Both describeRule functions assembled their output by concatenation, which no
catalogue could fix. A translator handed " and " or " on " in isolation cannot
move it: German puts the verb last, Japanese does not separate list items with
a word at all, and the fragments arrive in an order the English sentence chose.
Reported by a native speaker reviewing the German catalogue (#247), whose "the
summaries" item is the Sieve one.
Every branch is now one whole sentence with placeholders, so a translator
rewrites the sentence including its word order. Joining is Intl.ListFormat,
which gives "A, B und C" for an allof rule and the language's own disjunction
for anyof, rather than a hardcoded " and " that would be wrong twice over.
The recurrence tail no longer appends: ", 5 times" and ", until 2026-05-03"
wrap the sentence they qualify, so a language that puts the limit first can.
Ordinals become words. The old suffix table -- st, nd, rd, th, picked by
arithmetic -- is English spelling rules in code, and no catalogue can reach a
suffix chosen that way. German writes "1.", Japanese "第1". nthOfPeriod is 1-5
or -1 in practice, so five words and "last" cover it.
WEEKDAYS is gone. Its long names could have been catalogue entries but its
short ones never could: "T" is Tuesday and Thursday, "S" is Saturday and
Sunday, and a catalogue cannot hold two translations under one key. That was
bad data rather than missing translation, and Intl has every name in every
locale in three widths. lib/datetime.ts gains weekdayName, weekdayNames and
formatList; recurrence.ts keeps WEEKDAY_KEYS for the ordering, which is not a
language question.
Adds the first tests either function has had. Neither had any, and no test
would have caught what was wrong with them, since the English output was
correct -- so these pin the two properties that actually matter: fragments go
through the catalogue, and the joining is Intl's.
32 strings and 9 plural forms are new and land with each language.
Verified: typecheck clean, 1009 tests pass.
The transport fix stops the truncation that caused #76, but the save path
had no answer for a baseline that arrives incomplete. It is neither
unknown nor empty, so every existing guard passes it through: it parses
into a shorter rule list that looks exactly like a script with fewer
rules, and saving writes that back over the real one.
Check the script against the shape the generator emits instead. Every
rule comment parses, every enabled rule has an if and a closed body under
it, every block ends with a blank line. Structural rather than a
re-serialize-and-compare, so a script written by an older version whose
serializer differed is still editable.
The rule editor reports a short script as unreadable rather than showing
the rules that happened to parse, since a list that looks complete over a
script that is not is the most dangerous thing it could offer.
A cut at the end of a complete rule block is still a valid shorter script
and cannot be told apart from one; that residual is the proxy's to cover.
Twenty-five rules and two buttons that move one place at a time meant a
rule pushed to the wrong end cost ten clicks to bring back. It can now
be dragged.
A grip on the left of each card arms the drag, so the switch, the name
and the buttons still take a plain click, and the up and down buttons
stay for the keyboard. The card being dragged fades; the one under the
pointer draws a line on the edge the rule would land on, top half or
bottom.
The guard against dropping a rule onto itself reads a ref rather than
state: dragstart and the first dragover can arrive in the same frame,
and a stale read there drew a drop line on the card being dragged. Found
by driving the real thing in a browser, and covered by a test that fires
the two events back to back.
Renaming or editing a Sieve rule moved it to the bottom of the list, and
in Sieve the order is the order the rules run in, so mail started being
filed by a different rule than before. Putting it back took a click per
place moved.
Two things did it. saveAndApply always appended the rule it was given —
right for a rule created from a message, wrong for one being edited. And
the "Also apply to existing messages" tick defaulted to on wherever it
was offered, so every edit in Settings went down that path, including a
plain rename.
The rule now keeps its seat: a shared upsertRule replaces by id in place
and only appends what is genuinely new. The tick defaults to on only in
"Filter messages like this…", where applying it is the point, and the
toast no longer calls an edited rule "created".
Fixes#24
jcoffey-dev