From ed2002b95f08ec081ccf6dc5818d60025618deb2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Coffey Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 01:30:18 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] State Coffey Labs as the copyright holder Unlike the other four projects, cairnobs had no copyright statement to change. The Licensing section named the licence and pointed at LICENSE, but never said who holds the copyright, and there were no SPDX headers in the source either. That is a gap rather than a style choice: an AGPL project with no stated holder leaves the question open, and the licence's obligations are written around there being one. So this ADDS a line rather than replacing one. The two LINUXexpert-org references here are github.com issue and discussion links in CONTRIBUTING.md -- the repository's real path, unchanged. LICENSE untouched. Its only copyright is the FSF's on the AGPL text. --- README.md | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 7d6f3d4..999c2ac 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -158,6 +158,8 @@ update against. Tenant and RBAC resources are disclosed future work — ## Licensing +Copyright (C) 2026 Coffey Labs. + AGPLv3, no exceptions — see [`LICENSE`](LICENSE). `enterprise/` was under a commercial-license stub from Phase 4 through Phase 5; Phase 6 relicensed it to match core. The full record and its business-model consequences are in