The groundwork in #145 gave the app a language to serve. This gives it
something to serve, and a way to measure the distance to the languages
actually planned.
The English text is the key. `t("Archive")` looks "Archive" up and returns the
English when it is not there, which buys three things worth more than tidy
symbolic keys: no English catalogue to keep in step with the code, a missing
translation that degrades to readable English rather than to
`mail.list.archive`, and an extraction step that is wrapping a string rather
than inventing a name for it. Names are where extraction stalls, and 55
components is a lot of small naming arguments. The cost is that editing English
copy orphans its translations, which is the right way round: the copy is the
product, and a stale German sentence should fall back to the new English.
`plural()` takes forms rather than (one, other), because two forms is an
English assumption that does not survive phase two of the plan. Russian and
Ukrainian need three, and choosing between them is not a question about the
number 1. Intl.PluralRules knows the rule for every language the browser knows,
so the catalogue supplies the forms and the runtime picks; a category the
catalogue does not carry falls back to `other` rather than rendering undefined.
Interpolation is named rather than positional for the same reason -- German
moves the parts of a sentence around and means the same thing.
Catalogues are dynamically imported, so a reader who never leaves English never
downloads one, and English needs no fetch at all. `applyLang` sets the lang
attribute before kicking the load, deliberately: lang is what stops Chrome
offering to translate and should not wait on a network request to say something
it already knows.
`t()` is a plain function, not a hook, so the tree is keyed on a language
version at the root and thrown away when the catalogue changes. Making every
call site a subscriber would turn extracting a string from "wrap it" into "wrap
it and add a hook", for an event that happens about once per account.
NotificationsSettings is extracted end to end as the reference -- it covers all
four shapes, being JSX text, translated attributes, a toast, and a sentence
with a value interpolated into it.
scripts/i18n-coverage.mjs counts what is left, because ~1,000 strings across 56
files is too many to eyeball in review or carry in anyone's head. It reports 20
wrapped and 925 remaining, and it deliberately does not count punctuation and
separators as untranslated -- a floor no amount of work could reach would make
the number useless. A progress report rather than a gate: --check exits
non-zero, for once the number is low enough for that to mean something.
ROADMAP.md said translations were "English-only for now" on a page whose stated
purpose is things the answer is "no" to. It now says what is actually happening,
carries the phase order, and says why Arabic, Hebrew and Persian are on neither
list: RTL is a layout and bidi problem rather than a longer catalogue, and
shipping it as though it were the same kind of work is how an RTL build ends up
unusable with nobody saying so.
Both the versioning comment and the README described 1.0 in the past
tense, which reads as though it has shipped and the numbering was
changed in response. It has not. The old `2.16.x` scheme was dropped
over where it would end up, not where it ended up, and the surrounding
conditionals are simplified to match: "would sort", "would read", rather
than "would have".
The badge quoted in the comment also said 0.16.19; it says 0.16.20 now.
Comments and prose only -- no behaviour changes.
The middle field was the Stalwart generation a build targeted -- 16 for
0.16 -- which leaves nowhere to go when Stalwart reaches 1.0. There is no
honest value for it: 2.1 sorts below the 2.16 already deployed, so every
image and About screen would have read as a downgrade. Tying our
numbering to somebody else's was the mistake, and which Stalwart a build
needs is said properly in the README badge and KNOWN-ISSUES, where it can
be precise rather than one digit.
The version is now the date of the commit it was built from, and the pull
request moves after the + as build metadata. It is provenance rather than
a rank: at the rate they merge here it climbs without bound and says
nothing about how new a build is. Everything after the + is ignored when
versions are compared, which reads correctly -- two builds from the same
day differ in where they came from, not in age -- and nothing depends on
that comparison anyway, since images are pruned by creation time and a
rollback names a git ref.
The date is the commit's own, so rebuilding an old commit gives the
version it had the first time. package.json is no longer the source of
anything and sits at 0.0.0, which is what an unversioned build reports
and is meant to look wrong.
The formatting is a pure function now, so the rules have tests. They had
none while the version was the thing naming every image we ship.
ihasmail called itself "2.0" on the About page and "2.0.0" from
/api/health, both hardcoded, in four places that had drifted from each
other and from anything meaningful. A build now says what it is:
ihasmail v2.16.57
| | |
| | the pull request the commit came from
| the Stalwart generation this build targets -- 0.16
ihasmail's own major
The first two are the version in the root package.json, so there is a
single place to bump them, and 16 becomes 17 when ihasmail moves to
Stalwart 0.17. Dropping 0.15 is what makes that middle number honest:
while two generations were supported it could not have been either.
The pull request number comes from git at build time and is never
written back into the tree. It cannot be: it does not exist until the
pull request has merged, so a committed version would always describe a
merge that had not happened yet, and every open branch would collide on
the same line. A commit that did not come through a pull request carries
the last number plus its own short SHA -- 2.16.57+g1fa6578 -- which says
it is past that pull request rather than quietly claiming to be it.
.dockerignore excludes .git on purpose, so an image build cannot work
any of this out. It takes --build-arg IHASMAIL_VERSION instead, which
the build stage bakes into the bundle and the runtime stage keeps as an
environment variable for the server. Left out, it falls back to the base
version from package.json rather than failing -- so a version with no PR
number on it means whoever built the image did not pass one.
scripts/ is copied into the runtime image because the server resolves
its version through it. There is no git in there to ask, which is the
fallback's whole purpose.
Verified: 2.16.57 in the bundle and from /api/health on a dev checkout;
the same after a real docker build --build-arg, from inside the
container; and 2.16.0 rather than a crash when the arg is left off.
Note for deploying: ihasmail-deploy.sh on the host builds without the
argument and will produce 2.16.0 until it passes
--build-arg IHASMAIL_VERSION="$(node scripts/version.mjs)".