Community files and CI, now that the repository is public
It had none: no security policy, no contributing guide, no code of conduct, no sponsor link, and no CI. A public repository with an administrative interface in it should at least say where to send a vulnerability, so that part names what is worth reporting here specifically -- a session acting beyond its permissions, one tenant's data reaching another, a token landing somewhere that outlives the session -- and where a report goes if it turns out to belong to the server or to upstream. CI is what a contributor can run: typecheck, lint, test, build. Nothing in it needs a live server, so a red run means the code, not the runner.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
version: 2
|
||||
updates:
|
||||
# One npm entry at the root, where the single lockfile is.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Minor and patch arrive as one pull request a week. Majors are left out of
|
||||
# the group on purpose: they are migrations rather than bumps, and each one
|
||||
# deserves its own pull request and its own CI run.
|
||||
- package-ecosystem: npm
|
||||
directory: "/"
|
||||
schedule:
|
||||
interval: weekly
|
||||
day: tuesday
|
||||
time: "09:00"
|
||||
timezone: Etc/UTC
|
||||
open-pull-requests-limit: 5
|
||||
groups:
|
||||
minor-and-patch:
|
||||
update-types:
|
||||
- minor
|
||||
- patch
|
||||
- package-ecosystem: github-actions
|
||||
directory: "/"
|
||||
schedule:
|
||||
interval: weekly
|
||||
day: tuesday
|
||||
time: "09:00"
|
||||
timezone: Etc/UTC
|
||||
groups:
|
||||
actions:
|
||||
patterns:
|
||||
- "*"
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user