Files
cairnobs/deploy/README.md
T
jcoffey-dev 3037b31b0f Phase 4: Helm chart enforces api vs enterprise-api, closing the deployment-topology gap
deploy/helm/sentry/templates/api.yaml and the new enterprise-api.yaml
are mutually exclusive, gated on opposite sides of the same
enterprise.enabled flag -- exactly one renders, both as a Deployment+
Service named {{ .Release.Name }}-api on port 8080, so every consumer
(alerting's API_QUERY_URL, web's build args) needs zero conditional
logic of its own. This is the concrete fix for what the threat model
named as the single largest remaining gap once both storage engines'
isolation mechanisms were built: previously nothing forced or flagged
whether a deployment ran the tenant-isolated binary. Now the same flag
that turns on RBAC/audit/SSO also chooses the query binary.

Verified by parsing (not eyeballing) helm template's rendered output
under both value sets: exactly one sentry-api Deployment/Service either
way, with the right image, and kubeconform -strict clean against the
real Kubernetes 1.31 schema. Not applied to a live cluster (still no
cluster in this environment) -- docker-compose.yml also still runs
plain api unconditionally, so this enforcement is Helm-only for now.

Updated the threat model, architecture doc, CLAUDE.md, and deploy/
READMEs to reflect this and to name what's left: ingest has no tenant
concept for either storage engine (undesigned), and the Tenant CRD
(deploy/operator) and enterprise-api -provision-tenant are still two
separate, unreconciled provisioning mechanisms.
2026-08-14 06:20:20 -07:00

89 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown

# deploy
Kubernetes deployment for Sentry, added in Phase 4 (`/deploy` was
deliberately stubbed through Phase 3 -- see `/CLAUDE.md`'s Phase 3
non-goals). Two pieces:
- `operator/` -- a small Go controller-runtime Operator managing one CRD
(`Tenant`). See `operator/README.md`.
- `helm/sentry/` -- a Helm chart covering every `docker-compose.yml`
service, plus the operator and `Tenant` CRs when
`enterprise.enabled=true`. See `helm/sentry/README.md`.
## What "multi-tenant-aware" means here, precisely
Per `/docs/phase-4-isolation-design.md`, tenant isolation itself lives at
the **application layer** inside `enterprise/` (`enterprise-api` holds a
map of per-tenant ClickHouse connection pools via `internal/chrunner`;
`search` holds a map of per-tenant Tantivy indices via
`src/registry.rs`) -- not at the Kubernetes layer. This directory is
**not** "one Deployment per tenant" or a general multi-cluster system;
that's an explicit Phase 4 non-goal (see `/CLAUDE.md`). What it *does*
add:
- A `Tenant` CRD + controller that generates and manages one dedicated
ClickHouse credential Secret per tenant (`operator/internal/controller`).
- A Helm chart that can install zero-or-more `Tenant` CRs
(`values.tenants`) alongside the rest of the stack, and — the newer
piece — swaps `api`'s Deployment for `enterprise-api`'s whenever
`enterprise.enabled` is true, so which query binary actually serves
traffic is no longer a separately-forgettable decision (see
`helm/sentry/README.md`'s "`api` vs `enterprise-api`" section).
**Two still-separate mechanisms, not yet unified**: the Operator's
`Tenant` CRD manages only the K8s-side credential Secret — it does not
call ClickHouse (no `CREATE DATABASE`/`CREATE USER`/`GRANT`) or touch
the Tantivy filesystem. `enterprise-api -provision-tenant=<id>` is what
actually does that (`enterprise/internal/tenantprovision`, built and
tested — see `/enterprise/README.md`), driven independently via
`rbacstore`, not from the `Tenant` CRD's reconcile loop. A `Tenant`
reaching `status.phase: Active` here means "this tenant has a K8s
Secret," not "this tenant's ClickHouse database/grants exist" — running
both mechanisms for the same tenant ID today requires two separate
operator actions, named explicitly rather than implied to be one.
## Verification status -- read before trusting this against a real cluster
**Not verified against a live Kubernetes cluster.** This environment has
no `kubectl`/`kind`/`minikube`/`kubebuilder`/cluster reachable, so
nothing here has been `kubectl apply`'d or `helm install`'d for real.
Same disclosed-limitation shape as `/agent/README.md`'s "Windows-specific
agent code remains unverified on real Windows" from Phase 1 -- a real gap
to close before shipping, not swept under the rug.
What **was** actually verified, offline, in this environment (network
access was available to fetch these tools, but no cluster):
- `deploy/operator`: `go build`/`go vet`/`go test ./...` all pass,
including reconciler tests against controller-runtime's fake client
(`internal/controller/tenant_controller_test.go`) -- real reconcile
logic exercised, but not against a real apiserver (no `envtest`
binaries available; see that test file's doc comment).
- `deploy/operator/config/crd/sentry.io_tenants.yaml`: parsed with
`sigs.k8s.io/yaml` + strict-unmarshaled into the real
`k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver` `CustomResourceDefinition` Go type --
catches YAML syntax errors and structural mistakes, not a live-cluster
admission check.
- `deploy/helm/sentry`: `helm lint` passes; `helm template` renders
cleanly under both default values and a `enterprise.enabled: true` +
two-tenant override; the rendered output was checked with `kubeconform
-strict` against the real Kubernetes 1.31 OpenAPI schema for every
built-in resource kind (22-31 resources depending on values, 0
invalid) -- this catches schema mistakes (wrong field names, wrong
types) but not whether the resources actually reconcile correctly
together on a live cluster (Job/StatefulSet startup ordering, PVC
provisioning, actual pod scheduling). Specifically confirmed by
parsing the rendered YAML (not just eyeballing it): exactly one
`Deployment`/`Service` named `sentry-api` renders in each mode, with
the `enterprise.enabled: true` render using the `enterprise-api` image
and the default render using plain `api`'s.
- Docker image builds (`operator/Dockerfile` and every other
`Dockerfile` this chart references) were **not** verified in this
session -- Docker's daemon wasn't reachable here either (see the
Phase 4 task 5 conversation for why). Build and push every image this
chart's `values.yaml` references before installing it.
Before relying on this in production: `kind create cluster`, `helm
install` with `--include-crds`, and walk through
`helm/sentry/README.md`'s two-tenant example end to end.