Say the Archive folder needs the role, not the name
Archiving looks the folder up by its special-use role and by nothing else --
roleId("archive"), falling back to roleId("all") -- and then, finding
neither, told you to create a folder named "Archive". Naming a folder does
not give it a role, and ihasmail has no way to assign one: Folders settings
shows the role beside a folder and offers no way to set it. So the advice
sent someone round a loop that could not end. They make the folder, it still
does not work, and the message says the same thing again.
It now says what is actually required and where it lives: a folder needs the
Archive role on the server, and naming it "Archive" is not enough.
All nine catalogues carry the correction rather than falling back to English,
and they need the same native review the rest of them do.
The existing test asserted only that archiving complained. It now checks what
the complaint says, since the words were the whole bug.
Closes #217.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ export const catalog: Catalog = {
|
||||
"New all-day event on {date}": "在 {date} 新建全天日程",
|
||||
"New event at {time}": "在 {time} 新建日程",
|
||||
"New identity": "新建发件身份",
|
||||
"No Archive folder found. Create one named “Archive” first.": "未找到归档文件夹。请先创建一个名为「Archive」的文件夹。",
|
||||
"No Archive folder is set. A folder needs the Archive role on the server; naming it “Archive” is not enough.": "未设置归档文件夹。文件夹需要在服务器上具有「Archive」角色,仅命名为此并不够。",
|
||||
"No contacts yet": "还没有联系人",
|
||||
"No longer shared": "已停止共享",
|
||||
"No matches": "没有匹配项",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user