Follow what the live server does with tenants and domains

A run on the production server with throwaway tenants, a role, lists and a
domain, all removed, found three things the source reading had not:

- Something in a tenant has to be on a domain in that tenant (a list in a
  tenant on an unassigned domain is invalidForeignKey), while something in
  no tenant may be on a tenant's domain. The account panel's tenant choice
  offered every tenant; it offers only the domain's now, and a new account
  starts in the tenant of the domain it is made on. The domain list reads
  memberTenantId for it.
- A domain created in a tenant puts its DKIM keys there too, and they keep
  the tenant from being deleted. They are counted with the rest, so Delete
  is not offered while any remain.
- Stalwart lets a domain leave a tenant while the tenant still has accounts
  on it, stranding them. The panel asks first and refuses while any are
  there.

The refusal to delete a tenant that holds anything was confirmed, as were
tenant create, quota pointers, logo and rename. The mock follows the domain
rule, filters DKIM keys by tenant, and KNOWN-ISSUES records the run.

The non-Enterprise notice is now just "Tenants are a Stalwart Enterprise
feature." Two sentences were reworded and one plural added, in all nine
catalogues, and the old sentences are gone.
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-15 09:37:00 -07:00
parent ce5eb04c2d
commit 40df0f658b
21 changed files with 211 additions and 48 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ export function TenantsAdmin({ selectedId }: { selectedId?: string }) {
<p className="lead">{t("Separate organisations on one server, each with its own people, domains and limits.")}</p>
</div>
</div>
<p className="admin-notice warn">{t("Tenants are a Stalwart Enterprise feature. This server does not report Enterprise, so anyone inside a tenant has only an ordinary user's permissions.")}</p>
<p className="admin-notice warn">{t("Tenants are a Stalwart Enterprise feature.")}</p>
</div>
);
}