Running ihasmail is covered on docs.ihasmail.org, now including the
published image, the admin URL and BASE_PATH. Architecture, the mock's
switches and version numbers move to CONTRIBUTING.md, and 0.16.21's
client-visible changes to KNOWN-ISSUES.md. The Gmail comparisons go.
i18n-literals checked title, aria-label, placeholder and alt on elements,
but not the same English passed to a component, so a MenuItem label or a
Popover ariaLabel written as a literal went through. It also excused a
literal that happened to be a catalogue key. That exemption is meant for
English held in a constant and translated where it renders, and a literal
written straight into a JSX attribute has no such render site. No
component passes its props through t(). And neither half of i18n:check
was run with --check, so a finding printed and the script still exited 0.
Component props are checked now, a key no longer excuses a literal in an
attribute, and both scripts run with --check. That found 28 strings
rendering English in every language: 19 already had keys and are wrapped,
and 9 are new keys in all nine catalogues. The contact editor's Save and
Saving… buttons are wrapped as well, on the same line.
The plural-key gotcha and the reasons store tests miss visible bugs are
contributor guidance, not a side file: they belong next to the rest of
the pull-request checklist where anybody sending a change will read them.
Two things a contributor could only find out by tripping over them.
`main` now carries a ruleset: a pull request with a green build check, no
force-push, no deletion, and deliberately no required approval -- which
would lock a solo maintainer out of their own repository rather than
protect anything.
And a new user-visible string is work in nine catalogues. A missing key
renders its English source rather than failing, so the omission is
invisible from here and obvious to anyone reading that language. The
plural-key trap is in CLAUDE.md rather than repeated here.
Docs only. No strings added, no catalogues touched.
The repositories moved off LINUXexpert-org. The old URLs redirect, so
nothing was broken, but a redirect is not a correct address to publish.
The SOURCE_URL defaults matter most: the AGPL asks whoever runs a
modified version to offer that version's source, and the sign-in page and
About screen show this link. It is in four places that have to agree --
the compose file, .env.example, the server default and the web fallback.
The rest is documentation and issue links.
jcoffey-dev
LINUXexpert.org