike ClickHouse: Tantivy has no grant system to gate a
separately-credentialed binary behind, so `IndexRegistry` already lived
directly in this AGPL-core `search` binary, and read/write simply share
it. (This reasoning predates Phase 6's relicensing of `enterprise/` to
AGPLv3 and originally referred to a commercially-licensed credential --
restated here because the architectural point holds independent of
licensing: Tantivy still has no grant system, so the split was never
about which license `enterprise/` carried.)
This write path is now also active-tenant-gated:
`search/src/tenants.rs`'s `ActiveTenantTracker` polls a new
`GET /internal/active-tenants` endpoint on `enterprise-auth` every 60
seconds (RoleService-credentialed, the same auth shape `alerting` uses
against `api`) and `consumer.rs` refuses any tagged record whose tenant
isn't in the polled allowlist — fail-closed on the first fetch (startup
blocks until it succeeds), last-known-good on any later refresh failure.
Off unless `ENTERPRISE_AUTH_URL`/`ENTERPRISE_AUTH_SERVICE_TOKEN` are
both set. Genuinely verified here too: real HTTP round trips (the Bearer
header actually sent, JSON parsing, both fail-closed paths) against a
hand-rolled TCP test server, no live enterprise-auth needed since
`reqwest` doesn't care that the other end is real.
**Both engines share one open question now** — deployment topology,
covered above — and no longer differ in active-tenant staleness bound:
`chwriter.Registry.StartRefreshing` re-lists active tenants every
minute, matching `ActiveTenantTracker`'s interval, opening a connection
for a newly-active tenant and closing/removing one no longer active.
Neither is a live per-write check (that would mean a database/HTTP
round trip on every record, a real throughput cost neither
implementation accepts), so a roughly one-minute staleness window
remains on both sides by design, not a gap unique to either engine
anymore. A newly-provisioned tenant's ClickHouse database and Tantivy
index are both now real, isolated, and actually populated by
write-routed agent traffic (the ClickHouse claim pending live
confirmation, the Tantivy claim already verified).
## System overview
```
Browser ──▶ web (SvelteKit, static)
Browser ──▶ api OR enterprise-api ──▶ ClickHouse (log data, SQL path)
│ └─▶ search (gRPC) ──▶ Tantivy (log data, full-text path)
└─▶ Postgres (control plane: dashboards, alert_rules,
tenants, users, tenant_memberships, audit_log)
# api: one shared ClickHouse connection, one shared (default) Tantivy
# index via api/searchclient, nil AuditLogger -- Phase 0-3 behavior.
# enterprise-api: enterprise/internal/chrunner (per-tenant ClickHouse
# connections) + enterprise/internal/searchclient (per-tenant Tantivy
# index, via search's SearchRequest.tenant_id) + enterprise/internal/
# audit.QueryAPILogger (real audit writes) wired into the SAME
# api/queryapi.Handler/api/dashboards.Handler core -- see this
# document's "Read this first" section. Either binary can be running;
# nothing forces the isolated one.
alerting ──▶ api or enterprise-api (POST /query, RoleService credential)
alerting ──▶ Postgres (rulestore, notifystore)
api/alerting ──▶ enterprise-auth (POST /internal/authorize, HTTP only —
no Go import edge, see "Module
boundary" below)
Browser ──▶ enterprise-auth (GET /auth/oidc/login, /auth/oidc/callback)
└─▶ external IdP (OIDC authorization code flow)
└─▶ Postgres (rbacstore: users, tenant_memberships)
cairnobsctl ──▶ api, alerting (Bearer token when CAIRNOBSCTL_TOKEN is set)
```
Ingest path (agent → Redpanda → ingest → ClickHouse, and Redpanda →
search → Tantivy): `ingest` resolves and tags each record with a real
tenant ID (see "Read this first" above). `enterprise/cmd/enterprise-ingest`
consumes that tag and routes ClickHouse writes to each tenant's own
database. `search/src/consumer.rs` (Tantivy's independent Redpanda
consumer) consumes the same tag and routes each record into its own
tenant's index. Both write paths' one remaining gap — no live
active-tenant recheck (ClickHouse: a startup-time snapshot; Tantivy: no
allowlist at all) — is named in "Read this first" above, not separately
designed in `/docs/phase-4-isolation-design.md`; named here as a gap that
design doc doesn't yet cover, not just an implementation gap.
## Module boundary (trust boundary #1)
`enterprise/` (SSO, RBAC storage, audit logging, session issuance — AGPLv3,
same as core as of Phase 6, see `/docs/compliance/license-audit-report.md`)
is never imported by core (`/api`, `/alerting`, `/web`, `/cli`) —
enforced in CI by `hack/check-tenant-boundary.sh`, which greps for the
import edge on every build. This is an architectural trust boundary, not
a licensing one: it keeps core buildable and deployable with zero
multi-tenant mechanism present regardless of what license either side
carries, and keeps tenant identity resolution server-side rather than
trusting a request parameter. Core calls
`enterprise-auth` over plain HTTP (`api/authz.HTTPAuthorizer`),
forwarding only the `Cookie`/`Authorization` headers, never the full
request (`api/authz/httpauthz_test.go` asserts this — an
unrelated header like `X-Forwarded-For` is never forwarded). This means
core's authorization decision is only as trustworthy as the network path
to `enterprise-auth` — see "Deployment/network assumptions" below.
## Authentication
**Implemented for both OIDC and SAML, to the same verification bar.**
`enterprise/internal/loginhandler` serves `GET /auth/oidc/login`
(redirects to the configured IdP, with a short-lived HttpOnly cookie
carrying CSRF-protection state) and `GET /auth/oidc/callback`
(validates state, exchanges the code, verifies the ID token via
`enterprise/internal/oidc`'s real `coreos/go-oidc` wiring, upserts a
`users` row keyed by SSO subject, resolves tenant/role from
`tenant_memberships`, and issues a `session.Manager`-signed session
cookie), plus the SAML equivalent, `GET /auth/saml/login` (redirects to
the configured IdP via `enterprise/internal/saml`'s
`ServiceProvider.LoginURL`, persisting the AuthnRequest ID in a
short-lived cookie — SAML's replay/unsolicited-response defense,
standing in for OIDC's `state`) and `POST /auth/saml/acs` (validates the
assertion's signature and `InResponseTo` against that cookie via
`ServiceProvider.ParseResponse`, then converges on the same
upsert/resolve/issue-session path OIDC uses). Both are verified
end-to-end with real cryptography, not mocked: OIDC's tests spin up a
real fake IdP (`coreos/go-oidc`'s own `oidctest` package) that signs
genuine RS256 ID tokens; SAML's tests spin up a real fake IdP
(`crewjam/saml/samlidp`) that builds and signs genuine SAML assertions
and XML-signs the response, exercising the same `ServiceProvider.
ParseResponse` signature-verification path production uses. Every test
in `loginhandler_test.go` and `saml_test.go` passes, including the full
login→callback/ACS→session-cookie round trip for both protocols, and
negative-path tests for each (state/`InResponseTo` mismatch, missing/
expired credential, missing required claim, no/multiple tenant
memberships). Writing the SAML test caught two real bugs in
`enterprise/internal/saml`'s `ParseResponse`, both fixed before this
verification was considered complete: it never called `r.ParseForm()`
before reading the POSTed `SAMLResponse` field (every real ACS POST
would have decoded an empty response), and its email-attribute matching
missed `urn:oid:0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.3` (the standard LDAP "mail"
OID) — what an IdP sends by default when the SP hasn't explicitly
requested an attribute literally named "email", which is exactly what
`samlidp`'s own default assertion builder does. **Not yet verified for
either protocol**: wiring this into a running `enterprise-auth`
container against a *real* external IdP (Google/Okta/etc.) — that needs
real IdP credentials and a reachable callback/ACS URL neither of which
this environment has; see `/docs/phase-4-runbook.md`.
A user with zero `tenant_memberships` rows is refused outright (403).
More than one no longer guesses or refuses: `finishLogin` issues a
short-lived `session.Manager` "pending login" token (a distinct Go/JWT
type from a real session, with its own disjoint claim name so a real
session token can't double as one — a real bug this design's own test
suite caught before it shipped, see `session.PendingLoginClaims`'s doc
comment) and redirects to `web/src/routes/select-tenant`, backed by two
endpoints (`GET /auth/memberships`, `POST /auth/select-tenant`) that
list the identity's real tenant options and, on selection, re-derive the
role for the chosen tenant server-side (never trusting a client-supplied
role) before issuing the real session. Both the *backend protocol* and
the *frontend page* that calls it are now built. The backend is verified
with the same real-fake-IdP tests as the rest of `internal/loginhandler`.
The frontend needed a second CORS posture — `httpserver.
WithCredentialedCORS`, a literal origin plus
`Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true`, since a credentialed `fetch`
and a wildcard `Access-Control-Allow-Origin` can never be combined, so
this couldn't reuse `enterprise-api`'s wildcard-friendly `WithCORS` — and
is genuinely verified in a real browser in this environment (not just
type-checked): the full cross-origin pending-login-cookie round trip, a
real click choosing a tenant, the post-selection redirect, and the
missing/expired-cookie error path, all driven against a throwaway server
standing in for `enterprise-auth`'s exact wire contract. `GET
/auth/features` (`enterprise/internal/authhandler`) reports whether
OIDC/SAML are *configured*, for `/web`'s settings page to conditionally
render — independent of whether a login button actually exists yet in
the UI (it doesn't yet; a user still has to be sent to
`/auth/oidc/login`/`/auth/saml/login` by some means other than clicking
something in `web`, since no page links there).
**Implemented for the one machine caller.** `/alerting`'s evaluator is
the sole service-to-service caller (`POST /query`, to evaluate rule
conditions across tenants). It presents a long-lived, signed
(HS256/JWT) `RoleService` credential, minted offline via
`enterprise-auth -mint-service-token=alerting` (an operator action, not
a network-reachable endpoint) and configured via `API_SERVICE_TOKEN`.
`enterprise/internal/session.Manager` issues and validates this token;
`enterprise/internal/authhandler`'s `POST /internal/authorize` resolves
it. `RoleService` is a distinct, non-comparable lane on the `Role` type
(`api/authz.Role.Satisfies`) — a service credential can never
satisfy a human-role check and vice versa, verified by exhaustive
table-driven tests (`api/authz/authz_test.go`).
**Session/token integrity.** Tokens are HS256-signed JWTs with a single
shared signing key (`ENTERPRISE_SESSION_SIGNING_KEY`, ≥32 bytes,
required at `enterprise-auth` startup). Compromise of this key lets an
attacker forge any identity, including `RoleService` — it is the single
highest-value secret in the enterprise deployment and should be treated
accordingly (a real KMS/secrets-manager-backed value, not the
`docker-compose.yml`/Helm chart's dev-only literal). Token validation
(`enterprise/internal/session.Manager.Validate`) collapses every failure
mode — bad signature, malformed token, expired — into one
`ErrInvalidToken`, deliberately not distinguishing "expired" from
"forged" so a caller can't be tempted to treat either as a softer case.
## Authorization (RBAC)
**Live and enforced.** `POST /query` and every `/dashboards` endpoint in
`api` require a minimum role, resolved per-request via
`api/authz.RequireRole`/`RequireRoleOrService` calling
`enterprise-auth`. Roles: Viewer < Editor < Admin < Owner, plus the
separate `RoleService` lane above. `GET /dashboards` is Viewer+;
create/update/delete require Editor+ (`api/dashboards/
handler.go`). A nil `Authorizer` (no `ENTERPRISE_AUTH_URL` configured)
is a deliberate no-op, matching Phase 0-3's no-auth behavior — this is
correct default-open-for-single-tenant behavior, not an oversight, but
means an operator who forgets to set `ENTERPRISE_AUTH_URL` in a
multi-tenant deployment gets *no* enforcement at all, silently. Worth a
deployment-time check a real rollout should add (not built here).
**Now enforced:** the RBAC matrix's `(own/granted)` qualifier for
Editor-level dashboard actions. `dashboard_permissions`
(`metadata/migrations/0024_create_dashboard_permissions.sql`, tightened
by `0033_restrict_dashboard_permissions_role.sql`) is read via
`api/dashboards.PermissionStore` — a core-defined interface, same shape
as `queryapi.AuditLogger` — implemented by
`enterprise/internal/rbacstore.DashboardPermissions` and wired in only
by `enterprise/cmd/enterprise-api`. A plain Editor may now only
edit/delete a dashboard (or its panels) they created, or one where a
grant raises their effective role to Editor; Admin/Owner still act on
any dashboard in their tenant. Managing grants themselves
(`PUT`/`DELETE /dashboards/{id}/permissions/{userId}`) is deliberately
stricter than editing content — only the creator or Admin/Owner may
grant or revoke, never a user who can edit *only* because of a grant
(closes a self-escalation path a looser check would allow). Verified by
`api/dashboards/handler_test.go`'s fake-store tests (the ownership/
grant/admin matrix, plus the granted-editor-cannot-manage-grants
regression case) — real integration tests against a live Postgres exist
in `enterprise/internal/rbacstore/rbacstore_test.go` but, like the rest
of this phase's rbacstore work, have not been run against one in this
environment. A plain `api/cmd/api` deployment with RBAC enforcement on
but no enterprise permission service wired still enforces ownership/
Admin — only the "granted" bonus and grant management are unavailable
there (nil `PermissionStore` is a documented no-op, same shape as a nil
`Authorizer`).
**Application-layer tenant scoping (dashboards only).** Every
`dashboards` store query filters `WHERE tenant_id = $identity.TenantID`
(`api/dashboards/store.go`), and the handler resolves that
tenant ID from the RBAC-authenticated identity's context
(`authz.IdentityFromContext`), **never** from a client-supplied request
field. This closes a real gap found during this document's own review:
`Dashboard.TenantID` is a JSON-tagged, client-settable field
(`api/dashboards/types.go`), and the original handler/store
implementation trusted it directly on create/update and applied no
`tenant_id` filter at all on list/get/update/delete — meaning any
authenticated user could read, modify, or delete any other tenant's
dashboards simply by supplying (or guessing) their UUID, or spoof
`tenant_id` on create/import to write into a tenant they don't belong
to. Fixed as part of this task, with regression tests proving
cross-tenant access now returns 404 (not 403, which would itself leak
that the ID exists under a different tenant) —
`api/dashboards/handler_test.go`'s
`TestCrossTenant*`/`TestCreateDashboardIgnoresClientSuppliedTenantID`/
`TestImportIgnoresExportedTenantID`. **This same class of bug should be
assumed present anywhere else client-supplied identifiers cross a tenant
boundary until proven otherwise by an adversarial test** — see task 8's
adversarial test suite for what's been checked so far and what hasn't.
**Query-path tenant scoping: none** — see the top of this document.
RBAC's role check on `POST /query` answers "is this identity allowed to
run *a* query," not "does this query's result set respect tenant
boundaries" — it can't, because the executor has no tenant concept to
enforce.
## Audit logging
**Live**, and independently verified against a real Postgres (not just
written) — `enterprise/internal/audit`'s integration tests. Two
independent defenses back "no update/delete path from the application
layer":
1. A dedicated `audit_writer` Postgres role with only `INSERT`+`SELECT`
grants (`metadata/migrations/0012-0014`), via its **own**
`pgxpool.Pool` — never the shared `cairnobs` role/pool every other
store uses.
2. A `BEFORE UPDATE OR DELETE ... RAISE EXCEPTION` trigger
(`metadata/migrations/0015-0016`) that rejects the operation for
*any* role, including the table owner — confirmed live: even the
`cairnobs` role cannot `UPDATE` a row without first disabling the
trigger, a privileged operation distinct from ordinary application
access.
**Tamper detection, not tamper prevention against a privileged
attacker.** Rows are hash-chained (`prev_hash`/`row_hash =
SHA256(prev_hash || canonical_fields)`, serialized under
`pg_advisory_xact_lock` so concurrent writers can't fork the chain —
verified with a 20-goroutine concurrency test against live Postgres).
The chain alone only proves internal self-consistency: a Postgres
superuser (or anyone who compromises that credential) can wipe
`audit_log` and regenerate a perfectly self-consistent new chain from
row 1. `enterprise/internal/audit.Checkpointer` periodically ships a
rolling hash to an external `CheckpointSink` for exactly this reason —
`FileSink` (the only implementation built so far) is explicitly
documented as a dev/testing stand-in, **not** a real external-anchoring
guarantee (it writes to a local file the same privileged attacker could
also reach). A real deployment needs a genuine `CheckpointSink`
(S3 with Object Lock, or equivalent, reachable by a credential the
database administrator doesn't also hold) before the "prove nothing was
altered after the fact" claim actually holds against a privileged
insider.
**Fail-open by design for routine queries.** `queryapi.Handler.logAudit`
(`api/queryapi/handler.go`) logs a write failure and otherwise
ignores it — an audit-log outage does not take down the query path. This
is a deliberate availability-over-completeness tradeoff: it means a
brief audit outage produces an under-logged (not over-blocked) window.
No privileged/administrative action (role change, SSO config change,
notification-target secret reveal) currently exists to enforce
fail-closed on, since none of those flows are built yet
(`enterprise/internal/rbacstore` has no HTTP handlers) — when they are,
they should fail closed per `/docs/phase-4-isolation-design.md`'s
original policy, and that policy is not yet exercised by any real code
path.
**What's logged:** query text, language, row count, duration,
success/error — not result contents. `Source`/`EventType` fields exist
(`SourceAPI`/`SourceWeb`/`SourceCLI`/`SourceAlerting`,
`EventQuery`/`EventRoleChange`/`EventGrantChange`/
`EventSSOConfigChange`/`EventSecretReveal`) but only `EventQuery` from
`SourceAPI` is actually wired to a call site
(`queryapi.Handler.logAudit`) — the others are typed placeholders for
work not yet built (there's no role-change/grant-change/SSO-config
handler to call them from).
## Known residual risks (explicitly out of scope, not silently assumed away)
Per `/PROJECT-SPEC.md`'s Phase 4 non-goals, restated here in threat-model
terms:
- **A privileged ClickHouse/Postgres administrator is not defended
against.** Every isolation and audit-integrity guarantee in this
document is a structural defense against *application-layer* bugs and
injection — not against someone holding database superuser
credentials. That's an operational control (credential custody,
infrastructure access review), out of scope for this system's own
code.
- **`system.query_log` metadata leakage — now closed and verified live**
against the pinned version (`clickhouse/clickhouse-server:24.8`), with
a real, non-obvious wrinkle: a freshly created tenant user was **not**
default-denied from `system.*` the way the original design assumed
(`ProvisionClickHouse` now issues an explicit `REVOKE SELECT ON
system.* FROM <user>` — see that function's doc comment). Confirming
this live also surfaced a genuine ClickHouse behavioral split the
design doc didn't anticipate: `system.query_log` is a real
access-checked table (the REVOKE makes it hard-deny,
`ACCESS_DENIED`), but `system.tables` is a filtered *catalog* view
that ClickHouse 24.8 never denies outright regardless of grants — it
just silently returns zero rows for a properly-revoked user. Both
outcomes close the actual leak (no other tenant's query text or
database/table names are visible either way);
`tenantprovision_test.go`'s `TestProvisionedUserCannotReadSystemTables`
was corrected to assert what each table actually does (hard error for
`query_log`, verified-empty-and-no-foreign-database-names for
`tables`) rather than demanding a hard error from both. Still
contingent on the deployment-shape caveat at the top of this document:
this only holds when `enterprise-api` (not plain `api`) is actually
serving traffic.
- **No deny-override grants** — `dashboard_permissions` is additive-only
by design; a full allow/deny ACL system is unbuilt, future work.
- **No data retention/deletion policy** for a deprovisioned tenant —
the `tenants.status` state machine includes `deprovisioning`, but what
actually happens to that tenant's ClickHouse/Tantivy/Postgres data is
an unanswered compliance question, not a designed-and-deferred one.
- **No general multi-cluster orchestration** — `/deploy`'s Helm
chart/Operator (`/deploy/README.md`) proves the K8s-side per-tenant
secret-management model, not a fully general multi-cluster system.
Now applied to a real (local `kind`) live cluster in this environment
— see that README's verification section — but only a single-cluster,
single-node test, not a real multi-cluster topology.
## Deployment/network assumptions
- `enterprise-auth`'s `/internal/authorize` and `/auth/features`
endpoints have no authentication of their own beyond the credentials
they're validating — they must be reachable only from inside the
cluster/trusted network (`api`/`alerting`/`web`), never exposed
publicly. Nothing in this codebase enforces that at the network layer;
it's a deployment responsibility (NetworkPolicy, or equivalent) not
yet codified in `/deploy/helm/cairnobs`.
- `ENTERPRISE_SESSION_SIGNING_KEY`, ClickHouse/Postgres passwords, and
(once minted) the `alerting` service token are all K8s `Secret`
objects in the Helm chart (`/deploy/helm/cairnobs/templates/
secrets.yaml`) — standard K8s `Secret` semantics apply (base64, not
encrypted at rest without a cluster-level `EncryptionConfiguration`).
No secrets-manager integration (Vault, cloud KMS) exists; the chart
documents this as an operator decision, not something it enforces.
## Summary: what's actually enforced today
| Control | Status |
|---|---|
| Role-based access control on `/query`, `/dashboards` | **Enforced** |
| `alerting``api` service-identity credential | **Enforced** |
| Tenant scoping on dashboards (control-plane data) | **Enforced** |
| ClickHouse per-tenant provisioning (`tenantprovision`) | **Enforced, verified live** against `clickhouse/clickhouse-server:24.8` — real `CREATE DATABASE`/`CREATE USER`/`GRANT`/`REVOKE`, real two-tenant cross-read probe |
| ClickHouse query routing (`chrunner`) | **Enforced, verified live** — real per-tenant connections, cross-tenant raw-SQL probe passes; only applies when `enterprise-api` serves traffic, not plain `api` |
| `system.*` ClickHouse metadata isolation | **Enforced, verified live**`system.query_log` hard-denies, `system.tables` returns zero foreign rows (see "Known residual risks" below for the ClickHouse-version-specific split between the two) |
| Tantivy per-tenant index routing (`search/src/registry.rs`) | **Enforced, verified live** — real Tantivy indices, real cross-tenant probe, all passing |
| Tantivy tenant_id resolution (`enterprise/internal/searchclient`) | **Enforced, verified live** — real gRPC wire-level test |
| Ingest tenant *identity* (credential validation, tagging) | **Built and tested** — fail-closed `TenantResolver`, `tenant_id` Kafka header attached per record |
| Ingest tenant *write-routing*, ClickHouse | **Enforced, verified live**`enterprise-ingest`/`chwriter.Registry` route each tagged batch to its tenant's own database, fail-closed on an untagged/unprovisioned tenant; both Docker-free and live-ClickHouse tests pass. Active-tenant snapshot refreshes every minute (`Registry.StartRefreshing`) — a deprovisioned tenant loses write access within a minute, not "until the next restart" |
| Ingest tenant *write-routing*, Tantivy | **Built and genuinely verified**`search/src/consumer.rs` routes each record into its own tenant's index via `IndexRegistry`, same registry the (already-verified) read side uses; no Docker needed, real tests pass. Active-tenant-gated too: `tenants::ActiveTenantTracker` polls `enterprise-auth` every 60s (off unless configured), refusing any tenant not in the polled allowlist — same one-minute staleness bound as ClickHouse's now-refreshing snapshot, no more asymmetry between the two |
| Deployment actually routing traffic to `enterprise-api` (Helm) | **Enforced, verified live**`api`/`enterprise-api` are mutually exclusive, same flag as RBAC/audit/SSO; a real `helm install` against a real `kind` cluster confirmed the `cairnobs-api` Deployment runs `cairnobs-enterprise-api:latest` with `enterprise.enabled=true`, real endpoints behind the `cairnobs-api` Service, not just `helm template`'s rendered YAML |
| Deployment actually routing traffic to `enterprise-api` (docker-compose) | **Enforced, verified live**`api`/`enterprise-api` are mutually exclusive via `COMPOSE_PROFILES`, same flag choice as Helm's `enterprise.enabled`; a real `docker compose up` of `enterprise-api` was run in this environment (and caught/fixed a startup-crashing duplicate `GET /healthz` route registration bug in the process), not just `docker compose config` |
| Human SSO login — OIDC | **Enforced, verified live** — real login against a real Auth0 developer tenant, full browser round trip; correctly failed closed on an identity with no `tenant_memberships` row, then succeeded and issued a real session after `-grant-membership-*`, with `POST /internal/authorize` returning exactly the granted tenant/role |
| Human SSO login — SAML | **Enforced, verified live** — real login against Auth0's SAML2 Web App addon acting as a real SAML IdP, over real (self-signed, dev-only) TLS; a real signed assertion validated (audience, destination, signature), landed on `/select-tenant` with real memberships, and `POST /internal/authorize` confirmed the selected tenant/role. Found and fixed a real bug in the process: `loginhandler.go`'s cookies decided `Secure` from `r.TLS != nil` alone, which is wrong behind any TLS-terminating reverse proxy (the deployment shape this handler actually runs in) — `enterprise-auth` never terminates TLS itself, so `r.TLS` was nil even over a genuinely HTTPS connection, silently dropping `Secure` and breaking SAML's `SameSite=None` cookie |
| Multi-tenant-membership login (tenant picker) | **Enforced, verified live** — a real Auth0 identity with two real tenant memberships (`acme` Admin, `globex` Viewer) landed on the real `/select-tenant` page against the real `enterprise-auth` container, rendered both with correct display names/roles via a real credentialed cross-origin `GET /auth/memberships`, and selecting either one issued a session that `POST /internal/authorize` confirmed matched — the selection genuinely determines the issued session's tenant, not just renders correctly. This pass also found and fixed a real bug: `web/Dockerfile` never declared `ARG`/`ENV` for `VITE_ALERTING_API_BASE_URL`/`VITE_ENTERPRISE_AUTH_BASE_URL`, so `docker-compose.yml`'s build args for them were silently dropped, leaving `enterpriseAuthBase` `undefined` in the built bundle |
| Per-resource dashboard grants (`own/granted`) | **Enforced, verified live** — real Postgres integration tests for `dashboard_permissions` CRUD and the `PermissionStore` adapter all pass (only when `enterprise-api` serves traffic — plain `api` falls back to own/Admin only) |
| Query audit logging (routine queries) | **Enforced**, fail-open, and now wired to a real writer via `enterprise-api` (`audit.QueryAPILogger`) |
| Audit log tamper detection (hash chain) | **Enforced**, verified live |
| Audit log tamper prevention (external anchoring) | **Design only**`FileSink` is a dev stand-in |
| Mid-provisioning-race handling (evaluator ticks against a not-yet-active tenant) | **Closed on both storage engines** — see `api/queryapi/tenant_isolation_gap_test.go`; ClickHouse verified Docker-free (structural, not just tested), Tantivy fixed and verified Docker-free after finding it was a real gap, not just an unverified assumption |
| Protection against a privileged DB administrator | **Explicit non-goal** |