Files
cairnobs/docs/architecture.md
T
jcoffey-dev 3eb0f4c589 Phase 4: SSO scaffolding, RBAC enforcement, tenant-scoped dashboards, audit logging, K8s deployment
RBAC (api/internal/authz) is live on /query and /dashboards, backed by a
new enterprise/ module (session issuance, audit logging, RBAC storage,
OIDC/SAML protocol wiring) that core never imports -- only calls over
HTTP. Found and fixed a real cross-tenant vulnerability in dashboards
(no tenant_id filtering at all) while writing the threat model doc.

Two things are explicitly NOT done, documented rather than hidden:
tenant isolation for log data itself (/query still shares one ClickHouse
connection and Tantivy index across every tenant -- RBAC controls who
can query, not what a query can see), and human SSO login (protocol
wiring exists, no HTTP handler calls it yet). See
docs/security/threat-model.md and docs/phase-4-runbook.md.

Also adds deploy/ (Go Operator + Helm chart, validated offline only --
no cluster was reachable in this environment).
2026-08-13 22:16:59 -07:00

173 lines
12 KiB
Markdown

# Sentry Architecture
> **Status:** Updated through Phase 4. The component map/diagram below is
> still the Phase 0 request path (agent → ingest → ClickHouse → api →
> web) — it was never redrawn for the full-text search, dashboards/
> alerting, or enterprise/ additions; see each phase's runbook
> (`/docs/phase-N-runbook.md`) for what was actually verified when it
> shipped. The component responsibilities table and the sections below
> the diagram are kept current. Phase 0's original framing ("draft,
> correct as needed") still applies to anything not yet built.
## Mission
Open-core, Kubernetes-native centralized logging platform. Compete with
Splunk on features; win on cost-per-GB, a modern language stack, and
multi-tenant RBAC that's actually honest about its guarantees.
## Component map
```
┌──────────┐ gRPC/mTLS ┌──────────┐ produce ┌───────────┐ consume ┌────────────┐
│ agent │ ────────────▶ │ ingest │ ──────────▶ │ Redpanda │ ────────▶ │ ingest │
│ (Rust) │ │ (Go) │ │ (Kafka API)│ │ consumer │
└──────────┘ └──────────┘ └───────────┘ │ (Go) │
└──────┬─────┘
│ batch INSERT
┌────────────┐
│ ClickHouse │
└─────┬──────┘
│ SQL
┌───────────▼───────────┐
│ api (Go: gRPC+REST) │
└───────────┬───────────┘
│ REST
┌───────────▼───────────┐
│ web (SvelteKit) │
└────────────────────────┘
```
Decision (confirmed 2026-08-12): Redpanda stays in the Phase 0 path. The
`ingest` service's gRPC front end produces to Redpanda rather than writing
ClickHouse directly; a separate consumer path reads from Redpanda and batches
inserts into ClickHouse. This exercises the real transport layer from day
one instead of deferring it, and keeps Kafka credentials off the edge agent.
## Storage / query split
- **ClickHouse** is the analytical store of record for structured log data:
timestamp, host, service, severity, message, plus a `Map(String,String)`
for arbitrary structured fields. Partitioned by day, ordered by
`(service, timestamp)`.
- **Tantivy** (Phase 1) will provide full-text indexing over the `message`
field and unstructured payloads, queried out-of-band from ClickHouse and
joined by a log identifier. Not built in Phase 0.
- **Schema-on-write** using OTel semantic conventions as the default log
schema; schema-on-read fallback for unstructured/raw text that doesn't fit
the structured columns (captured via the `Map` column and/or a raw
passthrough field).
- **Postgres** (Phase 3) holds control-plane config only — dashboards,
panels, notification targets, alert rules/state, delivery log, and
(Phase 4) tenants/users/tenant_memberships/audit_log. Never log data;
ClickHouse/Tantivy stay the only place a log record itself lives. See
`/docs/phase-3-dashboard-design.md` for why ClickHouse's MergeTree
family isn't a fit for this (no real row-level locking/transactional
read-modify-write).
This split is not to be changed without discussion — see CLAUDE.md.
## Component responsibilities
| Component | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| `agent` (Rust, musl) | Tail a log file or read journald; parse RFC 5424 syslog with raw passthrough fallback; batch; ship via gRPC/mTLS to `ingest`. Windows (ETW/Event Log) code exists but is unverified on real Windows hardware — see `/agent/README.md`. |
| `proto` | Shared `.proto` contracts for agent↔ingest and api↔search gRPC, versioned independently of either side. |
| `transport` | Redpanda docker-compose + topic provisioning scripts. No application code. |
| `ingest` (Go) | gRPC server accepting agent connections; produces normalized OTel-log-like records to Redpanda; separate consumer reads from Redpanda and batch-writes to ClickHouse. No tenant concept — every record lands in the one shared `logs` table regardless of source (see "Tenant isolation" below). |
| `storage` | ClickHouse schema migrations + docker-compose for local/homelab. |
| `search` (Rust, Phase 1) | Consumes the same Redpanda topic `ingest` does (own offset tracking), builds a Tantivy full-text index over `message`, serves matches over gRPC. One shared index for every tenant today — see "Tenant isolation" below. |
| `api` (Go) | gRPC + REST gateway. `POST /query` compiles pipe-syntax or raw SQL to one IR, executed across ClickHouse/Tantivy (`/docs/query-language-design.md`). `internal/dashboards` is CRUD only — panel query execution happens client-side, reusing `/query`. `internal/authz` (Phase 4) enforces RBAC via a network call to `enterprise-auth`, never an import. |
| `alerting` (Go, Phase 3) | Evaluates alert rules on an interval, calls `api`'s `POST /query` (via a `RoleService` credential once Phase 4 auth is configured — see `/docs/phase-4-isolation-design.md`'s alerting↔api gap), delivers firing/resolved notifications (webhook/Slack/PagerDuty). |
| `enterprise` (Go, commercial license, Phase 4) | SSO (OIDC/SAML protocol mechanics), RBAC storage (`internal/rbacstore`), session/service-token issuance (`internal/session`), the append-only audit log (`internal/audit`), and `enterprise-auth`'s HTTP surface (`/internal/authorize`, `/auth/features`). Never imported by core — see "Licensing boundary" below. Does **not** yet include per-tenant ClickHouse/Tantivy connection routing or the OIDC/SAML login HTTP handlers — see `/docs/security/threat-model.md`. |
| `web` (SvelteKit, static build) | Query bar, dashboards, alerts, and (Phase 4) a settings page that renders SSO status via a runtime capability check (`GET /auth/features`) rather than bundling enterprise-licensed components. |
| `cli` (`sentryctl`) | `ping`, `query`, `dashboards` (list/get/apply), `alerts` (list/get/apply). `$SENTRYCTL_TOKEN`, if set, is forwarded as a Bearer credential (Phase 4). |
| `deploy` | A Helm chart covering every `docker-compose.yml` service, plus (Phase 4) a small Go Operator managing one CRD (`Tenant`) that provisions a per-tenant ClickHouse credential Secret. Never applied to a live cluster in the environment this was built in — see `/deploy/README.md`'s verification section before trusting it. |
## Tenant isolation model (Phase 4)
Full design rationale: `/docs/phase-4-isolation-design.md`. Full honest
accounting of what's actually enforced vs. designed-only:
`/docs/security/threat-model.md` — read that before assuming any claim
below holds for log data specifically.
**As designed:** one dedicated ClickHouse database + narrowly-granted
user per tenant (never the shared `default`/admin credential), one
dedicated Tantivy index directory per tenant, `system.*` access revoked
per tenant, connections resolved from an immutable per-tenant map (never
a shared pool with session-level `USE`). Isolation lives at the
**connection layer** — every query, compiled or raw SQL, is forced
through a tenant-scoped connection the database's own access control
enforces — not at the query-compiler layer, since Phase 2's raw-SQL
escape hatch is opaque to any compiler-injected filter.
**As built, through Phase 4 task 8:**
- Role-based access control (`api/internal/authz`) is live on `/query`
and `/dashboards`, resolved via `enterprise-auth` over HTTP.
- Control-plane tenant scoping is live for dashboards
(`api/internal/dashboards`'s store filters every query by the
authenticated identity's tenant, never a client-supplied field).
- The `alerting``api` service-identity gap (task 2's finding) is
closed: a `RoleService` credential, distinct from every human role.
- **The connection-layer isolation itself — the actual design above —
is not built.** `api/internal/querylang/executor.SQLRunner`/
`SearchClient` and `search`'s gRPC service carry no tenant field
anywhere. There is one shared ClickHouse connection and one shared
Tantivy index for every tenant. RBAC controls *who* can run a query;
nothing yet controls *what data* that query can see.
- `deploy/operator`'s `Tenant` CRD manages only the K8s-side artifact (a
credential Secret) — it doesn't call ClickHouse or provision anything
ClickHouse-side. `enterprise/internal/tenantprovision` (the piece that
would) is unbuilt.
Building `enterprise/internal/chrunner` + `internal/searchclient` (the
tenant-scoped implementations of the two interfaces above) and wiring
them into `api/internal/queryapi.Handler` in place of the single shared
connection `api/cmd/api/main.go` opens today is the single largest
remaining gap between this system and the isolation model it was
designed to have.
## Licensing boundary
AGPLv3 for core + agents. Enterprise features (SSO, RBAC storage, audit
logging) live under `enterprise/` (commercial license stub, added
Phase 4). AGPL code must never import from `enterprise/` — enforced in
CI by `hack/check-tenant-boundary.sh`, which greps every build for the
import edge. Where core needs a decision only `enterprise/` can make
(is this request authorized, what SSO is configured), it calls
`enterprise-auth` over plain HTTP instead
(`api/internal/authz.HTTPAuthorizer`, `web`'s `GET /auth/features`) —
the same "network boundary, not import boundary" shape `/alerting``api`
already used before `enterprise/` existed.
## Non-negotiables carried from CLAUDE.md
- Rust agent: statically linked musl, `x86_64-unknown-linux-musl` and
`aarch64-unknown-linux-musl`, no glibc runtime deps.
- Windows support via native ETW/Event Log API, not WSL — designed
(Phase 1) but still unverified on real Windows hardware.
- Every UI action maps to a documented REST/gRPC call — no UI-only logic.
- Pinned stack (see CLAUDE.md table) — no substitutions without discussion.
## Explicitly out of scope (current, Phase 4)
Per `/CLAUDE.md`'s Phase 4 non-goals and `/docs/security/threat-model.md`:
deny-override permission grants, a data retention/deletion policy for
deprovisioned tenants, general multi-cluster orchestration in `/deploy`,
and any defense against a privileged ClickHouse/Postgres administrator —
every isolation and audit-integrity guarantee here is a structural
defense against application-layer bugs, not an operational control.
## Open questions for you to resolve
- Retention/TTL policy for the ClickHouse `logs` table — not specified yet,
deferred until storage sizing is a real concern.
- Exact OTel log schema field mapping (which OTel resource/log attributes
map to which ClickHouse columns) — Phase 0 uses a minimal subset
(timestamp, host, service, severity, message, attributes map); full
mapping deferred.
- mTLS certificate provisioning/rotation story for agents — Phase 0 will use
a static dev CA and manually issued certs; production PKI design is
out of scope here.