Commit Graph
9 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jcoffey-dev ded2f4dc1b Ten languages, not nine: correct the count everywhere
The picker offers English plus nine translations. I wrote it up as nine
in total with eight unread, which is off by one in the direction that
undercounts the work and, worse, misstates how many catalogues are
waiting for a speaker to read them.

Nine of the ten are machine-made and unread — all of them, not all but
one — so the sentence that matters reads more sharply than the wrong
version did, not less.
2026-08-31 15:36:04 -07:00
jcoffey-dev c26ca90e01 Document the nine languages, and what Beta means on them
The translations shipped today and the docs still said "no languages but
English". They also need to say the harder thing, which is that eight of
the nine have never been read by anybody who speaks them.

- README gains the language list, with the Beta caveat in the same line
  rather than a footnote.
- FEATURES.md gains an Interface language section: the list, why it is a
  separate setting from the date locale, and the two design properties
  that follow — a missing entry renders English, and plurals are asked of
  Intl.PluralRules rather than assumed, which is why Russian carries
  three forms and Japanese one.
- ROADMAP.md no longer lists translations as "not yet". What replaces it
  is the half that is genuinely not done: a translation anybody has
  checked. RTL is split out as its own entry, because holding Arabic,
  Hebrew and Persian back is a layout decision and not a queue position.
- KNOWN-ISSUES.md gains two entries. The unread catalogues, which is the
  one thing on that page that cannot be closed by testing. And the
  coverage number that read 100% while two hundred strings rendered
  English in every language — recorded as a general lesson rather than an
  i18n one, since a coverage number measures what it can see and the rest
  is exactly what nobody is checking.
2026-08-31 15:18:01 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 95dcb96086 Start extraction: an i18n core, and a way to see how far it has got
The groundwork in #145 gave the app a language to serve. This gives it
something to serve, and a way to measure the distance to the languages
actually planned.

The English text is the key. `t("Archive")` looks "Archive" up and returns the
English when it is not there, which buys three things worth more than tidy
symbolic keys: no English catalogue to keep in step with the code, a missing
translation that degrades to readable English rather than to
`mail.list.archive`, and an extraction step that is wrapping a string rather
than inventing a name for it. Names are where extraction stalls, and 55
components is a lot of small naming arguments. The cost is that editing English
copy orphans its translations, which is the right way round: the copy is the
product, and a stale German sentence should fall back to the new English.

`plural()` takes forms rather than (one, other), because two forms is an
English assumption that does not survive phase two of the plan. Russian and
Ukrainian need three, and choosing between them is not a question about the
number 1. Intl.PluralRules knows the rule for every language the browser knows,
so the catalogue supplies the forms and the runtime picks; a category the
catalogue does not carry falls back to `other` rather than rendering undefined.
Interpolation is named rather than positional for the same reason -- German
moves the parts of a sentence around and means the same thing.

Catalogues are dynamically imported, so a reader who never leaves English never
downloads one, and English needs no fetch at all. `applyLang` sets the lang
attribute before kicking the load, deliberately: lang is what stops Chrome
offering to translate and should not wait on a network request to say something
it already knows.

`t()` is a plain function, not a hook, so the tree is keyed on a language
version at the root and thrown away when the catalogue changes. Making every
call site a subscriber would turn extracting a string from "wrap it" into "wrap
it and add a hook", for an event that happens about once per account.

NotificationsSettings is extracted end to end as the reference -- it covers all
four shapes, being JSX text, translated attributes, a toast, and a sentence
with a value interpolated into it.

scripts/i18n-coverage.mjs counts what is left, because ~1,000 strings across 56
files is too many to eyeball in review or carry in anyone's head. It reports 20
wrapped and 925 remaining, and it deliberately does not count punctuation and
separators as untranslated -- a floor no amount of work could reach would make
the number useless. A progress report rather than a gate: --check exits
non-zero, for once the number is low enough for that to mean something.

ROADMAP.md said translations were "English-only for now" on a page whose stated
purpose is things the answer is "no" to. It now says what is actually happening,
carries the phase order, and says why Arabic, Hebrew and Persian are on neither
list: RTL is a layout and bidi problem rather than a longer catalogue, and
shipping it as though it were the same kind of work is how an RTL build ends up
unusable with nobody saying so.
2026-08-31 09:44:49 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 95f640b24c Point at the Coffey-Labs organisation
The repositories moved off LINUXexpert-org. The old URLs redirect, so
nothing was broken, but a redirect is not a correct address to publish.

The SOURCE_URL defaults matter most: the AGPL asks whoever runs a
modified version to offer that version's source, and the sign-in page and
About screen show this link. It is in four places that have to agree --
the compose file, .env.example, the server default and the web fallback.

The rest is documentation and issue links.
2026-08-30 15:17:43 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 1c678fabed Say where the 2FA entry came from, not that something is tracking it
The roadmap's preamble promised that anything with an issue number was tracked
in the issue tracker, and the two-factor entry ended in a bare "Reported as
#75". That issue was closed as completed on 2026-08-26, so the one entry the
promise applied to was the one it was wrong about: a reader following the link
finds a closed ticket and has to guess whether the work went with it.

It did not. #75 reported a sign-in refused with nothing but "Invalid
credentials", and that bug was fixed -- the message now says what is happening
and points at app passwords. The OAuth work the report uncovered stayed behind
on this page, which is exactly the case the preamble had no room for.

So the preamble now says an issue number records where an entry came from
rather than where it is tracked, and the entry says plainly that #75 is closed,
what closing it fixed, and that there is no ticket to watch for the rest.
2026-08-28 12:00:38 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 350f4f4197 Put address books in the left pane, other people's included
Address book sharing was withdrawn a few hours ago on a report that it
behaved like mail folder sharing. That was wrong -- it works -- and it is
back, built the way Files is rather than the way it was.

Three things it inherits from Files. Shared books are listed in the app's
own left pane instead of behind an account switch in the profile menu.
The reader's books and other people's sit under separate headings, since
a book belonging to somebody else behaves differently and a single merged
list would be quiet about whose contacts you are reading. And opening
Contacts re-reads the session, so a book shared while the tab was open
turns up without signing out and in again.

The books pane the view kept to itself is gone, and with it the last
module that ignored the sidebar it was given.

The one thing Files does not need: shared contacts have to answer when
somebody types a name into a To field, so they are loaded up front rather
than when a book is opened, and they are offered by `suggest` and found
by `lookupByEmail` alongside the reader's own. Their own cards win a tie,
since a card someone wrote themselves should beat a colleague's copy of
the same person. That is the difference between a shared book you can
look at and one you can use.

Cards from a shared account are held apart from the reader's rather than
merged in, and keyed by account as well as id. Ids are only unique within
an account -- two accounts each having a book `ab1` is ordinary -- and a
flat map would have had one silently replace the other.

The mock grew an address book in its shared account, with contacts in it,
because none of this could be exercised otherwise.

KNOWN-ISSUES records the withdrawal as the mistake it was rather than
leaving it in the history looking like a finding. Mail folder sharing
stays withdrawn: that one really is broken.
2026-08-27 10:40:50 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 1e2db95577 Stop offering to share mail folders, and let a share be removed
Sharing a mail folder does nothing. `Mailbox/set` takes the `shareWith`
map, `Mailbox/get` reads it back, and the folder never appears for the
account it was shared with -- confirmed on the live 0.16.19 with a folder
shared read-only to another account on the same server, which never saw
it. Stalwart's sharing documentation lists calendars, address books and
file storage; mail folders are not among them. Nothing anywhere reports a
failure, so a client that trusts what it reads back shows the share as
live for ever, which is what happened.

The entry point is withdrawn. Address book sharing goes with it on a
report that it behaved the same way -- not reproduced, and contradicted
by Stalwart's own docs, so that one is expected back; it is out because
offering a share nobody can verify was worse than the gap. Files and
calendars are untouched.

Removing a share was impossible, for a reason worth writing down. The
dialog rendered the list of who a thing was shared with *inside* the
branch that runs when the directory has principals to offer. A server
with `allowDirectoryQueries` off returns none -- that is the default, and
it is how these shares came to be made in the first place -- so the
dialog showed one line of hint and nothing else. The share was there, and
there was no way to see it, let alone remove it. The list is now rendered
whatever the directory says; only the control for adding somebody new
depends on having somebody to add.

So the withdrawn entry points do not strand what they created: a folder
or book already shared still offers "Stop sharing", which is the one
thing you want when the share is invisible everywhere else.

The API was never the problem, which is worth recording since it was the
first guess: `shareWith: null` is accepted and clears the map, tested
against the live server on the stuck folder, which is now unshared.
2026-08-27 10:28:05 -07:00
jcoffey-dev d15f64ada6 docs: put the Docker quick start back in the README
Slimming it left no way to try ihasmail without leaving GitHub. Restored in
short form -- the four commands, the 2FA app-password note, and links to the
install and configure guides for TLS and the full environment.

ROADMAP.md's 2FA entry points back at that section again, rather than at the
install docs it was redirected to when the section was gone.
2026-08-26 19:16:04 -07:00
jcoffey-dev 9618a0278c docs: slim the README, split out known issues and roadmap
The README had grown to 330 lines and was carrying three audiences at once:
installing, using, and working on ihasmail. docs.ihasmail.org covers the first
two now, and ihasmail.org covers the feature tour, so the README links there
instead of restating them.

- Known issues / pending QA → KNOWN-ISSUES.md, verbatim
- Roadmap / not yet → ROADMAP.md, verbatim (its "see Quick start" pointer now
  aims at the install docs, since that section is gone)
- Dropped the env-var table (docs.ihasmail.org/configure/), the shortcut list
  (/shortcuts/), the Docker quick start (/install/) and the long feature list
  (ihasmail.org/#features), leaving a nav table at the top and a six-line
  summary of what's in it
- Kept and tightened what is only true of this tree: architecture, dev
  commands, the mock, version numbers, deploying
- Version examples refreshed from 2.16.57 to the current 2.16.84
2026-08-26 19:02:04 -07:00