Commit Graph
29 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jcoffey-dev 2464c9655f Let the theme be forced onto mail that styles itself
Appearance gained "Apply the theme to messages too" some time ago, and it
themes an HTML message only when the message brings no colours of its own.
That predicate is the right default and it almost never passes: one
`color:#FFFFFF` on one button label opts a whole message out, so in real
mail — receipts, shipping notices, anything from a template — the switch
did nothing at all and the reader kept a bright white card on a dark UI.

A second switch, off by default and only meaningful with the first on,
forces the palette over the sender's colours. It cannot be done perfectly,
which is why it is a separate, explicit choice: the same bargain a
dark-reader extension makes.

What it does is tell two kinds of colour apart. A *sheet* the design sits
on — the white 600px wrapper — is neutralised, and a *painted surface* —
a call to action, a footer banner — is kept whole so its label stays
legible on it. Relative luminance decides, at 0.5: white wrappers sit at
1.0, a blue button near 0.09. Only the painted ones are marked, with
data-ihm-keep, and one rule in EMAIL_BASE_CSS neutralises everything else.

Nothing the sender wrote is removed, so the switch is reversible, colours
arriving from a <style> block are covered as well as inline ones, and
print still pins the tokens to ink on white.

The mock grew the message this is about: an outer wrapper on
bgcolor="#ffffff", a <style> block, a coloured button, a grey footer.
Without one, neither the bug nor the fix could be seen.

Verified in a browser against the mock: with only the first switch on the
card is still white; with both, the wrapper computes to transparent, body
text follows the theme, and the button keeps white-on-blue. Two surfaces
marked, which are the two the message paints.

Closes #290
2026-09-06 15:58:25 -07:00
jcoffey-dev c84f190f76 Check S/MIME signatures, and remember who signed
A signed message now says whether that holds up, as it is read. This is
verification only: nothing here signs, encrypts or decrypts, and the
private-key question that blocks those is untouched. Verifying needed
none of it, because the certificate travels inside the message -- which
is why this is the half that could be built.

What it checks. For multipart/signed carrying PKCS#7, the exact bytes of
the signed part -- headers included, canonicalised to CRLF -- are hashed
against the messageDigest attribute, and the signature over the signed
attributes is verified with WebCrypto against the certificate inside the
message. RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 and ECDSA over P-256/384/521, with SHA-256, 384
or 512.

The trust model is the design, and it is deliberately small. A browser
has no system trust store, and the certificate arrives inside the
message, so anyone can self-sign as anyone: on its own a good signature
shows only that the sender held the key they attached. So the word
"verified" is never rendered, and the reassuring case is not the loud
one. What carries the weight is remembering -- the first signed message
from an address pins its fingerprint, later ones are compared, and a
signer that changed is reported with both names and told to check by
another route. Trust on first use, no certificate authority anywhere.

The pins live in the account's settings rather than the browser: one
that only a single device knew would greet the same correspondent as new
everywhere else, which is how people are trained to click past the one
warning that matters. A pin records the message that created it, so the
message that established a signer keeps saying so instead of appearing
to be corroborated by itself -- without that, the very first signed
message anybody receives reads as "the same signer as before", where
before is itself. A changed, mismatched or expired signer is never
pinned, since writing the anomaly into the baseline makes every later
message agree with it.

Three things are declined rather than attempted, and all three say
"could not check" rather than "does not check out", because ignorance
and an accusation are different claims:

  - OpenPGP, by name. The signature carries no key and there is nowhere
    to get the sender's: x:PublicKey is the account's OWN registry, and
    a keyserver or WKD lookup would tell a third party who you
    correspond with -- the leak the image proxy exists to close.
  - SHA-1. Not forgeable in practice today, still not something to put a
    tick beside.
  - RSA-PSS, whose salt length lives in parameters this does not read.
    Guessing wrong would report a good signature as bad.

Nothing validates a chain: no CA bundle is shipped and revocation is not
checked. "Issued by" reports what the certificate claims, and a
self-signed one claims itself.

The DER, CMS, X.509 and MIME readers are hand-written and deliberately
narrow -- no new dependency, and the whole verifier is a lazily imported
8.6 kB chunk that a reader of unsigned mail never downloads. The one
place this is easy to get quietly wrong has its own function and its own
test: signed attributes are signed as a SET OF, not as the [0] IMPLICIT
they arrive as, and hashing the message instead would make every
signature "pass".

Tested against real `openssl smime -sign` output rather than hand-built
fixtures -- RSA, ECDSA, a tampered copy, and a valid signature by a
certificate for somebody else -- because a signed message written by
hand only agrees with whatever its author believed the format to be.
Also driven in a browser against the mock, which now serves three real
signed messages so every branch of the banner is reachable.

Translations: 34 new strings in all nine catalogues, 306 entries.
Falling back to English is unchanged at 24 per language.
2026-09-05 01:42:51 -07:00
jcoffey-dev be088ed78d Third pass: the strings libraries build and views render raw
A sweep of lib/ and store/ for user-facing English, after the views were done.
The pattern here is the one #248 found: a module returns an English sentence
and the view renders it without asking for a translation.

Scheduled send was entirely untranslated. The four presets -- Later today,
Tomorrow morning, Tomorrow afternoon, Monday morning -- were rendered raw, and
scheduleError() returned three English sentences straight to the picker.
describeSpan() built "30 days" by appending an "s" unless the count was one,
which is English grammar written into the code: it produces the right German
only by the two languages happening to agree, and Russian needs three forms.
It is plural() now. scheduleError translates in place rather than returning a
key, because it composes a sentence around that span.

Read receipts: refusalText() returns five explanations, all rendered raw in
MessageView, and the offered case was a template literal -- "Requested, to
x@y. Never sent automatically." -- with the address concatenated in. It takes
a placeholder now, so the sentence can be reordered.

Compose: the sending toast and its Undo, the Open draft action, the two
attachment failures, and three thrown errors that surface to the reader as
toasts.

Two swipe labels, Add star and Remove star, are rendered through
t(desc.label) and have never been in any catalogue -- the coverage scan that
found the other 176 only looked at t("literal") sites, so labels reaching t()
through a variable were invisible to it. Every such table is now enumerated
and all 61 values checked: these two were the only ones missing.

17 strings and 3 plural forms are new and land with each language.

Verified: typecheck clean, 1000 tests pass.
2026-09-03 13:52:24 -07:00
jcoffey-dev b10ce2f9dd Make "Show original" in the headers dialog the action, not a description
The hint at the foot of Message headers named an action and left you to go
find it. Requested in #236, and the reporter is right that it is the shape of
the thing rather than the size: telling somebody a feature exists is half a
job when the other half is one element away.

Clicking it now closes the headers dialog and opens the original, so it reads
as going deeper rather than as opening a second window.

`tNode` rather than a sentence chopped either side of a button: the sentence
stays whole for whoever translates it, and a language that puts the verb
somewhere else can move the hole rather than being handed two fragments.

The link style needed unscoping to work, which turned out to be a bug of its
own. `.link-btn` was written for the composer's To and Cc labels and scoped to
`.composer-field label`, so the two callers outside it -- the trusted-domain
list in Privacy settings, and now this -- rendered as default button chrome in
the middle of a sentence. The rule is now unscoped and Privacy is fixed by the
same change.

Checked in a browser: the hint reads as a sentence with a dotted-underlined
link in it, clicking swaps one dialog for the other, and the raw message is
there.

Closes #236.
2026-09-02 13:17:10 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 9a474ef2c8 Open winmail.dat
Outlook sending in Rich Text packs every attachment into one TNEF blob.
Every other client shows a single unopenable winmail.dat, and the files
inside it are gone as far as the reader is concerned -- which is a
decoding problem rather than a mail one.

Written from the published format: a signature, a key, then a flat run of
attributes, each one a level byte, a 32-bit id carrying its own type, a
length, the data and a checksum. Attachments are delimited by
attAttachRenddata rather than named, which is why the parse is a small
state machine.

The MAPI property stream inside attAttachment is read for two properties:
the long filename and the MIME type. attAttachTitle carries an 8.3 name,
so a file that arrived as "Quarterly Report Final.docx" is QUARTE~1.DOC
there and correct here. The stream stops at a named property (id >=
0x8000) rather than guessing past it, since those carry a GUID before
their value and nothing after one can be trusted to stay aligned.

Decoded in the browser, on request. The server never sees the contents and
has nowhere to keep a decoded copy; doing the work on sight would spend
the bandwidth whether or not anybody wanted what is inside.

A blob that goes wrong part-way through keeps what was read before that
point, whether it ran out or the checksum stopped matching. Half the
attachments beats none: the alternative is a reader who can see the file
is there and cannot have it. The original stays attached either way.

The message body is deliberately not decoded. TNEF can also carry it as
compressed RTF, which is a second format again for a body the reader
already has in plain text or HTML nine times in ten.

The mock now sends one, built by its own encoder rather than by the
parser's fixtures, so the two are independent implementations of the same
description.
2026-09-01 23:16:22 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 5b18f1d5d7 Warn about outside senders, large sends and links that mislead
Four warnings, in Privacy & safety, and all of them start switched off.

That is not timidity. A client that begins by interrupting is one people
learn to click through, and a warning clicked through without reading
costs the same attention and buys nothing. The outside-sender warning
could not be on by default in any case: it measures against the domains
that count as yours, and with nothing configured every message in the
mailbox is from outside.

Your own identity domains are always internal and are not configuration.
An account signed in as [email protected] warning that example.com is
external would be absurd, and making it be typed in first is a foot-gun
that leaves the feature useless the moment it is enabled. Configured
domains are additional, and cover their subdomains -- matched on a dot
boundary, so example.com covers mail.example.com and not notexample.com,
which is exactly the domain somebody registers on purpose.

The four:

A banner names the sender's domain on a message from outside.

Sending outside names the outside recipients and asks, rather than
refusing. "This is going outside" is a rule and not something the sender
can check; a list of addresses is. It reads the full identity list rather
than the visible one, since hiding an identity from the From menu does not
make its domain somebody else's.

Sending to a large group asks once the count crosses a threshold, which is
what catches a reply-all onto a long thread. It counts people rather than
headers, so one address in To and nine in Cc is a message to ten.

Opening a link asks when the destination is not trusted, and always when
the link's text names one domain while its destination is another -- even
where that destination is trusted, because being trusted is not the same
as being the place the text claimed. On that mismatch the offer to trust
the domain is withheld: what would be trusted is the destination, and the
destination is not the thing in question. Anything that is not http or
https is left alone, since warning about a mailto: is noise and noise is
how a warning stops being read. Both bodies are covered, because a link in
a plain-text mail is linkified by us and points wherever it likes just as
readily as one the sender marked up.

The click is cancelled and the navigation re-issued after the answer,
since there is no way to hold a real navigation open across a dialog. The
reopen runs in the continuation of the dialog's own click, which is still
the gesture a popup blocker wants to see.
2026-09-01 22:45:22 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 790213cc17 Merge branch 'main' into feat/forward-as-eml
# Conflicts:
#	web/src/store/compose.ts
#	web/src/views/mail/MessageView.tsx
2026-09-01 22:31:42 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 0db795371e Forward a message as an attachment
Forwarding quoted the original into a new message, which is the right
thing for passing on something to be read and the wrong thing for passing
on something to be looked at. Quoting rewrites the body, drops the
headers, and re-parents the attachments, so a bounce, a phishing report or
anything else where the message itself is the evidence arrived altered.

Forward as attachment sends the message whole, as a message/rfc822 part.
It costs no upload at all: a message's own blobId is its RFC822 blob and
already lives in the account, so this goes through the same by-reference
path as attach-from-Files and a 40 MB message attaches as fast as a small
one.

It is in the message's own menu, the list's right-click menu, and the
overflow on the reply strip at the foot of a thread, which is the one a
thumb finds on a phone.

Two things fixed on the way, both exposed rather than introduced by this.

The filename rule was subject.replace(/[^\w.-]+/g, "_"), and \w without
the u flag is ASCII: every character of a Russian, Japanese or Chinese
subject failed the class, so those messages downloaded as a row of
underscores. What is actually unsafe in a filename is much shorter than
"not ASCII" -- path separators, the names Windows reserves, the control
range -- so the rule now keeps letters from any script and drops only
those. It lives in one place and the .eml download uses it too.

And the composer's attachment chip set overflow/text-overflow on a span,
where neither does anything, so the name never truncated and the size ran
on after it on the same line. Only long names showed it, which is every
.eml named from a subject.
2026-09-01 21:57:11 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 63c2839602 Show what the spam filter said, in the message details
The filter in front of the mailbox scores every delivered message and
writes its working into headers, and none of it was being read. A message
in Junk gave no reason for being there.

Nothing here scores anything. The headers are parsed and shown, so this
cannot disagree with the filter that actually made the decision.

Two formats cover what sits in front of a Stalwart mailbox in practice:
the SpamAssassin-shaped X-Spam-* set, which Stalwart's own filter writes,
and Rspamd's X-Spamd-Result. A header in neither shape is left unread
rather than guessed at, since a misparsed score shown confidently is worse
than no panel at all. Mail that arrived without any of them shows nothing.

Rules are listed largest mover first and signed, because which way a rule
pushed is the point, and the biggest contributor is the answer to why the
message scored what it did.

Two things it deliberately will not do. A score is always given the
threshold it was measured against, because 6.7 is damning against 5 and
unremarkable against 15 -- the number alone is not something a reader can
act on; where no threshold was stated, it says so rather than implying
one. And where the filter recorded no verdict, none is derived from score
against threshold: the filter applies policy we cannot see, and putting a
verdict in its mouth would be inventing one.

The mock writes the same headers at delivery -- spam in Junk, clean in the
Inbox, nothing on mail this account wrote -- so the panel can be developed
and demoed against it.
2026-09-01 21:45:22 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 984f0474e3 Look at a file without downloading it first
Files could only hand you the bytes: double-clicking a picture put it on
disk and left you to find it. The viewer for this already existed --
images, PDFs and text, in the attachment preview in MessageView -- it was
just wired to one screen. It is now a component both screens use.

Two things it needed before it was any use on Files. The type detection
falls back to the file name: an upload carries whatever the browser
guessed, which for anything unusual is application/octet-stream, so the
old exact-type check saw nothing to show in a .md that had just been
uploaded. And text is read with fetch, which ignores Content-Disposition,
so Markdown previews even though the server will not serve it inline.

Whether we can show a file and whether the server will serve it inline
are separate questions, and lib/preview.ts answers them separately:
`openableInTab` mirrors the isInlineSafe allowlist in the blob route,
because navigating to a blob the server will not inline just starts a
download. SVG is left out of both -- it carries script, and how to show
one safely is its own question, not a detail of a file lister.

Printing goes with it. A picture or a text file prints from the dialog
with everything else dropped; a PDF prints itself from its own iframe,
since the page around it cannot paginate someone else's document. Hiding
`.app` alone was not enough there -- `#root` kept its height and printed a
blank first page, the same trap as the message card.
2026-09-01 20:18:51 -07:00
jcoffey-dev a33260966c Print the message you asked to print
The Print in a message's own menu called window.print() bare, so it
printed the whole conversation -- every message on the page -- which is
what the toolbar's "Print conversation" is already for. Opening one
message's menu and asking to print it is not a request for the other
eleven.

It now marks the card it was opened from and the print stylesheet drops
the siblings for the duration. The subject heading stays: a printed
message with no subject on it is a page nobody can file. The "3 messages"
count beside it goes, since only one of them is on the paper.

The label is left as "Print" rather than made more specific -- it is
translated in all nine shipped catalogues, and the toolbar entry beside
it already says "conversation".
2026-09-01 19:46:44 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 02c0332d8f Send a message again as a new one
A mail the far end rejected, or one that went to an address with a typo in
it, is a mail you want to send again -- not forward, and not reply to.
Doing it by hand meant a new message and copying five fields across.

"Compose as new" sits with Reply and Forward, in the message menu and in
the list's right-click menu. It opens a composer holding the recipients
the message had, its Reply-To, its subject with nothing prefixed to it,
its body with nothing wrapped around it, and its attachments.

What makes it a new mail is what it leaves behind. `draftId` stays null,
or sending would destroy the message it was made from. `inReplyTo`,
`references`, `relatedEmailId` and `relatedKeyword` stay null, so it hangs
off no thread and sending it marks the original neither answered nor
forwarded. The Message-ID is the server's and the date is stamped at
build time, so both are new without anything asking for them -- the send
path needed no changes at all.

A message you sent is composed as the identity you sent it as. One
somebody else sent has no identity of yours to match, and guessing from
whom it was addressed to would put the resend behind an alias that was
only ever the receiving end, so that case takes the account's default.

No signature is added. The body is the one that was sent, which already
ends in whatever signature went with it, and appending the identity's
would give it two.

Closes #176
2026-09-01 08:58:15 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 7ba749148f Make an event out of a message
Asked for in #167: a right-click on a mail that turns it into a calendar
entry, the way a bill or a task becomes a reminder. Nothing clever, and
deliberately so -- the subject becomes the title, the body becomes the
description, and the reader supplies the one thing the message cannot.

A due date is exactly that thing. "Due on the 14th" in an invoice is not
a date a parser could be trusted with, and a wrong guess quietly
scheduled is worse than no guess at all, so the editor opens on the next
half hour for an hour and the reader fixes it. Forward rather than now,
because a start time that has already passed by the time they press
Create is one more thing to correct.

The body is capped at 5000 characters. A newsletter is a message too,
and its whole body would be stored on the event, synced to every device,
and shown in a three-row textarea; what is worth keeping -- the amount,
the account, the address -- is near the top. The cut is marked, so a
truncated bill is not read as the whole of it.

One message only. The list menu acts on the selection everywhere else,
but there is no sensible event to make out of five mails, and the mobile
entry appears only when exactly one row is held.

The editor lives inside CalendarView and the reader is in the mail view
when they ask, so the draft waits in the calendar store until that view
mounts and takes it -- once, or it would reopen on every later visit.
It seeds a form rather than an event: the dialog still says New event
and still has to be pressed.

Called *Create event…* rather than "appointment", which is the word the
issue used: it opens the New event dialog, and each catalogue already
has its own settled noun for that -- Termin, événement, 日程.

Reachable three ways, since a phone has no right-click: the row context
menu, a message's ⋮, and the ⋮ of a held row on mobile. Hidden entirely
where the account has no calendar.
2026-08-31 22:52:59 -07:00
jcoffey-dev ba4d2105a4 Merge main: the list subject stays notranslate and gains its translated fallback
Both sides of the conflict belong. The span holds a subject, which is the
sender's words and not ours to machine-translate; the text shown when
there is no subject is ours, and should follow the interface language.
2026-08-31 14:44:30 -07:00
jcoffey-dev a6863e98cc Second extraction pass: the strings the codemod could not see
`i18n:coverage` reported 100% while a hundred-odd strings rendered
English in every language. It was not wrong about what it measured: it
reads JSX text, and none of these were JSX text. They were toast
arguments, `confirmDialog({ title, confirmLabel })` props, `title=` and
`aria-label=` attributes, and template literals — every one built from an
expression the codemod cannot read.

176 source strings and 15 plural sets now go through t() and plural(),
translated into all nine languages. Where English put a word in a slot,
the sentence is spelled out per branch instead: `Filter ${verb}` became
"Filter saved" and "Filter created", because which word agrees with what,
and where it sits, is not a property English gets to decide for everyone.
Counts that were `${n} message${n === 1 ? "" : "s"}` are plural() calls,
so Russian and Ukrainian get three forms and Japanese and Chinese get the
one they actually have.

Two of the catalogue's own conventions were worth learning the hard way.
Plural entries are keyed on the English *other* form, not `one` — `one`
is a form English happens to have and Japanese does not. And a constant
table holding English that is translated at the render site is fine: the
literal is a key, not a leak.

Which is what the new check encodes. `scripts/i18n-literals.mjs` accepts
a string that is wrapped where it is written or is a catalogue key
somewhere, and refuses one that is neither — a string no catalogue can
translate, however many languages ship. It found twenty more than my own
sweep had, including the stale-folder toast seen in production. It runs
as part of `npm run i18n:check`.

Also fixed: the catalogue is now awaited before the first paint. The
tree is rebuilt when a catalogue lands, so components recover on their
own, but a string computed in an effect does not — a toast fired in that
gap is emitted in English and stays English. The wait costs nothing
visible, since the session bootstrap already shows a spinner and English
resolves immediately.

And the Japanese agenda title loses a space Japanese does not use:
"{date} からの予定" was written with the English habit of spacing around
a placeholder.
2026-08-31 14:14:30 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 51dabd9cab Stop a language change undoing itself, and stop the translate prompt
Two reports, both about the language setting.

**Picking a language sometimes took several clicks.** The subtree that
reads the account's settings file is keyed on the language version, so
choosing a language deliberately throws it away and builds it again. The
remount re-read the settings file — which still held the old language,
because the write is debounced by three seconds — and applied it, putting
the old language back. The click that appeared to work was the one made
after the previous write had landed, which is exactly the "sometimes"
in the report.

Worse than it looked: the queued push survived the remount, so the file
was eventually written with the new language while the screen showed the
old one. A reload then changed the language on its own.

Fixed twice over, because either alone leaves a race. The file is read
once per account per page load rather than once per mount, and hydrate
now holds back any key with a change still queued — a change that has
not been written up is newer than the file by definition. That rule is
`mergeRemote`, pulled out as a pure function so it could be tested
without a JMAP client.

**Both browsers kept offering to translate an English page.** They were
right to: `<html lang>` said English while the visible text was 6,289
message rows of marketing copy and brand names in whatever language the
sender wrote in. The list is most of the text on the screen, so that is
what the detector was reading.

Sender, subject and preview in the list, and the thread subject and
sender name in the reader, are now marked as what they are — content,
not interface. Message bodies were already marked, so this is the same
line drawn in the places the earlier pass missed rather than a new one.
Whether it silences the prompt is Chrome's call and cannot be checked
from inside the page; the marking is right either way.
2026-08-31 13:45:18 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 87383440bb German, generated by AI and marked Beta until somebody signs it off
The first language, and the first one where the honest thing to say is not
flattering: no native speaker has read it. That is stated in the app rather
than in a commit nobody reads, because it is the fact a reader needs to judge
what they are looking at. Somebody told a translation is unchecked forgives an
odd sentence and reports it; somebody told it was reviewed reasonably concludes
the product is sloppy. The setting carries a link straight to a report, which
is the whole review process here.

`beta` is a property of the language, not of the catalogue's completeness. A
file can be word-for-word finished and still read like a machine wrote it, and
that is what the flag marks. Removing it is a person's decision.

Register is "Sie", consistently, and written down in the file so the next
language and the next contributor inherit the decision rather than re-take it.
Thunderbird and Outlook use it; ihasmail is as often a company's mail as
somebody's own, where "du" from software the workplace deployed reads as
presumptuous. Where a string can dodge the question it does, which is ordinary
good German UI. The glossary at the top of the file fixes the vocabulary once
-- Posteingang, Papierkorb, Entwürfe, archivieren -- because inconsistency
reads as amateur far more than an imperfect word choice does. "Label" and
"Spam" stay English, since translating them would name things no German mail
client calls that.

766 of 781 strings. The fifteen left are product names, bare URLs and example
addresses, which should stay English and now do.

Two things this turned up that the earlier work had hidden:

Labels defined as module-level constants -- the entire settings navigation,
the theme cards, the swipe choices, the date formats, the sharing permissions
-- are evaluated once, before any catalogue loads, so they could only ever be
English. Nothing failed; the German build simply had an English sidebar. They
are translated where they render now, which keeps the constant as data and
makes its English text the key.

And the codemod's narrowed rule, which let it take 73 more strings last time,
was too broad after all: text stranded after an inline <a> or <strong> came
through as sentence fragments -- ", and what a new account starts on." Eight
of them, rebuilt with tNode so the sentence stays whole and the element is a
named hole a translator can move.

scripts/i18n-catalog-check.mjs is new and earned itself immediately: it found
three keys invented that the code never asks for, which is the silent failure
in a catalogue -- a translation that looks right, is never looked up, and
renders English for ever. It also had to be taught about t(variable), because
it cried wolf 33 times over the constants above, and a check that cries wolf
gets switched off.

Verified in the browser rather than only in tests, which is where the settings
sidebar being English was visible and nowhere else.
2026-08-31 11:06:54 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 3f4b33cb51 Finish extraction: 100%, and a coverage number worth believing
The 143 the codemod refused turned out to be two different things, and only
one of them needed a person.

A third were phrases sitting next to an icon -- `<Plus /> New rule`. The
refusal rule was "has siblings", which is broader than the danger: what breaks
a translation is a sibling that renders *text*, splitting a sentence into
fragments no one can reorder. An element beside a phrase does not. Narrowing
the rule to text-producing siblings let the codemod take 73 more.

The rest were real sentences with values in the middle, rebuilt by hand as
named placeholders -- "Your active script “{name}” was written by hand",
"Waiting on the server — goes out {when}." Named rather than positional
because a translator moves the parts around; counted things go through
plural() so Russian and Ukrainian get their three forms rather than English's
two.

Sentences with an element inside them needed something new. `Open <code>mailto:
</code> links in ihasmail` has two obvious treatments and both are wrong:
splitting it into two t() calls hands over fragments that cannot be reordered,
and dropping the <code> keeps the sentence whole but loses the monospace that
said "this is a literal". tNode() keeps the sentence whole and makes the
element a named hole in it, so a translator sees one sentence and can put the
hole where their language wants it. The German test asserts exactly that: the
same call renders the code first when the catalogue says so.

The coverage number was also lying, and it is worth saying how. It counted
text inside <code> and inside translate="no" as untranslated work, and
placeholders like "123456" and "+1 555 0100" -- a one-time code and a phone
format. None of those will ever be translated, so the report sat at 21 with 6
real items left. A number with an unreachable floor is something to argue with
rather than act on, so the tool now applies the same rules the codemod does.

596 wrapped, nothing remaining. Verified in the browser across 15 views, which
is where the last bulk pass hid a bug the tests could not see: no entities, no
unfilled placeholders, no raw t( in rendered text, and the toggle switches that
looked like emptied labels are text-free by design.
2026-08-31 10:41:24 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 8ea611f7f7 Extract 515 strings by codemod, and the two bugs only a screenshot caught
Wrapping ~1,000 strings by hand is a thousand chances to mistype the copy
itself, and a parser does not get bored. scripts/i18n-extract.mjs does the
mechanical part -- JSX text and the attributes a person actually reads -- and
refuses the rest rather than guessing. 78% now: 515 wrapped, 143 left.

What it refuses matters as much as what it does. Text split around an
interpolation arrives as separate fragments, and wrapping each on its own
produces "Move " and " messages", which no translator can do anything with;
those are listed for a person to rebuild as sentences. So is anything
containing a double quote, which would end the literal.

Three things it had to be taught, each found by running it:

- <code>, <kbd> and <pre> are not prose. The first run wrapped `label:name`
  inside <code> -- a search operator, where translating it breaks the thing it
  documents. Subtrees marked translate="no" are skipped for the same reason.
- `t` is a natural name for a callback parameter and several files already use
  it, so an import called `t` is shadowed inside those callbacks -- silently,
  wherever the local happens to be callable. The name is checked per file now
  and aliased to `translate` where it is taken.
- JSX decodes HTML entities and a JS string literal does not, so
  `Language &amp; region` moved into t("...") and rendered the entity on screen.

That last one is the one worth remembering. Typecheck passed, 443 tests
passed, and the page said "Language &amp; region" in plain sight. It took
looking at a screenshot, and then a sweep of ten views to find the second
occurrence in a sentence I had written by hand earlier the same day. Nothing
in the toolchain was ever going to catch it: it is valid TypeScript rendering
valid text that happens to be wrong.

The codemod decodes entities now, and checks for a quote after decoding rather
than before.
2026-08-31 09:58:33 -07:00
jcoffey-dev be1d787b5f Defend against Chrome rewriting the DOM, and add the language setting
Groundwork for un-shelving translations. Chrome's translator rewrites the
rendered DOM directly, wrapping text nodes in <font> elements React has never
heard of, and the next update can then call removeChild against a parent whose
children have moved (facebook/react#11538). This is the structural defence
against that, plus the setting the served language will read from.

The language setting is `uiLanguage`, and it is deliberately not the `locale`
field that already exists. That one is a formatting choice -- what calendar,
clock and numerals to use -- and folding the two together would silently
rewrite everybody's date format the first time they picked a language. German
dates with an English interface is a real preference, and so is the reverse.
It defaults to English when absent, which covers both a new account and every
settings file written before this, and Accept-Language is not consulted: a
served locale should be something the reader chose rather than something
guessed and then written down as though they had. Only languages with strings
shipped are offered, which today means English alone -- a picker entry without
a catalogue behind it would leave the page claiming a language it is not in,
which stops a reader translating a page they cannot read.

`<html lang>` is set where applyTheme is set: at store module load, from the
localStorage cache, before createRoot() has rendered anything. Not in an
effect -- a lang that is briefly wrong is enough to raise the translate prompt
on a page that needed none. There is no server-rendered alternative to reach
for here: ihasmail serves a static shell and holds no account state, and the
settings file lives in the reader's own JMAP Files, so reading it before the
page existed would mean authenticating to Stalwart on every page load. The
static lang="en" in index.html covers the first bytes; the store only ever
corrects a reader who chose otherwise. Both halves are tested.

translate="no" and class="notranslate" go on the narrow boundaries only:
rendered email bodies, raw message source, attachment text, the generated and
hand-edited Sieve, the brand and the login name. Not on <body> -- someone
whose language ihasmail does not speak yet should still be able to translate
the parts that are ours. Email bodies turn out to live in a shadow root, so
React never reconciles them and they were never a crash risk; the marker there
is about not rewriting what a sender actually wrote.

Twenty-four fragile interpolation points were found with the TypeScript
parser rather than grep, and fifteen refactored. Pluralisation and
"count + label" pairs are collapsed into a single expression so the text is a
lone child React updates with textContent, rather than a text node with
conditional siblings to insert around. One of them -- InviteCard's
{method === "REPLY" && organizer ? "" : ""} -- rendered an empty string either
way and is simply gone.

The boundary is scoped to the main content, so the header, folder tree and any
open composer sit outside it and survive independently. It recovers by
remounting the subtree, which costs nothing because everything inside
re-derives from the stores, and it logs at info rather than error: a reader
translating a page is expected and recovered from, and filing it as an error
would put an entry in every console-reading reporter for behaviour that
worked. It re-raises anything that is not a DOM mutation error, so a real bug
still surfaces as one, and it gives up after three attempts rather than
looping invisibly.

Worth recording: the crash could not be reproduced on React 19.2.8. Wrapping
207-249 React-managed text nodes in <font>, exactly as the translator does,
then driving in-place conditional toggles and navigations, left the app intact
with the boundary never firing. The original issue is from React 16 and the
reconciler has changed a great deal since. So this lands as defence whose
premise is weaker than assumed rather than as a fix for something observed
here, and the boundary is insurance rather than a load-bearing part. The
notranslate markers and the collapsed interpolations stand on their own merits
either way.
2026-08-31 09:14:41 -07:00
jcoffey-dev c0fc0083ff Stop rebuilding the message body when it is marked read
Marking a thread read redrew the message pane: the mail vanished and came
back, white to dark to white on an HTML message that brings its own
colours, half a second after the reader started reading it. Worst with
auto-mark set to "immediately", where it happens the moment the thread
opens (#100).

The pane was not re-mounting. The *body* was being thrown away and built
again, and the reason is one dependency.

`HtmlBody` writes the message into a shadow root in an effect, and that
effect had the click handler in its dependency list. The handler is a
`useCallback` over `onShowImages`, which the parent passed as an arrow
created inline, so it was a new function on every render -- and therefore
the effect ran on every render, and every render replaced the rendered
message with an identical one. Marking as read is exactly such a render:
the store hands back a new email object and the thread re-renders.

The listener now lives in its own effect. It is attached to the shadow
root rather than to the contents, which survives the rewriting anyway, so
a handler that changes identity costs a listener swap and nothing else.
`onShowImages` is stable now too, but the split is the fix: it is what
makes the body immune to the next handler that changes.

This also stops the quoted-text toggle collapsing. `setQuoteOpen(false)`
lives in the same effect and had been resetting on every render, so
expanding a quote and waiting for the timer put it away again.

Measured rather than watched, since a flicker is exactly the thing an eye
will agree with you about. Holding a node from inside the shadow root
across the transition, on the same three-message thread with the delay at
0: before, 21 childList mutations on the root and the held node detached
and replaced; after, no mutations at all and the same node still
attached. Clicking a blocked image still reveals remote images, which is
what the moved listener is for.

Closes #100.
2026-08-27 12:17:49 -07:00
jcoffey-dev d4b39c06d6 Stop the reading view rearranging itself as you read
Opening a conversation with several unread messages showed them all
expanded, each with its unread bar. The moment the auto-mark-read timer
fired, every one of them collapsed except the last, and the bars
vanished -- so the messages you had just been given were taken away
again, and the only record of which ones they were went with them (#69).

Both came from the same place: expansion and the bar were derived from
`$seen`, live. Marking read on the server changed what the view thought
it was looking at.

Marking read is not the problem. Opening a thread is the signal that you
are reading it, and mbunkus was explicit that turning the setting off is
not the answer he wants. What was wrong was letting a change *this view
caused* alter its own shape underneath the reader.

The thread now remembers which messages were unread when it was opened,
and uses that for expansion and for the bar. The set only grows while a
thread is open -- a message arriving unread joins it -- and is discarded
on the way to another thread. The server still gets marked read on the
timer, exactly as before, and the message list still updates.

It is accumulated during render rather than in an effect. It is derived
purely from the messages already in hand and adding an id twice does
nothing, while an effect would repaint a frame later -- which is the
flicker this exists to remove.

Verified against the mock with markReadDelay at 0, the harshest setting,
where the timer fires immediately: six seconds after opening a
three-message thread, the server reports all three seen while the view
still shows all three expanded with their bars. Before, two of the three
would have collapsed in the first instant.
2026-08-26 15:28:51 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 3310149fcc Send the read receipt the sender asked for
JMAP has an extension for this -- RFC 9007's MDN/send -- and Stalwart does
not implement it, so ihasmail assembles the RFC 8098 multipart/report itself
and sends it the long way round: raw MIME uploaded as a blob, imported,
submitted. That is also why the receipt lands in Sent, which is where it
honestly belongs.

The plumbing is the easy half. A receipt tells whoever asked that the address
is live and when the message was read, to an address the sender chose, so the
refusals are the feature: nothing marked Auto-Submitted (RFC 3834, or two
servers answer each other forever), nothing carrying Precedence bulk/list/junk
or a List-Id, nothing already acknowledged, nothing that never arrived. A
receipt aimed anywhere other than the sender is offered, but says so first.
There is no "always send" setting, only ask or never.

Sending is recorded with RFC 3503's $mdnsent keyword on the original rather
than remembered locally, so a second look -- or another client entirely --
knows not to ask again. Non-ASCII parts go base64 rather than 8bit, so
nothing rests on 8BITMIME surviving every hop.

Verified against the mock end to end: the blob uploads, the receipt imports
and submits, and the original reads back marked. Not yet exercised against
the live server.
2026-08-24 22:53:06 -07:00
jcoffey-dev e720623895 Hold a message in the server's queue until the time you asked for
Scheduled send, which the README listed as needing server support that
Stalwart has had all along. The delay cannot be asked for directly --
RFC 8621 makes `sendAt` read-only and server-derived -- so it goes on the
envelope as an RFC 4865 `HOLDUNTIL` parameter, and the server reports back
the time it settled on.

Stalwart advertises this in the *account* capability, not the session-level
one (which is empty): `maxDelayedSend` of thirty days and `FUTURERELEASE`
among its `submissionExtensions`. The composer offers scheduling only when
both are there, and never offers a time the server would refuse.

A held message goes to a Scheduled folder rather than Sent, because
`onSuccessUpdateEmail` would otherwise file it as sent the moment the
submission is created, and it has not been sent. Nothing moves it out when
the hold expires, so the folder is reconciled on the way in: released
messages to Sent, cancelled ones back to Drafts. Cancelling uses a separate
`Email/set` rather than `onSuccessUpdateEmail`, whose key Stalwart reads as
an Email id and not, as the RFC says, a submission id.

The mock grows the whole lifecycle, and learns to resolve creation
references while it is there -- it had been quietly declining to create any
submission at all, since sending names its message as `#m`. Because
Stalwart's own `futureRelease` setting defaults to off and then drops the
hold in silence, `npm run dev:mock:no-future-release` reproduces that.

Verified end to end against the mock; not yet against the live server.
2026-08-24 22:07:29 -07:00
jcoffey-dev d143e711d4 Add contacts by right-clicking anyone named in a message
Right-clicking a sender, or any address in the message details, opens a menu
offering to add that person to the address book - plus edit them when they are
already known, write to them, or copy the address.

"Add to contacts" opens the contact editor prefilled rather than saving
silently, so the address book gets a real card that the user can complete,
not a bare email address. contactFromAddress splits the display name into
JSContact name components: "Ada Lovelace" into given and surname, "Lovelace,
Ada" unpicked, a single word as the given name, and a name that is really
just an address left off entirely.

Addresses in the details block were joined into one string, so they are now
rendered per address to be individually targetable.

ContactEditor previously ignored a prefilled name on an unsaved card - it read
name components only when the card had an id - so it now reads them either
way.
2026-08-23 14:46:38 -07:00
LINUXexpert.org 55af4eab8f Merge pull request #7 from LINUXexpert-org/message-theme-option
Let messages follow the app theme, at the user's choice
2026-08-23 13:36:38 -07:00
jcoffey-dev c3cecf9916 Let messages follow the app theme, at the user's choice
Messages render on a white card in every theme. That is deliberate for mail
that styles itself, but #4 points out the case it gets wrong: a message with
no styling of its own has nothing worth preserving, and flashing white at
someone reading in the dark is a real cost.

Appearance gains a switch under the theme cards, off by default so the
current behaviour is unchanged. With it on, HTML mail that declares no
colours follows the app theme; mail that sets a background or text colour
still gets the light card it was designed for, because half-darkening someone
else's design is worse than leaving it alone. Plain-text mail already
followed the theme and is untouched by the switch.

The themed palette is expressed in the app's own custom properties, which
cross the shadow boundary, so switching theme repaints open messages without
re-rendering them, and the accent-coloured link stays consistent. The host
element takes color-scheme: inherit so form controls and scrollbars inside a
message match too.

htmlDeclaresColors covers bgcolor attributes, <font color>, and colour or
background declarations in style attributes and <style> blocks, while
ignoring near-misses like border-color and ?color= in a URL.

Closes #4
2026-08-23 13:34:24 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 2c23ea980b Offer ihasmail as the browser's mailto: handler
Settings > General gains a "Default mail app" section that calls
registerProtocolHandler so mail links anywhere in the browser open ihasmail.
The browser owns the decision and there is no API to read it back, so the UI
says what it can: it records that we asked, offers "Ask again", shows a
Remove button where unregisterProtocolHandler exists, and points at the
browser's own settings. Unsupported browsers (Safari) and insecure contexts
get an explanation instead of a dead button.

The manifest now declares protocol_handlers for mailto, which is the route by
which an *installed* app can be offered by the operating system itself; the
UI says so and links the two ideas rather than promising a system-wide
default the page cannot grant.

Mailto parsing is now one function (parseMailto in lib/address.ts) instead of
three hand-rolled copies in AppShell and MessageView. It follows RFC 6068:
recipients from the path, the to= header or both, case-insensitive headers,
"+" as space, and tolerant of malformed escapes. That fixes Cc and Bcc being
silently dropped, and draftFromMailto escapes the body so a mailto: URL from
an untrusted page reaches the composer as text rather than markup.
2026-08-23 13:21:50 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 645b8b510f ihasmail 2.0: rebuild as Stalwart-first JMAP webmail
Replace the FastAPI/HTMX prototype with a Node/Hono session proxy and a
React 19/Vite SPA. Mail (conversation view, search operators, labels,
sanitised HTML, privacy image proxy, invites, undo send, templates),
calendar (month/week/day/agenda, invites, free/busy, categories,
context menus), contacts (JSContact, groups, vCard), files, Sieve filter
builder (incl. filter-from-message with retroactive apply), vacation,
identities with default + Reply-To, PWA/mobile layout, push via SSE,
in-memory mock Stalwart for dev, Docker + CI.
2026-08-23 01:07:13 -07:00