Switching a reply between plain text and rich text converted whatever
body the draft was showing. Going from plain text to rich, that meant
the quoted message came back as the "> " text quote run through a
converter -- the sender's formatting, images and links gone, even though
the original markup was sitting on the draft untouched.
Both forms of the quote are prepared when the reply opens, so keep them
on the draft and re-attach the right one when the format changes. Only
what the author typed above the quote is converted. Where the quote
can't be found any more -- edited by hand, or a draft that quotes
nothing -- the whole body is converted as before, which is what every
non-reply draft does.
No new strings.
A reply opened in the format the settings ask for, whatever the message
being answered was written in, and the per-draft switch was buried in
the composer's ⋮ menu. Replying in plain text to a rich text message
throws away the formatting; replying in rich text to a plain-text one
overrides what the sender chose to write in.
When the two disagree the composer now says so above the editor -- "This
message is rich text", with a Switch button and a dismiss -- and the
draft still opens in the format the settings ask for. Switching converts
that draft only and leaves the setting alone; switching from the ⋮ menu
answers the offer too. Forwards get it as well, where the formatting
being passed on is somebody else's.
What counts as rich text is hasHtmlAlternative(), which reads the body
part's own type: `htmlBody` is derived (RFC 8621 4.1.4), so a plain-text
message has one too and its presence proves nothing.
The mock said otherwise -- it returned an empty `htmlBody` for a
plain-text message, where Stalwart 0.16.21 returns the text/plain part
in both lists. Both builders now answer as the server does, so the path
this feature depends on is exercised in development rather than only
against a real mailbox.
Two new strings, translated in all nine catalogs; the buttons reuse the
menu's existing "Switch to plain text" / "Switch to rich text". The
count falling back to English stays at 16 in every language.
Fixes#407
Scheduled send, which the README listed as needing server support that
Stalwart has had all along. The delay cannot be asked for directly --
RFC 8621 makes `sendAt` read-only and server-derived -- so it goes on the
envelope as an RFC 4865 `HOLDUNTIL` parameter, and the server reports back
the time it settled on.
Stalwart advertises this in the *account* capability, not the session-level
one (which is empty): `maxDelayedSend` of thirty days and `FUTURERELEASE`
among its `submissionExtensions`. The composer offers scheduling only when
both are there, and never offers a time the server would refuse.
A held message goes to a Scheduled folder rather than Sent, because
`onSuccessUpdateEmail` would otherwise file it as sent the moment the
submission is created, and it has not been sent. Nothing moves it out when
the hold expires, so the folder is reconciled on the way in: released
messages to Sent, cancelled ones back to Drafts. Cancelling uses a separate
`Email/set` rather than `onSuccessUpdateEmail`, whose key Stalwart reads as
an Email id and not, as the RFC says, a submission id.
The mock grows the whole lifecycle, and learns to resolve creation
references while it is there -- it had been quietly declining to create any
submission at all, since sending names its message as `#m`. Because
Stalwart's own `futureRelease` setting defaults to off and then drops the
hold in silence, `npm run dev:mock:no-future-release` reproduces that.
Verified end to end against the mock; not yet against the live server.
Every message ihasmail sent set cc, bcc and replyTo to null when unused, and
inReplyTo/references likewise on a new message. Stalwart parses those
properties with try_into_address_list, which returns None for null, and the
create is rejected outright:
if let Some(addresses) = value.try_into_address_list() { ... }
else { response.invalid_property_create(id, header); continue 'create; }
So every send failed with "Invalid property or value.", new messages and
replies alike, regardless of attachments or signature. The mock server
accepts anything, which is why this only showed up against a real server.
Empty header properties are now omitted. On a create there is no previous
value to clear, so null was never needed - only the properties actually being
set belong in the object.
buildEmailObject is exported so the shape can be tested directly, with a
regression test that no property is ever null.