Files
ihasmail-inbuxa/.github/workflows/release.yml
T
jcoffey-dev 25763832f3 Publish to INBUXA's own image, and don't release on a schedule yet
Two things inherited from public ihasmail that became live the moment this
repository went public.

publish.yml pushed ghcr.io/coffey-labs/ihasmail -- the image every public
ihasmail install pulls. A release here would have published INBUXA's webmail
over it, which is the exact confusion SPEC 5 exists to prevent. It now
publishes ghcr.io/inbuxa/ihasmail-inbuxa.

release.yml cuts a release every Monday at 09:17 UTC, which public ihasmail
wants because it has users expecting one. This fork has none yet, and the
release triggers the publish, so on Monday it would have shipped an image
and mailed everyone watching about a product that has not shipped. Scheduled
runs now stop at the first job; a release can still be cut by hand, and the
weekly one comes back by removing one line.
2026-09-20 00:01:02 -07:00

173 lines
7.2 KiB
YAML

# Cut a release once a week, but only if there is something in it.
#
# Releases had drifted 184 commits behind main, which made `:latest` describe
# a build nobody was running -- the demo, prod and anyone building from source
# were all ahead of it. Publishing on release is the right trigger only if
# releases actually happen, so this is the part that makes that true without
# anyone having to remember.
#
# It does nothing on a quiet week. A release with no commits in it is worse
# than no release: it moves `:latest` to an identical build, spends a version
# number, and mails everybody watching the repository about nothing.
name: Weekly release
on:
# inbuxa: the weekly schedule is off in this fork until INBUXA releases.
# Public ihasmail cuts one a week because it has users expecting it; this
# fork has none yet, and a scheduled release here would publish an image
# and mail everyone watching about a product that has not shipped. Cut one
# by hand with workflow_dispatch; restore the weekly one at release by
# removing the `if:` on the `check` job below.
schedule:
# Mondays, 09:17 UTC. GitHub runs scheduled jobs on a best-effort basis and
# can delay a run by a good while when the queue is busy, so do not read
# the exact minute as a promise. The odd minute is deliberate: the top of
# the hour is when most schedules fire, and at 09:00 the first scheduled
# run started almost six hours late and the second had not started at all
# four and a half hours in. Moving off the hour does not make GitHub keep
# time, but it stops competing for the busiest slot. A missed week can be
# cut by hand with workflow_dispatch; a late scheduled run that follows
# finds the tag already there and does nothing.
#
# Note also that GitHub disables scheduled workflows in a repository with
# no activity for 60 days -- not a concern while this one is being worked
# on weekly, but it is why a silent stop is worth checking for before
# assuming the file is broken.
- cron: "17 9 * * 1"
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
dry_run:
description: "Work out what would be released, then stop"
type: boolean
default: false
# One at a time. Two overlapping runs would race to create the same tag, and
# the loser fails noisily for a reason that has nothing to do with the code.
concurrency:
group: weekly-release
cancel-in-progress: false
jobs:
check:
# inbuxa: scheduled runs stop here until INBUXA releases; a run started by
# hand goes through. Remove this line to let the weekly one resume.
if: github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch'
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
outputs:
should_release: ${{ steps.decide.outputs.should_release }}
tag: ${{ steps.decide.outputs.tag }}
title: ${{ steps.decide.outputs.title }}
sha: ${{ steps.decide.outputs.sha }}
previous: ${{ steps.decide.outputs.previous }}
count: ${{ steps.decide.outputs.count }}
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
with:
ref: main
fetch-depth: 0
- uses: actions/setup-node@820762786026740c76f36085b0efc47a31fe5020 # v7.0.0
with:
node-version: 26
- id: decide
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
set -euo pipefail
# The newest published release, or empty on a repository that has
# never had one -- in which case everything counts as new. Drafts are
# excluded: an unpublished draft is not a release anybody has, so
# counting from it would hide commits that have never shipped.
previous="$(gh release list --limit 1 --exclude-drafts --json tagName --jq '.[0].tagName // ""')"
# A tag named by a release is normally present after a full checkout,
# but a release can outlive its tag. Falling back to the whole
# history is the safe direction to be wrong in: it over-counts, which
# cuts a release that was due anyway, where under-counting would skip
# one that was.
if [ -n "$previous" ] && git rev-parse -q --verify "refs/tags/${previous}" >/dev/null; then
count="$(git rev-list --count "${previous}..HEAD")"
else
count="$(git rev-list --count HEAD)"
fi
version="$(node scripts/version.mjs)"
# A Docker tag may not contain '+', and neither should the git tag,
# so the two always agree about what to call a build.
tag="v${version/+/-}"
title="v${version%%+*}"
sha="$(git rev-parse HEAD)"
should_release=true
reason=""
if [ "$count" -eq 0 ]; then
should_release=false
reason="no commits since ${previous}"
elif git rev-parse -q --verify "refs/tags/${tag}" >/dev/null; then
# Same commit, different week: the version is derived from the
# commit, so nothing new means the tag already exists.
should_release=false
reason="tag ${tag} already exists"
fi
{
echo "should_release=$should_release"
echo "tag=$tag"
echo "title=$title"
echo "sha=$sha"
echo "previous=$previous"
echo "count=$count"
} >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
# Written to the run summary so a skipped week reads as a decision
# rather than as a workflow that quietly did nothing.
{
echo "### Weekly release"
echo
if [ "$should_release" = "true" ]; then
echo "Releasing **${tag}** — ${count} commit(s) since ${previous:-the beginning}."
else
echo "Nothing to release: ${reason}."
fi
} >> "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
cut:
needs: check
if: needs.check.outputs.should_release == 'true' && !inputs.dry_run
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: write
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
with:
ref: main
fetch-depth: 0
- env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
set -euo pipefail
args=(--target "${{ needs.check.outputs.sha }}"
--title "${{ needs.check.outputs.title }}"
--generate-notes)
# Bound the notes to what is actually new. Without a start tag the
# generator reaches back to whatever it decides is previous, which on
# a repository with older tag shapes is not always the last release.
if [ -n "${{ needs.check.outputs.previous }}" ]; then
args+=(--notes-start-tag "${{ needs.check.outputs.previous }}")
fi
gh release create "${{ needs.check.outputs.tag }}" "${args[@]}"
# Called rather than left to the `release` trigger on purpose: see the note
# at the top of publish.yml. A release created with GITHUB_TOKEN raises no
# event, so without this the tag would exist and no image would follow it.
publish:
needs: [check, cut]
permissions:
contents: read
packages: write
uses: ./.github/workflows/publish.yml
with:
ref: ${{ needs.check.outputs.sha }}
tag_latest: true