Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jcoffey-dev fb785b8635 Who may share mail: a server switch, and a tenant's that can only be stricter
ci / github (pull_request) Skipped
ci / fork-checks (pull_request) Successful in 15s
ci / build (pull_request) Successful in 4m6s
github/ci (branch) GitHub Actions
A school, or any organization that doesn't want people's mailboxes
shared, can now turn that off (multi-account spec, MA-C). Two switches
at two levels, as the legacy-protocols switch has:

- mailSharing: people may share their own mail folders;
- addAccounts: people may add other accounts to the webmail (read by
  the webmail's account switcher, MA-B).

inbuxa:SharingPolicy/get and /set hold them: the server's policy has
the singleton id, each tenant's has the tenant's id. Both default to
on, so nothing changes until someone turns one off. A tenant's
administrator changes their own tenant's (the domain's permissions, as
for its protocols switch); only a server administrator with
sysSharingUpdate changes the server's; a tenant can never be looser
than the server (forbidden). Every change goes through the audit log,
and rebuilds every access token, here and on every node.

With mail sharing off for an account's tenant (or the server):

- Mailbox/set and IMAP SETACL refuse to start or widen a share
  (forbidden / NO [NOPERM]); narrowing or ending one is always allowed;
- shares already made give nothing while it is off: an access token
  leaves out mailbox grants from such an owner. They stay stored, so
  turning sharing back on restores them (John, 2026-10-05);
- a lock's and a shared mailbox's grants are an administrator's and
  always count, and group membership was never a share.

The session's own account says mailSharing and addAccounts, the
stricter of the two levels, so front ends can hide what is off.

Tests: a new sharing_policy suite with a school tenant, its own
administrator and two people outside it: on by default; the school's
administrator turns it off but can't touch the server's; an old share
stops working and a new one is refused while someone outside the school
is unaffected; a shared mailbox in the school keeps working; the server
off can't be loosened by the tenant; on again restores the old share;
ending a share works while off; and every change is audited. A unit
test covers the stricter-only rule. sharing_policy_tests, jmap_tests,
imap_tests, account_lock_tests and audit_log_tests pass (RocksDB).
2026-10-05 16:00:09 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 2d8728793c Don't let a group's members share its mailboxes on
ci / github (pull_request) Skipped
ci / fork-checks (pull_request) Failing after 1m16s
ci / build (pull_request) Canceled after 5m6s
A group's members reach its mailbox through membership, which counts
as owning the account, so every ACL check was skipped: on a scratch
server a member gave an outsider read access to the group's Inbox with
one Mailbox/set shareWith, with no administrator involved and nothing
audited. Who is in a group is an administrator's decision.

AccessToken::is_group_member_only names that case (in the account
only through a group, without Impersonate). For such a member:

- Mailbox/set with a shareWith change, on create or update, is
  refused as forbidden;
- IMAP SETACL and DELETEACL answer NO [NOPERM];
- myRights reports mayShare false, and MYRIGHTS leaves out "a";
  every other right stays.

Administrators and the account itself are unchanged. The JMAP ACL
test's group section now checks all three for a member and that the
outsider still has nothing (specs/multi-account.md, MA-D0, G1).

jmap_tests and imap_tests pass (RocksDB). The IMAP refusal has no test
of its own yet; imap_tests passing shows the rest is unchanged.
2026-10-05 14:15:58 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 6a53d47106 Mark the files this fork changed (AGPL section 5(a))
The AGPL asks a modified version to carry prominent notices saying it was
modified, and giving a date. Publishing the source is the conveyance that
asks for it, so it wants doing before the repository is public rather than
at the release.

Every upstream file the fork changed now says so in its header, beneath the
notice it came with: 164 files, found by diffing against the upstream
snapshot branch rather than by guessing, so the list is what actually
differs. Files the fork wrote itself already carry their own copyright and
need nothing. Upstream's notices are untouched, which its licence requires
and which was already true.

The README says the same thing in prose, since the obligation is on the
work as a whole and not only its Rust files.

Builds unchanged: the server and the test binary both compile.
2026-09-19 23:48:35 -07:00
jcoffey-dev bcf4a49325 Multi-tenancy: sharing grants stay within the owner's tenant (MT-1, MT-3)
JMAP shareWith refuses a grantee outside the owner's tenant, or missing, with
invalidForeignKey naming the account. WebDAV ACL answers AllowedPrincipal and
IMAP SETACL answers as for an unknown account.
2026-09-18 15:20:04 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 7dae9b29fd Import upstream v0.16.22, stripped
Upstream commit: 474dd0229cb20cf513036619781ed97bd8073c3f
Enterprise-only files removed or emptied: 63
Enterprise-only snippets removed: 117 in 50 files
Dangling module declarations removed: 5
Cargo edits turning enterprise off: 14
Verification: clean
Enterprise feature gates left for rebuilt features: 19 in 18 files

Produced by tools/fork/strip.py. The full report is in docs/fork/strip-reports/ on main.
2026-09-18 10:21:56 -07:00