Adding a filter from a message reported success while the script on the
server never held more than two rules (#76). Rules were being destroyed,
and the confirmation was a lie.
Three links, each defensible alone:
1. load() recorded a *failed* blob fetch as `contents[id] = ""`.
2. sieveToRules("") returns [] -- "this script has no rules", which is
indistinguishable from "we could not read this script".
3. Saving rewrites the whole script from that baseline, so every rule
already in it was deleted. The write itself succeeded, which is why
the UI said so.
No fetch failure was even required: rules() did `contents[id] ?? ""`, so
a script whose content had not loaded yet read as empty too. And
saveScript cached the content it had just written and then called
load(), which replaced the whole map -- discarding it if the refetch
came back short.
The fix is to keep "unknown" and "empty" apart at every step:
- a failed fetch leaves the key absent rather than storing ""
- load() merges rather than replacing, so a reload cannot throw away
what saveScript just wrote
- rules() returns null for content it does not have, which every
caller already treats as "do not touch this script"
- saveRules refuses outright when the baseline is unknown. Refusing is
recoverable; overwriting is not.
rules() now also reports whether the script was read, because "written
by hand" and "could not be read" want different advice -- one is
permanent, the other is a reload away, and telling someone the wrong one
sends them hunting for a problem they do not have.
Ruled out on the way: the rule codec round-trips fine, eight rules in
and eight out. sieveToRules reads the `# rule:` JSON comments rather
than parsing Sieve, so the generated script's shape was never the issue.
jcoffey-dev
9c37af7b07