inbuxa-server

209 Commits 2 Branches 3 Tags

3 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
jcoffey-dev	7d2c2d2322	Point links at git.coffeylabs.org after the move from GitHub ci / build (pull_request) Successful in 6m51s Details GitHub took the organization's repos and GHCR offline on 2026-09-20. Repo, release, raw-file and clone links now go to Gitea at git.coffeylabs.org, container images to registry.coffeylabs.org, and GitLab-style /-/blob paths to Gitea's /src/branch form. Go module paths are identifiers and stay as they are; links to GitHub issues and pull requests are left as history.	2026-09-22 09:08:33 -07:00
jcoffey-dev	a63839f6b0	The repository's own .github, now that it is public SPEC 2.2a says INBUXA writes its own when the repository is first published, and it is. Until now the public repository carried Stalwart's: a security policy telling people to report vulnerabilities to Stalwart Labs, and a contributing guide whose policy is that pull requests from anyone not on upstream's vouched list are closed automatically. Neither is this project's, and both were being offered to anyone who looked. So: a security policy that says where to send a report, and what happens if it turns out to be upstream's bug rather than ours; a contributing guide that says what a fork of someone else's code needs from a contributor, including the clean-room question, since the record has to stay true; the Contributor Covenant; and a sponsor link. Upstream's two security documents move to .github-upstream/ beside its workflows -- kept, not used, not presented as ours. CI builds the server and compiles every test target, and deliberately runs no suite. The unit tests only build with the integration crate in the graph, and the integration suites want a STORE, fixed ports and a container apiece, so running them here would mean a tick that skipped everything or a cross that means "the runner has no Redis". The workflow says as much, so nobody has to rediscover it. Also ignores /artifact: two hand-built binaries, ~190 MB, one `git add -A` away from a public repository.	2026-09-20 00:00:05 -07:00
jcoffey-dev	7dae9b29fd	Import upstream v0.16.22, stripped Upstream commit: 474dd0229cb20cf513036619781ed97bd8073c3f Enterprise-only files removed or emptied: 63 Enterprise-only snippets removed: 117 in 50 files Dangling module declarations removed: 5 Cargo edits turning enterprise off: 14 Verification: clean Enterprise feature gates left for rebuilt features: 19 in 18 files Produced by tools/fork/strip.py. The full report is in docs/fork/strip-reports/ on main.	2026-09-18 10:21:56 -07:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

jcoffey-dev

7d2c2d2322

Point links at git.coffeylabs.org after the move from GitHub

ci / build (pull_request) Successful in 6m51s

Details

GitHub took the organization's repos and GHCR offline on 2026-09-20. Repo,
release, raw-file and clone links now go to Gitea at git.coffeylabs.org,
container images to registry.coffeylabs.org, and GitLab-style /-/blob paths
to Gitea's /src/branch form. Go module paths are identifiers and stay as
they are; links to GitHub issues and pull requests are left as history.

2026-09-22 09:08:33 -07:00

jcoffey-dev

a63839f6b0

The repository's own .github, now that it is public

SPEC 2.2a says INBUXA writes its own when the repository is first published,
and it is. Until now the public repository carried Stalwart's: a security
policy telling people to report vulnerabilities to Stalwart Labs, and a
contributing guide whose policy is that pull requests from anyone not on
upstream's vouched list are closed automatically. Neither is this project's,
and both were being offered to anyone who looked.

So: a security policy that says where to send a report, and what happens if
it turns out to be upstream's bug rather than ours; a contributing guide that
says what a fork of someone else's code needs from a contributor, including
the clean-room question, since the record has to stay true; the Contributor
Covenant; and a sponsor link. Upstream's two security documents move to
.github-upstream/ beside its workflows -- kept, not used, not presented as
ours.

CI builds the server and compiles every test target, and deliberately runs
no suite. The unit tests only build with the integration crate in the graph,
and the integration suites want a STORE, fixed ports and a container apiece,
so running them here would mean a tick that skipped everything or a cross
that means "the runner has no Redis". The workflow says as much, so nobody
has to rediscover it.

Also ignores /artifact: two hand-built binaries, ~190 MB, one `git add -A`
away from a public repository.

2026-09-20 00:00:05 -07:00

jcoffey-dev

7dae9b29fd

Import upstream v0.16.22, stripped

Upstream commit: 474dd0229cb20cf513036619781ed97bd8073c3f
Enterprise-only files removed or emptied: 63
Enterprise-only snippets removed: 117 in 50 files
Dangling module declarations removed: 5
Cargo edits turning enterprise off: 14
Verification: clean
Enterprise feature gates left for rebuilt features: 19 in 18 files

Produced by tools/fork/strip.py. The full report is in docs/fork/strip-reports/ on main.

2026-09-18 10:21:56 -07:00