Add Domains to Administration

A role that can read domains now finds a Domains section beside Accounts:
list and search with each domain's account count and whether its DNS, DKIM
and certificate are managed automatically; add a domain; edit its
description, other names, catch-all address and plus addressing; copy its
DNS records one at a time or as a zone file; see its DKIM keys and their
stage; and remove it once no accounts use it.

The records come from the zone file Stalwart computes per domain. A long
DKIM record, which the BIND serialiser splits into quoted chunks, is joined
back into the single value a DNS provider's form wants.

Removing a domain takes its DKIM keys first, in the same request, because the
server will not remove a domain its keys still name. Removal is not offered
while accounts use the domain, or when the role cannot remove the keys.

The Administration nav is now built from the sections the role can read, and
the menu appears when there is at least one. The mock gains domains, DKIM
keys and zone files.

61 new strings, translated in all nine catalogues; strings falling back to
English stay at 16.
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-13 15:39:16 -07:00
parent d279fe8f90
commit 1dafb4bc79
23 changed files with 1783 additions and 30 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ the rest is here because the answer is "no", not "not yet".
See [KNOWN-ISSUES.md](KNOWN-ISSUES.md) for what is built but worth knowing about.
- **Administration beyond accounts.** The Administration menu manages accounts today — see [FEATURES.md](FEATURES.md#administration). Groups, mailing lists, roles, domains with their DNS records and DKIM keys, DNS providers and tenants are all Stalwart registry objects behind the same permission model, and each is a section to add rather than a design to invent. Reporting, queues, logs and server settings are not planned: they are operating the server, which is Stalwart's own interface's job, not managing the people on it.
- **Administration beyond accounts and domains.** The Administration menu manages accounts and domains today — see [FEATURES.md](FEATURES.md#administration). Groups, mailing lists, roles, DNS and ACME providers and tenants are Stalwart registry objects behind the same permission model, and each is a section to add rather than a design to invent; so is switching a domain's DNS, DKIM or certificate management, which is shown but not yet changed from ihasmail. Reporting, queues, logs and server settings are not planned: they are operating the server, which is Stalwart's own interface's job, not managing the people on it.
- **Sharing a mail folder.** Stalwart stores the share and never delivers it; see [KNOWN-ISSUES.md](KNOWN-ISSUES.md). Withdrawn until the server does something with it. Sharing files, calendars and address books is unaffected and works.
- **A scheduling view of its own**, for asking "when is everyone free next week?" without an event in hand. The grid itself is built and lives in the event editor — a row per participant, steppable, and clickable to place the event — which is where the question gets asked while you are arranging something. What is not built is the same thing as a destination you can visit with nothing in progress. Came out of [#172](https://github.com/Coffey-Labs/ihasmail/issues/172), which asked for a separate view and is closed by the panel: the reasoning for putting it in the editor is that a separate surface can only ever tell you a time you then retype, whereas one beside the event can set it. It stays here rather than in the tracker because nobody has yet said they want to ask the question on its own.
- **Per-message actions from the message list on a touchscreen.** Reply, Forward and compose-as-new are on the list row's context menu, which is a right-click — and holding a row on a phone starts selection instead, so none of them are reachable there. They are all available inside a thread, which is where the actions on a single message belong; what is missing is the shortcut from the list. Fixing it means deciding what a long press should do when it already means something, which is a bigger question than the actions themselves.