The repositories moved off LINUXexpert-org. Here that is not a documentation change: the old organisation was the module path, so it is declared in go.mod and repeated in every internal import. Leaving it would have been worse than a stale link. GitHub redirects the repository, but a go.mod whose module line disagrees with the path it was fetched from is an error rather than a redirect, so `go get` on the new address would have failed against the old declaration. go.mod, 34 files of imports, and the repository links in README and ARCHITECTURE. go mod tidy leaves go.sum untouched -- no dependency moved, only our own path.
164 lines
5.7 KiB
Go
164 lines
5.7 KiB
Go
// SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2026 Coffey Labs
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
|
|
|
|
package applyplan
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/Coffey-Labs/stalwart-migrator/internal/backup"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// The exact principal shape a real 0.15.5 reports.
|
|
var migratedPrincipals = []backup.Principal{
|
|
{ID: 4, Type: "individual", Name: "alice", Emails: []string{"[email protected]"}, Roles: []string{"user"}},
|
|
{ID: 5, Type: "individual", Name: "bob", Emails: []string{"[email protected]"}, Roles: []string{"user"}},
|
|
{ID: 6, Type: "individual", Name: "sysadmin", Emails: []string{"[email protected]"}, Roles: []string{"admin"}},
|
|
{ID: 1, Type: "domain", Name: "smoke.test"},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The failure this exists to prevent: after a real migration the admin
|
|
// account authenticated fine and was refused every management call, because
|
|
// migrate_v016.py had given it the User role like everyone else.
|
|
func TestAccountRolesRestoresTheAdministrator(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ops, covered, warnings, err := AccountRoleOperations(migratedPrincipals)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(warnings) != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("unexpected warnings: %v", warnings)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(ops) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("generated %d op(s), want 1 - only the admin's role actually changes", len(ops))
|
|
}
|
|
v := ops[0].Value["role-sysadmin"]
|
|
if v == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("no operation for sysadmin: %+v", ops[0].Value)
|
|
}
|
|
// Account is multi-variant; without its own @type the upsert is
|
|
// rejected outright by the server.
|
|
if v["@type"] != "User" {
|
|
t.Errorf("@type = %v, want User (the Account variant)", v["@type"])
|
|
}
|
|
roles, ok := v["roles"].(map[string]any)
|
|
if !ok || roles["@type"] != "Admin" {
|
|
t.Errorf("roles = %v, want {\"@type\": \"Admin\"}", v["roles"])
|
|
}
|
|
if len(covered) != 1 {
|
|
t.Errorf("covered = %v, want one entry", covered)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Ordinary users already get User from the migration. Rewriting every
|
|
// account would be a far larger blast radius for no benefit.
|
|
func TestAccountRolesLeavesOrdinaryUsersAlone(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ops, _, _, err := AccountRoleOperations([]backup.Principal{
|
|
{Type: "individual", Name: "alice", Roles: []string{"user"}},
|
|
{Type: "individual", Name: "bob", Roles: []string{}},
|
|
})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(ops) != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("generated %d op(s) for plain users, want 0", len(ops))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestAccountRolesSkipsNonIndividuals(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ops, _, _, err := AccountRoleOperations([]backup.Principal{
|
|
{Type: "domain", Name: "smoke.test", Roles: []string{"admin"}},
|
|
{Type: "group", Name: "staff", Roles: []string{"admin"}},
|
|
})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(ops) != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("generated %d op(s) for non-individual principals, want 0", len(ops))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// v0.15 carries a list, v0.16 one variant. Under-privileging an
|
|
// administrator locks them out, so admin wins - and the collapse is
|
|
// reported, not silent.
|
|
func TestAccountRolesCollapsesMultipleRolesToAdminAndSaysSo(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ops, _, warnings, err := AccountRoleOperations([]backup.Principal{
|
|
{Type: "individual", Name: "boss", Roles: []string{"user", "admin"}},
|
|
})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(ops) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("generated %d op(s), want 1", len(ops))
|
|
}
|
|
roles := ops[0].Value["role-boss"]["roles"].(map[string]any)
|
|
if roles["@type"] != "Admin" {
|
|
t.Errorf("roles = %v, want Admin to win", roles)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(warnings) != 1 || !strings.Contains(warnings[0], "collapsed") {
|
|
t.Errorf("warnings = %v, want the collapse reported", warnings)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestAccountRolesReportsRolesItCannotMap(t *testing.T) {
|
|
_, _, warnings, err := AccountRoleOperations([]backup.Principal{
|
|
{Type: "individual", Name: "auditor", Roles: []string{"compliance-reviewer"}},
|
|
})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(warnings) != 1 || !strings.Contains(warnings[0], "compliance-reviewer") {
|
|
t.Errorf("warnings = %v, want the unmappable role named", warnings)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Found by a dress rehearsal against a clone of production, where accounts
|
|
// are named by address. v0.16 stores an account as a local part plus a
|
|
// domain reference, and rejects a full address outright ("Invalid email
|
|
// local part"). The smoke instance used bare names and never exercised it.
|
|
func TestAccountRolesUsesTheLocalPartOfAnEmailStyleName(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ops, _, warnings, err := AccountRoleOperations([]backup.Principal{
|
|
{Type: "individual", Name: "[email protected]", Emails: []string{"[email protected]"}, Roles: []string{"admin"}},
|
|
})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(ops) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("generated %d op(s), want 1", len(ops))
|
|
}
|
|
v := ops[0].Value["role-john"]
|
|
if v == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("operation not keyed by local part: %+v", ops[0].Value)
|
|
}
|
|
if v["name"] != "john" {
|
|
t.Errorf("name = %v, want the local part \"john\" - the full address is rejected by the server", v["name"])
|
|
}
|
|
if len(warnings) != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("unexpected warnings: %v", warnings)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Local parts are unique only within a domain. Granting Admin to the wrong
|
|
// account is worse than granting it to none.
|
|
func TestAccountRolesRefusesAnAmbiguousLocalPart(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ops, covered, warnings, err := AccountRoleOperations([]backup.Principal{
|
|
{Type: "individual", Name: "[email protected]", Roles: []string{"admin"}},
|
|
{Type: "individual", Name: "[email protected]", Roles: []string{"user"}},
|
|
})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(ops) != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("generated %d op(s) for an ambiguous local part, want 0 - it could land on the wrong account", len(ops))
|
|
}
|
|
if len(covered) != 0 {
|
|
t.Errorf("covered = %v, want none", covered)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(warnings) != 1 || !strings.Contains(warnings[0], "share the local part") {
|
|
t.Errorf("warnings = %v, want one explaining the ambiguity", warnings)
|
|
}
|
|
if !strings.Contains(warnings[0], "by hand") {
|
|
t.Errorf("warning %q should tell the operator what to do instead", warnings[0])
|
|
}
|
|
}
|