Every catalogue was at 1,255 of 1,279 with 24 strings rendering English.
Eight of those are real UI text and are now translated in all nine
languages: the five sort options that had no entry while their opposites
did (Read first beside Unread first, Unstarred first beside Starred
first, Smallest first beside Largest first, and the two alphabetical
directions), and the three sentences behind the link and external-sender
warnings. Each follows the phrasing its own catalogue already used for
the sibling it sits next to.
The remaining sixteen are left in English deliberately, because
translating them would be wrong: product and project names, the sample
addresses in placeholder text, bare URL prefixes, the ellipsis used as a
masked value, and two mail header names.
Per locale: 1,263 of 1,279, up from 1,255.
**The stale list is not touched, and should not be cleaned blindly.** The
checker reports 41 keys as translated-but-never-looked-up, and some of
them are live. "Classic" is the clearest: the palette picker renders it
through translate(p.name) from a constant, so the extractor sees no
literal, while the German "Klassisch" it would delete is the exact fix
issue #247 asked for. "Add star" and "Remove star" are the same shape,
reached through a ternary in a JSX label. Teaching the extractor those
two call sites is the prerequisite for trusting that list.
Catppuccin, Solarized, Ayu, Kanagawa, Everforest and Primer, each with the
light and dark variant its own project publishes: Latte and Mocha, Lotus
and Wave, and so on. Values were fetched from each project's own repository
and recorded in .palette-sources/palettes-upstream.md, with the two tiers
no project publishes marked derived rather than passed off as upstream.
Four candidates were rejected rather than adapted. Nord and Synthwave '84
publish no light variant, and inventing one is not porting a theme.
Monokai is proprietary and its licence forbids redistribution. Material
Theme has become a commercial product whose repository no longer publishes
a palette at all.
Body text is now lifted for contrast like every other text tone rather
than exempted and merely checked. Most of these palettes target their own
~4.5:1 for body text where ihasmail asks 7:1, so the old rule would have
rejected five of the six on a bar their designers never aimed at. Nudging
the published colour along its own hue is what the script already does for
muted text, links and accents, and every shift is printed in the generated
CSS: Solarized light moves 4.13 to 7.07, Primer needed nothing at all.
Primer is named for the design system, not for GitHub. The colour values
are MIT; the name and the logo are trademarks, and NOTICE says plainly
that nothing here is endorsed.
The picker grid already wrapped on its own, so twelve cards needed no
layout change.
The hint under the theme picker listed the third-party palettes by name.
That sentence is translated into nine languages, so every palette added
meant rewriting it, retranslating it nine times, and leaving the previous
version behind as a stale key nothing looks up.
It now describes the rule instead of enumerating the cases: a palette
named after another project is that project's work, used under its own
licence. True of the four here, true of the next one, and true without
saying "MIT" for a palette that might not be. The names are already in
Settings beside each swatch and in NOTICE with their copyright lines,
which is where a credit belongs.
Swapped rather than added in all nine catalogues, so the old key is gone
rather than left stale: 1,255 of 1,279 translated per locale, unchanged,
and the 41 pre-existing stale keys are neither added to nor cleaned up
here.
Appearance gained "Apply the theme to messages too" some time ago, and it
themes an HTML message only when the message brings no colours of its own.
That predicate is the right default and it almost never passes: one
`color:#FFFFFF` on one button label opts a whole message out, so in real
mail — receipts, shipping notices, anything from a template — the switch
did nothing at all and the reader kept a bright white card on a dark UI.
A second switch, off by default and only meaningful with the first on,
forces the palette over the sender's colours. It cannot be done perfectly,
which is why it is a separate, explicit choice: the same bargain a
dark-reader extension makes.
What it does is tell two kinds of colour apart. A *sheet* the design sits
on — the white 600px wrapper — is neutralised, and a *painted surface* —
a call to action, a footer banner — is kept whole so its label stays
legible on it. Relative luminance decides, at 0.5: white wrappers sit at
1.0, a blue button near 0.09. Only the painted ones are marked, with
data-ihm-keep, and one rule in EMAIL_BASE_CSS neutralises everything else.
Nothing the sender wrote is removed, so the switch is reversible, colours
arriving from a <style> block are covered as well as inline ones, and
print still pins the tokens to ink on white.
The mock grew the message this is about: an outer wrapper on
bgcolor="#ffffff", a <style> block, a coloured button, a grey footer.
Without one, neither the bug nor the fix could be seen.
Verified in a browser against the mock: with only the first switch on the
card is still white; with both, the wrapper computes to transparent, body
text follows the theme, and the button keeps white-on-blue. Two surfaces
marked, which are the two the message paints.
Closes#290
A signed message now says whether that holds up, as it is read. This is
verification only: nothing here signs, encrypts or decrypts, and the
private-key question that blocks those is untouched. Verifying needed
none of it, because the certificate travels inside the message -- which
is why this is the half that could be built.
What it checks. For multipart/signed carrying PKCS#7, the exact bytes of
the signed part -- headers included, canonicalised to CRLF -- are hashed
against the messageDigest attribute, and the signature over the signed
attributes is verified with WebCrypto against the certificate inside the
message. RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 and ECDSA over P-256/384/521, with SHA-256, 384
or 512.
The trust model is the design, and it is deliberately small. A browser
has no system trust store, and the certificate arrives inside the
message, so anyone can self-sign as anyone: on its own a good signature
shows only that the sender held the key they attached. So the word
"verified" is never rendered, and the reassuring case is not the loud
one. What carries the weight is remembering -- the first signed message
from an address pins its fingerprint, later ones are compared, and a
signer that changed is reported with both names and told to check by
another route. Trust on first use, no certificate authority anywhere.
The pins live in the account's settings rather than the browser: one
that only a single device knew would greet the same correspondent as new
everywhere else, which is how people are trained to click past the one
warning that matters. A pin records the message that created it, so the
message that established a signer keeps saying so instead of appearing
to be corroborated by itself -- without that, the very first signed
message anybody receives reads as "the same signer as before", where
before is itself. A changed, mismatched or expired signer is never
pinned, since writing the anomaly into the baseline makes every later
message agree with it.
Three things are declined rather than attempted, and all three say
"could not check" rather than "does not check out", because ignorance
and an accusation are different claims:
- OpenPGP, by name. The signature carries no key and there is nowhere
to get the sender's: x:PublicKey is the account's OWN registry, and
a keyserver or WKD lookup would tell a third party who you
correspond with -- the leak the image proxy exists to close.
- SHA-1. Not forgeable in practice today, still not something to put a
tick beside.
- RSA-PSS, whose salt length lives in parameters this does not read.
Guessing wrong would report a good signature as bad.
Nothing validates a chain: no CA bundle is shipped and revocation is not
checked. "Issued by" reports what the certificate claims, and a
self-signed one claims itself.
The DER, CMS, X.509 and MIME readers are hand-written and deliberately
narrow -- no new dependency, and the whole verifier is a lazily imported
8.6 kB chunk that a reader of unsigned mail never downloads. The one
place this is easy to get quietly wrong has its own function and its own
test: signed attributes are signed as a SET OF, not as the [0] IMPLICIT
they arrive as, and hashing the message instead would make every
signature "pass".
Tested against real `openssl smime -sign` output rather than hand-built
fixtures -- RSA, ECDSA, a tampered copy, and a valid signature by a
certificate for somebody else -- because a signed message written by
hand only agrees with whatever its author believed the format to be.
Also driven in a browser against the mock, which now serves three real
signed messages so every branch of the banner is reachable.
Translations: 34 new strings in all nine catalogues, 306 entries.
Falling back to English is unchanged at 24 per language.
Raised on #174 as the other half of a migration -- import, notice
something is wrong, empty the book, correct the export, import again --
and tracked as #277.
The gap turned out to be wider than the ask. Contacts had no multi-select
at all: the only delete in the module was the cross on a single card's
pane, one card and one confirmation at a time. `destroyCards` has taken a
list and batched it against maxObjectsInSet since #218, and nothing in
the UI ever handed it more than one id. So "empty this address book" was
missing, and so was "delete these fourteen".
The list now has checkboxes, on hover the way the message list's are, and
always on a touchscreen where there is no hover to reveal them.
Shift-click takes the run between two rows. The search box gives way to a
selection bar rather than sitting beside it, because what the count
promises is what the search left on screen. A selection is cleared when
the book being shown changes, since carrying it across would leave a
count describing rows that are no longer there and a Delete aimed at
them.
Emptying a book is in the book's own menu, beside the import and export
that moved there in #226, and separate from Delete, which takes the book
with it. A default book cannot be deleted and can perfectly well be
emptied, which is most of the reason it is its own entry.
The part that is not a deletion, and the reason this is not one destroy
over everything in the book: a card filed in two books belongs to both,
and `ContactCard/set destroy` takes it away from both at once. Emptying
one book must not empty another, so a card with a second home is patched
out of this one and left alone. That is reported separately afterwards,
because it would otherwise look like contacts that refused to go.
`destroyCards` now answers with what the server confirmed rather than
throwing on the first refusal. A refusal that took half a selection with
it still deleted the other half, and an error saying only that it failed
sends somebody looking for contacts that are already gone. Both callers
report the count and the reason apart.
Emptying a shared book is deliberately not offered: the cards live in the
owner's account and this client has no path to write there.
One bug found by driving the built app rather than by any test, and worth
recording because of where it hid. The range a shift-click covers was
measured inside the `setPicked` updater -- which React runs when it gets
round to rendering, by which time the anchor ref has already been moved
to the row that *ended* the range. Every shift-click selected exactly one
row, and every store assertion still passed, because nothing was wrong
below the component. The anchor is read before the updater now, and the
contacts view has its first component tests: ten of them, six of which
fail if the measurement moves back inside.
Twelve new strings, in all nine catalogues, so nothing new falls back to
English.
Replying to a thread whose last message I sent addressed the reply to me:
Reply put my own address in To, and Reply all put me in To with everyone
I had actually written to demoted to Cc. Following up on your own last
message is an ordinary thing to do, and this made it useless.
There was already a guard for exactly this, and the guard was sound. What
it rested on was not. It asked whether an address was in the identity
list, and that question has a wrong answer in more situations than it has
a right one:
- the list is empty until identities load;
- an alias or a shared mailbox is not in it at all;
- it compared lowercased strings with `includes` where the rest of the
codebase uses `sameAddress`, so an identity address stored with
whitespace was enough to break it;
- the check ran on the address the reply was about to go to rather than
on the sender, so a message of mine carrying a Reply-To skipped it
entirely and my reply went to my own desk;
- and the Reply all branch never filtered my own address out of To, though
the Reply branch did.
Every one of those failed silently, which is why five of them accumulated.
So the folder is asked first: a message in Sent is mine whatever address
it went out as, and `mailboxIds` is already fetched in LIST_PROPS with
roleId("sent") on the mail store, so this costs no request. The identity
list stays as a second opinion, now compared with `sameAddress`, and the
whole test keys off the sender rather than off the computed recipient.
Two cases remain unanswerable and are commented rather than papered over:
a message from an unlisted alias that is not in Sent either, and any
message at all when identities failed to load and it is not in Sent.
Neither signal exists. Both are far narrower than what was broken.
Reply addressing had no tests at all, which is how a guard this
load-bearing came to be wrong five ways at once. Fifteen now, seven of
which fail against the old code.
Reported again by the submitter's colleague at LINET after #223 was
closed: duplicate checking was implemented for vCard and never for LDIF,
so re-importing an address book still leaves a second copy of everything.
That was deliberate at the time -- the matching key was an open question
I did not want to answer alone -- but the answer had already been given
on #174 and I closed the issue without acting on it.
The answer, in the submitter's words: an attribute that *can* change is
fine, because it will not have changed between two imports minutes apart.
An import is not a sync. That makes the `dn` usable -- it is the only
identity the file carries, and Mozilla's schema defines no UID -- and it
needs no guessing at all, unlike the name-plus-email fallback I had been
weighing.
So `uidFromDn` derives a namespaced, stable uid from the distinguished
name, normalised for the case and spacing two exports of one directory
differ in. A card the book already holds under that uid is updated rather
than duplicated, merged the way the vCard import merges: what the file
carries wins, what it does not mention is left alone. Reported as created
and updated, which is the pair that was asked for.
Three things worth knowing:
Matching is per address book, so two customer directories that each hold
a `cn=John Smith` stay two people as long as they are filed separately.
Imported into one book they would merge, which is the one way this can be
wrong and the reason the escape hatch is worth naming.
The look-alike count stays, and now means something narrower: entries
that `dn` matching could not catch -- one whose `dn` moved between
exports, and anything imported before there was a `dn` to match on. Those
are still only counted, never merged.
A file holding two entries under one `dn` is malformed, since a directory
cannot, and now becomes one card instead of two sharing an identity.
FEATURES gains the re-import behaviour for both formats; it documented
neither.
Found by widening the coverage check to plural() forms in every file rather
than the two being worked on. Seven counted strings in the Files view and the
event editor had never been in any of the nine catalogues, so they rendered in
English whatever language was chosen.
Not a regression from the recent work -- they have been missing since the
features landed, and every earlier scan looked at t("literal") sites and the
plurals of whichever file was in hand.
All nine languages, one commit rather than nine: this is a single gap in a
check rather than a translation pass, and splitting it per language would
suggest nine decisions where there is one.
Ticking "select all" disabled every keyboard shortcut until the reader clicked
somewhere else (#260). Same for the per-message checkboxes, so selecting a few
messages and pressing e to archive them did nothing.
The guard that stops "a" archiving while you are typing into the search box
tested `tagName === "INPUT"`. That is also true of a checkbox, and a checkbox
keeps focus after a click -- correctly, since space should toggle it again.
So the guard was suppressing shortcuts for an element that swallows no
keystroke: space is handled by the browser before this listener runs.
The question is not "is this an input" but "does this input take text", which
is what isTextEntry now asks. A <select> counts, in the sense that matters
here: typing a letter jumps to the option starting with it, and a shortcut
would steal that.
Thirteen checkboxes and seven file inputs across the app were affected, not
just the one reported.
The regression test was checked against the old guard first: it fails there
and passes here, which is the only thing that makes it a regression test.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the Ukrainian half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the Russian half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the Simplified Chinese half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the Japanese half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the Brazilian Portuguese half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the Dutch half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the French half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the Spanish half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
#261 rebuilt the Sieve rule summaries and the recurrence descriptions as whole
sentences with placeholders, so that a translator can move the parts rather
than being handed " and " on its own. This is the German half of that.
32 strings and 9 plural forms. The ordinals are words -- there is no suffix to
append here, which was the point -- and the day and item lists are joined by
Intl.ListFormat rather than a translated separator.
Both describeRule functions assembled their output by concatenation, which no
catalogue could fix. A translator handed " and " or " on " in isolation cannot
move it: German puts the verb last, Japanese does not separate list items with
a word at all, and the fragments arrive in an order the English sentence chose.
Reported by a native speaker reviewing the German catalogue (#247), whose "the
summaries" item is the Sieve one.
Every branch is now one whole sentence with placeholders, so a translator
rewrites the sentence including its word order. Joining is Intl.ListFormat,
which gives "A, B und C" for an allof rule and the language's own disjunction
for anyof, rather than a hardcoded " and " that would be wrong twice over.
The recurrence tail no longer appends: ", 5 times" and ", until 2026-05-03"
wrap the sentence they qualify, so a language that puts the limit first can.
Ordinals become words. The old suffix table -- st, nd, rd, th, picked by
arithmetic -- is English spelling rules in code, and no catalogue can reach a
suffix chosen that way. German writes "1.", Japanese "第1". nthOfPeriod is 1-5
or -1 in practice, so five words and "last" cover it.
WEEKDAYS is gone. Its long names could have been catalogue entries but its
short ones never could: "T" is Tuesday and Thursday, "S" is Saturday and
Sunday, and a catalogue cannot hold two translations under one key. That was
bad data rather than missing translation, and Intl has every name in every
locale in three widths. lib/datetime.ts gains weekdayName, weekdayNames and
formatList; recurrence.ts keeps WEEKDAY_KEYS for the ordering, which is not a
language question.
Adds the first tests either function has had. Neither had any, and no test
would have caught what was wrong with them, since the English output was
correct -- so these pin the two properties that actually matter: fragments go
through the catalogue, and the joining is Intl's.
32 strings and 9 plural forms are new and land with each language.
Verified: typecheck clean, 1009 tests pass.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
The sweep in #259 found user-facing English in lib/ and store/ -- scheduled
send, the read-receipt explanations, compose toasts and thrown errors -- plus
two swipe labels that reach t() through a variable and so were invisible to a
scan for t("literal") call sites.
17 strings and 3 plural forms. "{n} days" and "{n} hours" replace a suffix
appended in the code, which is English grammar the catalogue could not reach.
Coffey Labs
jcoffey-dev