The picker opened on "No contacts in this address book" -- about an
address book with contacts in it. Nothing was wrong with the button, and
that is why it read as one: it opened, correctly, onto nothing.
Contacts are fetched on demand. `loadAll` runs when the Contacts view
mounts, and `suggest` kicks it off itself, which is why autocomplete has
always worked from anywhere. The picker did neither, so opening a
composer without having visited Contacts first -- which is most of the
time, and every time in a fresh tab -- showed an empty list over a full
account. Anyone who had been to Contacts that session saw it work, which
is the sort of difference that reads as browser-specific when it is not.
It asks for them now, and says it is loading rather than that there are
none.
While here: the picker decided which shared books to offer on
`isSubscribed` alone. Stalwart refuses that flag on a book shared
read-only, so those are recorded in settings instead -- for an address
book it is the *only* record -- and filtering on the server's flag left
every shared book out of the picker while the sidebar showed it. Both now
ask the same question.
Verified against the mock from a genuinely cold store -- cards emptied,
`loaded` false, opening the picker as the first thing that wants them:
eight rows, from the reader's own book and a shared one, where before
there were none.
Addressing a message worked only if you already knew the name you were
half-way through typing. Autocomplete answers "finish this for me"; there
was no answer to "who is there?", which is the question someone has when
they open a compose window and want the person from the team list whose
surname they cannot summon.
The To row now opens the address books -- from a button beside Cc and
Bcc, where someone thinking about recipients is already looking, and from
the To label itself for anyone who tries that first. Search across every
book or narrow to one, tick as many people as the message needs, and send
them to To, Cc or Bcc. Picking for a field that is hidden opens it, since
a Bcc dropped somewhere invisible is worse than no Bcc.
Every address is its own row rather than every person. Somebody with a
work address and a personal one is a choice the writer has to make, and a
picker that listed the card and quietly took the first address would be
making it for them.
Shared books are in it on the same footing as the reader's own -- that
being the point of having added them -- with the account named on each
row, so it is never a mystery whose list a name came from. Books that
have not been added contribute nothing, the same rule the To field
already follows.
Verified against the mock: the picker lists the reader's contacts and the
shared book's, each row naming its source; ticking one of each and
choosing Cc opens the Cc row with both in it.
jcoffey-dev