Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jcoffey-dev 7e7eca0883 Explain: shorter answers, streamed, remembered, and prepared for settings
ci / fork-checks (pull_request) Successful in 1m31s
ci / build (pull_request) Failing after 5m18s
ai-explain spec, amendment 1 (EX-22 to EX-28):
- answers are three or four sentences, max_tokens 160, cut at 700 chars;
- POST /api/explain streams the answer as server-sent events;
- each node remembers answers in memory (1,000, 24 h), keyed by the facts,
  prompt version and model, shared by server-level administrators;
- resources/explain/settings.json.gz ships answers for settings at their
  defaults, generated with prepare_setting_explanations (717 for 2026.9.27);
- the system prompt no longer carries the per-request marker, so a model
  server can reuse it;
- inbuxa:Explanation gains source, answeredAt and preparedFor.
2026-09-26 16:11:43 -07:00
jcoffey-dev d9a6db025b Explain this: the local model reads delivery failures, verdicts, logs and settings
ci / fork-checks (pull_request) Successful in 48s
ci / build (pull_request) Successful in 9m4s
A new method, inbuxa:Explanation/set, asks the node's local model for a
short plain-words reading of one thing an administrator is looking at:
a failed recipient in the queue, a Classify verdict, a log line or trace
event, or one setting with its saved value. The server builds the prompt
itself from stored data and the registry schema, never from text the
console sends, and grounds SMTP replies in RFC 3463 and RFC 5321.

What the model is never shown: secrets (including ones nested inside a
setting, like an AI model's HTTP auth), raw protocol events, and the
contents of any other event. A tag name that doesn't have a tag's shape is
refused before a model is asked.

Calls share the AI gate with spam classification, but mail always keeps
its slot, and Explain has its own hourly count per account and its own
on/off switch in inbuxa:AiLimits. The permission is sysAiExplain,
superuser only; tenant administrators can't use it. The session carries
an aiExplain flag so a console knows when to offer the button.

An install whose roles were stored before the permission existed gets it
added once, at start-up, to the roles that are administrators' alone,
not the User role their defaults share with every account. An operator
who removes it later isn't overruled.

Tests: unit tests in inbuxa-features and jmap, and ai_explain_tests
(run with --ignored) covering the acceptance tests and the upgrade.
2026-09-26 00:52:51 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 9490fc4677 AI spam classification: the model's opinion as one bounded spam signal, and the llm_prompt Sieve function (AI-1 to AI-28)
The classifier sends only the subject and text, between unforgeable markers
after the operator's prompt, to an OpenAI-compatible endpoint the operator
configured; nothing is preset. Its answer maps to an LLM_ tag whose score is
clamped (+5.0, -1.0 by default) and can never discard or reject on its own;
X-Spam-LLM is sanitized, encoded and folded, and a planted one is removed.
Failures, timeouts past the ceiling, a full slot or a paused model leave
mail flowing untagged. llm_prompt answers trusted scripts, and accounts
holding interactAi within an hourly limit. Redirects aren't followed and no
content or secret is logged. The limits live in inbuxa:AiLimits.
Acceptance tests 1 and 3 to 21; test 2 as the re-enabled shared llm case,
whose setup no longer waits on a rules file from a developer's own path;
test 22 written as the ignored ai_compat.
2026-09-19 00:41:00 -07:00