README only. Scheduled send was marked "not yet exercised against the live server", and it now has been — that claim was the last thing standing between the deploy hold on 04580f2 and production.
With futureRelease set to 30d on the live 0.16.19, a submission carrying a HOLDUNTIL ten minutes out came back:
sendAt: 2026-08-25T16:32:26Z (exactly the time asked for)
undoStatus: pending
delivery: 250 2.1.5 Queued
rather than being sent at once. The submission was cancelled and the draft deleted, so nothing was delivered.
The entry also now says plainly that the capability is no evidence either way: it advertised maxDelayedSend: 2592000 and FUTURERELEASE throughout, including while the setting was off. That is the obvious thing to reach for and it lies — worth stating, since the whole bug is that nothing errors.
What stays mock-only is narrowed rather than dropped: the Scheduled folder reconciling on the way in, and a hold actually expiring into a delivery. Neither was exercised here.
README only. Scheduled send was marked "not yet exercised against the live server", and it now has been — that claim was the last thing standing between the deploy hold on `04580f2` and production.
With `futureRelease` set to `30d` on the live 0.16.19, a submission carrying a `HOLDUNTIL` ten minutes out came back:
```
sendAt: 2026-08-25T16:32:26Z (exactly the time asked for)
undoStatus: pending
delivery: 250 2.1.5 Queued
```
rather than being sent at once. The submission was cancelled and the draft deleted, so nothing was delivered.
The entry also now says plainly that the capability is no evidence either way: it advertised `maxDelayedSend: 2592000` and `FUTURERELEASE` throughout, including while the setting was off. That is the obvious thing to reach for and it lies — worth stating, since the whole bug is that nothing errors.
What stays mock-only is narrowed rather than dropped: the **Scheduled** folder reconciling on the way in, and a hold actually expiring into a delivery. Neither was exercised here.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
**Merged** 2026-08-25 as coffey-labs/ihasmail@db6afb72ff77
<sub>Rebuilt from: git history, session transcript.</sub>
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
README only. Scheduled send was marked "not yet exercised against the live server", and it now has been — that claim was the last thing standing between the deploy hold on
04580f2and production.With
futureReleaseset to30don the live 0.16.19, a submission carrying aHOLDUNTILten minutes out came back:rather than being sent at once. The submission was cancelled and the draft deleted, so nothing was delivered.
The entry also now says plainly that the capability is no evidence either way: it advertised
maxDelayedSend: 2592000andFUTURERELEASEthroughout, including while the setting was off. That is the obvious thing to reach for and it lies — worth stating, since the whole bug is that nothing errors.What stays mock-only is narrowed rather than dropped: the Scheduled folder reconciling on the way in, and a hold actually expiring into a delivery. Neither was exercised here.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Merged 2026-08-25 as coffey-labs/ihasmail@db6afb72ff
Rebuilt from: git history, session transcript.