Appearance gained "Apply the theme to messages too" some time ago, and it
themes an HTML message only when the message brings no colours of its own.
That predicate is the right default and it almost never passes: one
`color:#FFFFFF` on one button label opts a whole message out, so in real
mail — receipts, shipping notices, anything from a template — the switch
did nothing at all and the reader kept a bright white card on a dark UI.
A second switch, off by default and only meaningful with the first on,
forces the palette over the sender's colours. It cannot be done perfectly,
which is why it is a separate, explicit choice: the same bargain a
dark-reader extension makes.
What it does is tell two kinds of colour apart. A *sheet* the design sits
on — the white 600px wrapper — is neutralised, and a *painted surface* —
a call to action, a footer banner — is kept whole so its label stays
legible on it. Relative luminance decides, at 0.5: white wrappers sit at
1.0, a blue button near 0.09. Only the painted ones are marked, with
data-ihm-keep, and one rule in EMAIL_BASE_CSS neutralises everything else.
Nothing the sender wrote is removed, so the switch is reversible, colours
arriving from a <style> block are covered as well as inline ones, and
print still pins the tokens to ink on white.
The mock grew the message this is about: an outer wrapper on
bgcolor="#ffffff", a <style> block, a coloured button, a grey footer.
Without one, neither the bug nor the fix could be seen.
Verified in a browser against the mock: with only the first switch on the
card is still white; with both, the wrapper computes to transparent, body
text follows the theme, and the button keeps white-on-blue. Two surfaces
marked, which are the two the message paints.
Closes#290
A signed message now says whether that holds up, as it is read. This is
verification only: nothing here signs, encrypts or decrypts, and the
private-key question that blocks those is untouched. Verifying needed
none of it, because the certificate travels inside the message -- which
is why this is the half that could be built.
What it checks. For multipart/signed carrying PKCS#7, the exact bytes of
the signed part -- headers included, canonicalised to CRLF -- are hashed
against the messageDigest attribute, and the signature over the signed
attributes is verified with WebCrypto against the certificate inside the
message. RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 and ECDSA over P-256/384/521, with SHA-256, 384
or 512.
The trust model is the design, and it is deliberately small. A browser
has no system trust store, and the certificate arrives inside the
message, so anyone can self-sign as anyone: on its own a good signature
shows only that the sender held the key they attached. So the word
"verified" is never rendered, and the reassuring case is not the loud
one. What carries the weight is remembering -- the first signed message
from an address pins its fingerprint, later ones are compared, and a
signer that changed is reported with both names and told to check by
another route. Trust on first use, no certificate authority anywhere.
The pins live in the account's settings rather than the browser: one
that only a single device knew would greet the same correspondent as new
everywhere else, which is how people are trained to click past the one
warning that matters. A pin records the message that created it, so the
message that established a signer keeps saying so instead of appearing
to be corroborated by itself -- without that, the very first signed
message anybody receives reads as "the same signer as before", where
before is itself. A changed, mismatched or expired signer is never
pinned, since writing the anomaly into the baseline makes every later
message agree with it.
Three things are declined rather than attempted, and all three say
"could not check" rather than "does not check out", because ignorance
and an accusation are different claims:
- OpenPGP, by name. The signature carries no key and there is nowhere
to get the sender's: x:PublicKey is the account's OWN registry, and
a keyserver or WKD lookup would tell a third party who you
correspond with -- the leak the image proxy exists to close.
- SHA-1. Not forgeable in practice today, still not something to put a
tick beside.
- RSA-PSS, whose salt length lives in parameters this does not read.
Guessing wrong would report a good signature as bad.
Nothing validates a chain: no CA bundle is shipped and revocation is not
checked. "Issued by" reports what the certificate claims, and a
self-signed one claims itself.
The DER, CMS, X.509 and MIME readers are hand-written and deliberately
narrow -- no new dependency, and the whole verifier is a lazily imported
8.6 kB chunk that a reader of unsigned mail never downloads. The one
place this is easy to get quietly wrong has its own function and its own
test: signed attributes are signed as a SET OF, not as the [0] IMPLICIT
they arrive as, and hashing the message instead would make every
signature "pass".
Tested against real `openssl smime -sign` output rather than hand-built
fixtures -- RSA, ECDSA, a tampered copy, and a valid signature by a
certificate for somebody else -- because a signed message written by
hand only agrees with whatever its author believed the format to be.
Also driven in a browser against the mock, which now serves three real
signed messages so every branch of the banner is reachable.
Translations: 34 new strings in all nine catalogues, 306 entries.
Falling back to English is unchanged at 24 per language.
Raised on #174 as the other half of a migration -- import, notice
something is wrong, empty the book, correct the export, import again --
and tracked as #277.
The gap turned out to be wider than the ask. Contacts had no multi-select
at all: the only delete in the module was the cross on a single card's
pane, one card and one confirmation at a time. `destroyCards` has taken a
list and batched it against maxObjectsInSet since #218, and nothing in
the UI ever handed it more than one id. So "empty this address book" was
missing, and so was "delete these fourteen".
The list now has checkboxes, on hover the way the message list's are, and
always on a touchscreen where there is no hover to reveal them.
Shift-click takes the run between two rows. The search box gives way to a
selection bar rather than sitting beside it, because what the count
promises is what the search left on screen. A selection is cleared when
the book being shown changes, since carrying it across would leave a
count describing rows that are no longer there and a Delete aimed at
them.
Emptying a book is in the book's own menu, beside the import and export
that moved there in #226, and separate from Delete, which takes the book
with it. A default book cannot be deleted and can perfectly well be
emptied, which is most of the reason it is its own entry.
The part that is not a deletion, and the reason this is not one destroy
over everything in the book: a card filed in two books belongs to both,
and `ContactCard/set destroy` takes it away from both at once. Emptying
one book must not empty another, so a card with a second home is patched
out of this one and left alone. That is reported separately afterwards,
because it would otherwise look like contacts that refused to go.
`destroyCards` now answers with what the server confirmed rather than
throwing on the first refusal. A refusal that took half a selection with
it still deleted the other half, and an error saying only that it failed
sends somebody looking for contacts that are already gone. Both callers
report the count and the reason apart.
Emptying a shared book is deliberately not offered: the cards live in the
owner's account and this client has no path to write there.
One bug found by driving the built app rather than by any test, and worth
recording because of where it hid. The range a shift-click covers was
measured inside the `setPicked` updater -- which React runs when it gets
round to rendering, by which time the anchor ref has already been moved
to the row that *ended* the range. Every shift-click selected exactly one
row, and every store assertion still passed, because nothing was wrong
below the component. The anchor is read before the updater now, and the
contacts view has its first component tests: ten of them, six of which
fail if the measurement moves back inside.
Twelve new strings, in all nine catalogues, so nothing new falls back to
English.
Replying to a thread whose last message I sent addressed the reply to me:
Reply put my own address in To, and Reply all put me in To with everyone
I had actually written to demoted to Cc. Following up on your own last
message is an ordinary thing to do, and this made it useless.
There was already a guard for exactly this, and the guard was sound. What
it rested on was not. It asked whether an address was in the identity
list, and that question has a wrong answer in more situations than it has
a right one:
- the list is empty until identities load;
- an alias or a shared mailbox is not in it at all;
- it compared lowercased strings with `includes` where the rest of the
codebase uses `sameAddress`, so an identity address stored with
whitespace was enough to break it;
- the check ran on the address the reply was about to go to rather than
on the sender, so a message of mine carrying a Reply-To skipped it
entirely and my reply went to my own desk;
- and the Reply all branch never filtered my own address out of To, though
the Reply branch did.
Every one of those failed silently, which is why five of them accumulated.
So the folder is asked first: a message in Sent is mine whatever address
it went out as, and `mailboxIds` is already fetched in LIST_PROPS with
roleId("sent") on the mail store, so this costs no request. The identity
list stays as a second opinion, now compared with `sameAddress`, and the
whole test keys off the sender rather than off the computed recipient.
Two cases remain unanswerable and are commented rather than papered over:
a message from an unlisted alias that is not in Sent either, and any
message at all when identities failed to load and it is not in Sent.
Neither signal exists. Both are far narrower than what was broken.
Reply addressing had no tests at all, which is how a guard this
load-bearing came to be wrong five ways at once. Fifteen now, seven of
which fail against the old code.
Reported again by the submitter's colleague at LINET after #223 was
closed: duplicate checking was implemented for vCard and never for LDIF,
so re-importing an address book still leaves a second copy of everything.
That was deliberate at the time -- the matching key was an open question
I did not want to answer alone -- but the answer had already been given
on #174 and I closed the issue without acting on it.
The answer, in the submitter's words: an attribute that *can* change is
fine, because it will not have changed between two imports minutes apart.
An import is not a sync. That makes the `dn` usable -- it is the only
identity the file carries, and Mozilla's schema defines no UID -- and it
needs no guessing at all, unlike the name-plus-email fallback I had been
weighing.
So `uidFromDn` derives a namespaced, stable uid from the distinguished
name, normalised for the case and spacing two exports of one directory
differ in. A card the book already holds under that uid is updated rather
than duplicated, merged the way the vCard import merges: what the file
carries wins, what it does not mention is left alone. Reported as created
and updated, which is the pair that was asked for.
Three things worth knowing:
Matching is per address book, so two customer directories that each hold
a `cn=John Smith` stay two people as long as they are filed separately.
Imported into one book they would merge, which is the one way this can be
wrong and the reason the escape hatch is worth naming.
The look-alike count stays, and now means something narrower: entries
that `dn` matching could not catch -- one whose `dn` moved between
exports, and anything imported before there was a `dn` to match on. Those
are still only counted, never merged.
A file holding two entries under one `dn` is malformed, since a directory
cannot, and now becomes one card instead of two sharing an identity.
FEATURES gains the re-import behaviour for both formats; it documented
neither.
Found by widening the coverage check to plural() forms in every file rather
than the two being worked on. Seven counted strings in the Files view and the
event editor had never been in any of the nine catalogues, so they rendered in
English whatever language was chosen.
Not a regression from the recent work -- they have been missing since the
features landed, and every earlier scan looked at t("literal") sites and the
plurals of whichever file was in hand.
All nine languages, one commit rather than nine: this is a single gap in a
check rather than a translation pass, and splitting it per language would
suggest nine decisions where there is one.
Ticking "select all" disabled every keyboard shortcut until the reader clicked
somewhere else (#260). Same for the per-message checkboxes, so selecting a few
messages and pressing e to archive them did nothing.
The guard that stops "a" archiving while you are typing into the search box
tested `tagName === "INPUT"`. That is also true of a checkbox, and a checkbox
keeps focus after a click -- correctly, since space should toggle it again.
So the guard was suppressing shortcuts for an element that swallows no
keystroke: space is handled by the browser before this listener runs.
The question is not "is this an input" but "does this input take text", which
is what isTextEntry now asks. A <select> counts, in the sense that matters
here: typing a letter jumps to the option starting with it, and a shortcut
would steal that.
Thirteen checkboxes and seven file inputs across the app were affected, not
just the one reported.
The regression test was checked against the old guard first: it fails there
and passes here, which is the only thing that makes it a regression test.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the Ukrainian half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the Russian half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the Simplified Chinese half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the Japanese half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the Brazilian Portuguese half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the Dutch half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the French half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the Spanish half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the German half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
Both describeRule functions assembled their output by concatenation, which no
catalogue could fix. A translator handed " and " or " on " in isolation cannot
move it: German puts the verb last, Japanese does not separate list items with
a word at all, and the fragments arrive in an order the English sentence chose.
Reported by a native speaker reviewing the German catalogue (#247), whose "the
summaries" item is the Sieve one.
Every branch is now one whole sentence with placeholders, so a translator
rewrites the sentence including its word order. Joining is Intl.ListFormat,
which gives "A, B und C" for an allof rule and the language's own disjunction
for anyof, rather than a hardcoded " and " that would be wrong twice over.
The recurrence tail no longer appends: ", 5 times" and ", until 2026-05-03"
wrap the sentence they qualify, so a language that puts the limit first can.
Ordinals become words. The old suffix table -- st, nd, rd, th, picked by
arithmetic -- is English spelling rules in code, and no catalogue can reach a
suffix chosen that way. German writes "1.", Japanese "第1". nthOfPeriod is 1-5
or -1 in practice, so five words and "last" cover it.
WEEKDAYS is gone. Its long names could have been catalogue entries but its
short ones never could: "T" is Tuesday and Thursday, "S" is Saturday and
Sunday, and a catalogue cannot hold two translations under one key. That was
bad data rather than missing translation, and Intl has every name in every
locale in three widths. lib/datetime.ts gains weekdayName, weekdayNames and
formatList; recurrence.ts keeps WEEKDAY_KEYS for the ordering, which is not a
language question.
Adds the first tests either function has had. Neither had any, and no test
would have caught what was wrong with them, since the English output was
correct -- so these pin the two properties that actually matter: fragments go
through the catalogue, and the joining is Intl's.
32 strings and 9 plural forms are new and land with each language.
Verified: typecheck clean, 1009 tests pass.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
A sweep of lib/ and store/ for user-facing English, after the views were done.
The pattern here is the one #248 found: a module returns an English sentence
and the view renders it without asking for a translation.
Scheduled send was entirely untranslated. The four presets -- Later today,
Tomorrow morning, Tomorrow afternoon, Monday morning -- were rendered raw, and
scheduleError() returned three English sentences straight to the picker.
describeSpan() built "30 days" by appending an "s" unless the count was one,
which is English grammar written into the code: it produces the right German
only by the two languages happening to agree, and Russian needs three forms.
It is plural() now. scheduleError translates in place rather than returning a
key, because it composes a sentence around that span.
Read receipts: refusalText() returns five explanations, all rendered raw in
MessageView, and the offered case was a template literal -- "Requested, to
x@y. Never sent automatically." -- with the address concatenated in. It takes
a placeholder now, so the sentence can be reordered.
Compose: the sending toast and its Undo, the Open draft action, the two
attachment failures, and three thrown errors that surface to the reader as
toasts.
Two swipe labels, Add star and Remove star, are rendered through
t(desc.label) and have never been in any catalogue -- the coverage scan that
found the other 176 only looked at t("literal") sites, so labels reaching t()
through a variable were invisible to it. Every such table is now enumerated
and all 61 values checked: these two were the only ones missing.
17 strings and 3 plural forms are new and land with each language.
Verified: typecheck clean, 1000 tests pass.
A sweep for UI text still rendering in English, after the nine catalogues were
brought up to date. Four dialogs were building their own English:
- The delete confirmation in MailView, entirely: both titles, both messages
and the confirm label. Its counts read "message(s)", which is a
parenthesis standing in for agreement -- every language that inflects got
the wrong form. They are plural() calls now.
- Rename, in the Files tree.
- New address book, and its Name placeholder.
- New category, and its Name placeholder. The button opening that dialog was
already translated, which is how it went unnoticed: the label read right
and the dialog it opened did not.
Rename, New address book, New category, Name and Delete are already in all
nine catalogues. Delete?, Delete forever? and the two plural forms are new and
land with each language.
Verified: typecheck clean, 1000 tests pass.
Features landed after the catalogues were written and their strings were never
added, so they rendered in English. Reported against German (#247); every
language had the identical gap.
176 entries: 153 from features that shipped after the translation pass, and 23
keyboard bindings whose group and description are registered in English at the
call site and translated at render.
Follows the decisions this file already pins: 您 where the reader is addressed
directly and the pronoun dropped everywhere it can be, and the fixed
terminology, so 收件箱, 文件夹, 邮件, 会话, 标签, 已删除邮件, 草稿 and 设置
read the same here as everywhere above.
Fifteen strings are deliberately absent and keep falling back to English:
example.com and the other input placeholders, the product names, and the
verbatim header names List-Id and X-Spam-Status.
Verified: typecheck clean, 1000 tests pass, nothing missing from zh-Hans.ts.
jcoffey-dev
Coffey Labs