State Coffey Labs as the copyright holder
Unlike the other four projects, cairnobs had no copyright statement to change. The Licensing section named the licence and pointed at LICENSE, but never said who holds the copyright, and there were no SPDX headers in the source either. That is a gap rather than a style choice: an AGPL project with no stated holder leaves the question open, and the licence's obligations are written around there being one. So this ADDS a line rather than replacing one. The two LINUXexpert-org references here are github.com issue and discussion links in CONTRIBUTING.md -- the repository's real path, unchanged. LICENSE untouched. Its only copyright is the FSF's on the AGPL text.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -158,6 +158,8 @@ update against. Tenant and RBAC resources are disclosed future work —
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
## Licensing
|
## Licensing
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Copyright (C) 2026 Coffey Labs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
AGPLv3, no exceptions — see [`LICENSE`](LICENSE). `enterprise/` was under a
|
AGPLv3, no exceptions — see [`LICENSE`](LICENSE). `enterprise/` was under a
|
||||||
commercial-license stub from Phase 4 through Phase 5; Phase 6 relicensed it to
|
commercial-license stub from Phase 4 through Phase 5; Phase 6 relicensed it to
|
||||||
match core. The full record and its business-model consequences are in
|
match core. The full record and its business-model consequences are in
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user