GitHub went dark with the account suspension on 2026-09-20 and GitLab was
retired on 2026-09-22, so links to either no longer resolve. Repository,
file, release and download links now point at git.coffeylabs.org, images
at registry.coffeylabs.org, and old GitHub issue and pull request links at
coffey-labs/ihasmail-github-archive, whose numbers match GitHub's.
The share address takes a plain form POST, which any website can make,
and the app opened whatever arrived straight into a composer. It now
shows what was shared -- the title, the start of the text and link, and
the file names -- and opens a message only when the reader chooses to.
Discarding drops it.
Confirm dialogs now put a message that is not plain text in a div, since
the summary has blocks of its own.
Three new strings, translated in all nine catalogs.
The guard shipped with "Discard changes" as the only choice carrying a
colour -- a filled red button, against a plain outlined "Save changes" --
which made losing the work the loudest thing in a dialog whose entire
purpose is to stop that. The emphasis belongs on the safe answer.
A dialog choice can now be marked `primary`, and Save is. Discard keeps its
`danger` flag, but a danger choice is drawn the way `.menu-item.danger`
already is: a red label on the ordinary surface. In a list of answers a
filled red button is not "this one is destructive", it is "this one is the
default", which is the opposite of what it meant here.
That rendering change reaches the other choice dialog too -- the calendar's
"this occurrence or the whole series", where both answers are marked danger
because both delete something. Two filled red buttons become two red labels
and nothing is highlighted, which is right: neither answer there is the safe
one, so neither should look like it.
Checked in the browser against the mock, in both themes. Light: #dc2626 on
white, 4.8:1. Dark: the theme's own --danger, which every palette already
tunes for contrast on this surface.
Reported on #175 by the reporter's colleague, who is right that the
non-destructive action is the one that normally gets the highlight.
Wrapping ~1,000 strings by hand is a thousand chances to mistype the copy
itself, and a parser does not get bored. scripts/i18n-extract.mjs does the
mechanical part -- JSX text and the attributes a person actually reads -- and
refuses the rest rather than guessing. 78% now: 515 wrapped, 143 left.
What it refuses matters as much as what it does. Text split around an
interpolation arrives as separate fragments, and wrapping each on its own
produces "Move " and " messages", which no translator can do anything with;
those are listed for a person to rebuild as sentences. So is anything
containing a double quote, which would end the literal.
Three things it had to be taught, each found by running it:
- <code>, <kbd> and <pre> are not prose. The first run wrapped `label:name`
inside <code> -- a search operator, where translating it breaks the thing it
documents. Subtrees marked translate="no" are skipped for the same reason.
- `t` is a natural name for a callback parameter and several files already use
it, so an import called `t` is shadowed inside those callbacks -- silently,
wherever the local happens to be callable. The name is checked per file now
and aliased to `translate` where it is taken.
- JSX decodes HTML entities and a JS string literal does not, so
`Language & region` moved into t("...") and rendered the entity on screen.
That last one is the one worth remembering. Typecheck passed, 443 tests
passed, and the page said "Language & region" in plain sight. It took
looking at a screenshot, and then a sweep of ten views to find the second
occurrence in a sentence I had written by hand earlier the same day. Nothing
in the toolchain was ever going to catch it: it is valid TypeScript rendering
valid text that happens to be wrong.
The codemod decodes entities now, and checks for a quote after decoding rather
than before.
Closes#132.
Stalwart 0.16.20 accepts a synthetic id on `CalendarEvent/set`, writing a
`recurrenceOverrides` entry rather than touching the series, so editing
one date of a recurring event is now something the server does and this
does too.
Editing asks the scope *before* the form opens, because it decides which
event the form is even about: a form populated from the master shows the
series' start date, so editing Wednesday's standup would have offered to
move Monday's. Deleting asks in place of the old confirm.
The patch is narrowed rather than posted hopefully. 0.16.20 sorts
per-occurrence properties into three groups and only one is honest: ten
are refused with `invalidProperties`, twelve more are dropped from the
patch while the response still reports success, and the rest are applied.
That silent middle group is how #26 reached a live server - a successful
response is not evidence anything was written - so `occurrencePatch`
throws on the first group, reports the second to the caller, and the
editor leaves out the five it always sends. A patch that would be
entirely dropped is not sent at all.
The refusal for an occurrence of a this-and-future change offers the
series instead of a bare error toast. Nothing here writes one of those,
but an event synced from another client can carry one.
Two things the scope prompt cost, both worth knowing. A dialog is queued
in a store the moment it is asked for, so it outlives the effect that
asked: without a ref guard a remount queues a second prompt the first
answer cannot retract. And gating the *answer* on the effect's cleanup
flag is worse - StrictMode runs mount, cleanup, mount, so the flag is
already set by the time anyone clicks and the editor never opens.
The mock expands recurrences for the first time, which is what makes any
of this developable. It hands out synthetic ids for everything including
one-offs, gives occurrences a `recurrenceId` and no rule, and reproduces
the refusals - including the silent drops, since a mock that applied them
would let a client that sends them look correct everywhere but a real
server.
**About said "not detected".** Generation was only worked out from the reply to
a registry method, which we never send to a server that does not advertise
urn:stalwart:jmap — every 0.16 build does, and nothing older knows the
capability at all, so its absence is already the answer. Say so, instead of
shrugging. A session with no capabilities at all stays unknown, which is a
different thing from old.
**The caret jumped out of the OTP field after one digit.** Dialog's autofocus
effect listed onClose in its dependencies, and every caller passes an inline
arrow, so each keystroke in a dialog holding state tore the effect down, set it
up again, and refocused the first field — which in the disable-2FA dialog is
the password. Keep the handler in a ref so the effect depends only on `open`.
This was a bug in the shared dialog rather than in one screen; every dialog
with more than one field had it.
The test for it fails against the old dependency array, not just passes
against the new one.
jcoffey-dev