Setting deliverAt on an internal DMARC or TLS report wrote the new task
queue row with the report's object type (0x21, 0x6e) instead of the task
type (7, 8), and left the task row at its old due. The task manager's scan
failed on that row with store.data-corruption ("Failed to iterate over task
queue"), and because the error ended the whole scan, every task due after
the row stopped running on every node.
- reschedule_ops writes the new queue row through schedule_task_with_id, so
it carries the task type and the task row gets the new due. It removes
the row the task is actually queued under (the task's due, which differs
from deliverAt once the task has been retried) and any row an earlier
reschedule left at deliverAt.
- x:DmarcInternalReport/set and x:TlsInternalReport/set lock the report's
task while they move it, as x:Task/set does, refuse while the report is
being sent, release the locks however the request ends, and wake the task
manager.
- The task manager logs a queue row it can't read (id, due, key, value) and
skips it instead of ending the scan. It then repairs the row from its task:
the row is rewritten with the task's type, and a row with no task behind
it is removed. A row holding a report's object type for a report task is
what the old reschedule wrote: the task is moved to that row's time, as
the reschedule intended, and its old queue row is removed. Stores that
already hold such a row recover on their own once it comes due.
- x:Task/query with a type filter skips an unreadable row instead of
failing.
Test: smtp::reporting::reschedule (RocksDB and PostgreSQL). It fails on
main: x:Task/get shows the old due, and with that check removed, neither
report nor a later task ever runs.
The AGPL asks a modified version to carry prominent notices saying it was
modified, and giving a date. Publishing the source is the conveyance that
asks for it, so it wants doing before the repository is public rather than
at the release.
Every upstream file the fork changed now says so in its header, beneath the
notice it came with: 164 files, found by diffing against the upstream
snapshot branch rather than by guessing, so the list is what actually
differs. Files the fork wrote itself already carry their own copyright and
need nothing. Upstream's notices are untouched, which its licence requires
and which was already true.
The README says the same thing in prose, since the obligation is on the
work as a whole and not only its Rust files.
Builds unchanged: the server and the test binary both compile.
Every one of the 14 was `#[cfg(not(feature = "enterprise"))]` on the arm the
fork always compiles: the Enterprise arms went with the import, and nothing
turns the feature on. Removing the attribute leaves the same code, now
unconditional, in 11 files.
Two of them looked like behavior worth checking before touching: the
`validate_tenant_quota` stub that always passes, and the refusal to cancel a
pending DestroyAccount task. The stub is vestigial — the rebuilt
multi-tenancy enforces quotas in `crates/features/src/tenancy/quota.rs` for
those objects and more — and the refusal is undelete's open question, which
this change leaves exactly as it was.
The binary builds with no new warnings, and `system_tests` and `jmap_tests`,
which cover the touched registry, task-manager and auth paths, both pass.
The feature definitions stay in the manifests, inert: taking them out would
widen every sync's diff for nothing.
Upstream commit: 474dd0229cb20cf513036619781ed97bd8073c3f
Enterprise-only files removed or emptied: 63
Enterprise-only snippets removed: 117 in 50 files
Dangling module declarations removed: 5
Cargo edits turning enterprise off: 14
Verification: clean
Enterprise feature gates left for rebuilt features: 19 in 18 files
Produced by tools/fork/strip.py. The full report is in docs/fork/strip-reports/ on main.