Run from a copy of the stopped server's RocksDB store. Eight green lines,
which are worth reading carefully: six carry weight, and masked_email and
undelete carry none, because there are no masked addresses and retention is
off, so they iterate an empty list. tenant_compat checked the tenant, its
quotas and its members, but not what a tenant administrator can see, which
needs a --tenant-admin recording.
ai_compat is the one that might have looked vacuous and isn't: the twelve
LLM_ tags are there with the scores that were observed.
Three things had to be fixed first, each failing all eight identically and
none about the data: listener names, privileged ports, pending tasks. The
next import's copy will bring the same three, so they are written down.
SPEC §7: cutover steps 1 to 3 are met. Step 4 remains.
The run against INBUXA's store hung printing "Waiting for pending task
AcmeRenewal(...)": the copy carries that server's task queue, and a renewal
due in 2026-11 will not come due while a test watches it.
Under NO_INSERT the wait now skips tasks that aren't due and ones that have
permanently failed, which leaves the tasks the test itself caused — a
restore in undelete_compat comes due at once — and gives up after a minute
with the offending task printed. A test that was really waiting on its own
work now fails on its assertion, which says more than a spinner.
Ordinary runs are untouched: system_tests, which waits on tasks throughout,
still passes in 135s.
The first run against INBUXA's store failed all eight tests identically,
before reading a single record: the copy carries that server's listeners on
25, 443, 465, 587, 110, 143, 993 and 995, and nothing in a test run is
root, so each one failed with "Permission denied (os error 13)".
The builder now remembers the listeners it adds, and under NO_INSERT drops
build errors for any it didn't. Every other error still stands, including a
bind failing on one of its own, so this can't hide the case where the
harness's own port is taken.
The copy isn't edited for this: its listeners are simply not what a compat
run needs, and it reaches the server over the compat- ones instead. Checked
that a NO_INSERT run still boots and that scim_tests, which takes the
ordinary path, still passes.
Rehearsed the run against a real RocksDB store, and it died at startup
before checking anything: the harness inserts listeners of its own, the
registry keys them by name, and a real server already has a "jmap" and an
"imap". The message was "Primary key conflict on property name with
existing object NetworkListener", which says nothing about what to do.
Under NO_INSERT the harness now calls its listeners compat-jmap and so on,
and the same run gets through to the test's own checks.
run-compat.sh copies the store for each test and removes the copy after,
because several of these write to what they open: monitoring_compat purges
the history it reads and undelete_compat restores what it finds. The source
stays untouched, which matters when it is the only copy of a production
store anyone took that day.
INBUXA runs RocksDB, so a copy is a directory copy. The SQL backends would
need more than this: the harness builds its own container and connects to
fixed local credentials, so it cannot open a dump in place.
record-compat.py ran against the live server as a server-level
administrator: 8 accounts, which matches the dashboard, so it reached all
of them. One tenant with its quotas and members; no masked addresses, no
archived items.
The empty files are right rather than short. INBUXA has no masked
addresses and retention is off, so masked_email_compat and undelete_compat
iterate an empty list: they pass without comparing anything, which is worth
saying plainly, because a green run from either would otherwise read as
evidence of compatibility. That puts them where scim_compat and
per_domain_directory_compat already sit.
So one recording carries weight, expected.json, and it is made. SPEC §7's
cutover steps 2 and 3 come down to the tenant, the domains and the
accounts until either feature is switched on.
Three of the eight compat tests check INBUXA's data against a recording of
how the Enterprise server read it, and that recording can only be made
while that server is still up. SPEC §7 gives it 45 days from the notice, so
the capture shouldn't wait on the cutover being scheduled.
record-compat.py writes all three files: the tenants with their quotas and
members and what each tenant administrator sees, every masked address and
its state, and every archived item whole, since undelete_compat compares
every property it recorded. It only reads, and refuses to send a method
that isn't /get or /query, because it is the one tool here that runs
against the live server. Queries follow their pages, so a server that caps
one doesn't leave a short recording behind.
Exercised against the fork's own test server, which answers the same JMAP:
3 tenants with members, 8 masked addresses and 3 archived items, each in
the shape its test reads.
None of the eight had ever executed, so all eight ran against an empty store
with synthetic inputs. The plumbing works: the documented JSON shapes parse,
and NO_INSERT stops each one before the harness touches the store, which a
sentinel file in each store directory confirmed — it survived every run,
including the one launched without NO_INSERT.
Two things the runbook got wrong, both of which would have cost a day on the
day the copy exists:
- TMPDIR is the copy's parent, not the copy. The harness opens
$TMPDIR/<test name>, so a TMPDIR pointing at the copy gets an empty store
created beside it and the test calls INBUXA's data missing.
- masked_email_compat and undelete_compat need INBUXA_COMPAT_MASKS and
INBUXA_COMPAT_ARCHIVED, which only the tests' doc comments mentioned.
Every run ended on a 401 raised as "Missing list in response", which reads
as INBUXA's data being wrong when the login is what's wrong. Each test now
authenticates once first and names the variable that failed.
`cargo test -p tests` runs none of the fork's own feature suites except
what's inside `system_tests`: SCIM, per-domain directories, the sharded
stores and the four replica suites are all ignored, each needing a
container, a STORE the harness only builds on request, or both. The
runbook lists what each one needs, and the container-reuse trap.
docs/spec/compat-tests.md lists each compat test, what it needs, what it
checks and what a failure means, and says plainly that they run against a
copy only, since the monitoring one purges the history it reads. The
scale-out and per-domain statuses record the acceptance tests that now
run.
jcoffey-dev