State Coffey Labs as the copyright holder

Unlike the other four projects, cairnobs had no copyright statement to change.
The Licensing section named the licence and pointed at LICENSE, but never said
who holds the copyright, and there were no SPDX headers in the source either.

That is a gap rather than a style choice: an AGPL project with no stated holder
leaves the question open, and the licence's obligations are written around
there being one. So this ADDS a line rather than replacing one.

The two LINUXexpert-org references here are github.com issue and discussion
links in CONTRIBUTING.md -- the repository's real path, unchanged.

LICENSE untouched. Its only copyright is the FSF's on the AGPL text.
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-30 01:30:18 -07:00
parent 464eeea711
commit ed2002b95f
+2
View File
@@ -158,6 +158,8 @@ update against. Tenant and RBAC resources are disclosed future work —
## Licensing ## Licensing
Copyright (C) 2026 Coffey Labs.
AGPLv3, no exceptions — see [`LICENSE`](LICENSE). `enterprise/` was under a AGPLv3, no exceptions — see [`LICENSE`](LICENSE). `enterprise/` was under a
commercial-license stub from Phase 4 through Phase 5; Phase 6 relicensed it to commercial-license stub from Phase 4 through Phase 5; Phase 6 relicensed it to
match core. The full record and its business-model consequences are in match core. The full record and its business-model consequences are in